Audit of Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities in ... - SA HealthInfo

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Friedmann, P.D., Lemon, S.C., & Stein, M.D. (2001). Transportation and retention in outpatientdrug abuse treatment programmes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 21: 97-103.Friedmann, P.D., Alexander, J.A., & D’Aunno, T.A. (1999). Organisational correlates of accessto primary care and mental health services in drug abuse treatment units. Journal of SubstanceAbuse Treatment, 16: 71-80.Goosen, J., Bowley, D.M., Degiannis, E., & Plani, F. (2003). Trauma care systems in SouthAfrica. Injury, 34: 704-8.Gossop, M., Marsden, J., Stewart, D., & Treacy, S. (2001). Outcomes after methadonemaintenance and methadone reduction treatments: Two-year follow-up results from the NationalTreatment Outcome Research Study. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 62: 255-64.Grant, B., & Petrie, M. (2001). Alcohol and other drug treatment services. Development of anational minimum data set. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Canberra.Grant, B.F. (1997). Barriers to alcoholism treatment: Reasons for not seeking treatment in ageneral population sample. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58: 365–371.Hser, Y.I., Maglione, M., Polinsky, M.L., & Anglin, D. (1998). Predicting drug treatment entryamong treatment-seeking individuals. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 15: 213–220.Kalichman, S.C., Simbayi, L.C., Kagee, A., Toefy, Y., Jooste, S., Cain, D., & Cherry, C. (2006).Associations of poverty, substance use, and HIV transmission risk behaviors in three SouthAfrican communities. Social Science & Medicine, 62: 1641-1649.Kaplan, E. H., & Johri, M. (2000). Treatment on demand: An operational model. Health CareManagement Science, 3: 171–183.Joe, G.W., Broome, K.M., Rowan-Szal, G.A., & Dwayne Simpson, D. (2002). Measuring patientattributes and engagement in treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22: 183-196.Latkin, C.A., Williams, C., Wang, J., & Curry, A.D. (2005). Neighborhood social disorder as adeterminant of drug injection behaviors: A structural equation modeling approach. HealthPsychology, 24: 96-100.Lee, M.T., Reif, S., Ritter, G.A., Levine, H. J., & Horgan, C.M. (2001). Access to services inthe substance abuse treatment system. In Glanater, M. (ed). Alcoholism. Volume 15: Servicesresearch in the era of managed care. Organisation, access, economics, outcome (pp. 137-156).Kluwer Academics: New York.Mejita, C., & Bokos, P.R. (1997). Improving substance abuse treatment access and retentionusing a case management approach. Journal of Drug Issues, 27: 1-9.Myers, B. (2004). Report on audit of substance abuse treatment facilities in Gauteng (2003).Medical Research Council: Parow.Myers, B. (2007). Access to substance abuse treatment for historically disadvantagedcommunities in Cape Town. Medical Research Council: Parow.86
Myers, B., & Fakier, N. (2007). Report on audit of substance abuse treatment facilities inGauteng and KwaZulu-Natal (2006-2007). Medical Research Council: Parow.Myers, B., & Parry, C.D.H. (2003). Report on audit of substance abuse treatment facilities inCape Town (2002). Medical Research Council: Parow.Myers, B., & Parry, C.D.H. (2005). Access to substance abuse treatment for Black SouthAfricans: Findings from audits of specialist substance abuse treatment facilities. South AfricanPsychiatry Review, 8: 15-19.Myers, B., Parry, C.D.H., & Plüddemann, A. (2004). Indicators of substance abuse treatmentdemand in Cape Town, South Africa: 1997-2001. Curationis, 27: 27-31.National Department of Health (1997). White paper on the transformation of the health system,April 1997. South African Department of Health: Pretoria.National Department of Social Development (1997). White paper on the transformation of thesocial welfare system. South African Department of Social Development: Pretoria.National Department of Social Development (2006). Draft: Revised prevention and treatment ofSubstance Abuse Act. South African Department of Social Development: Pretoria.National Institute on Drug Abuse (2006). Principles of drug addiction treatment: A researchbasedguide. National Institute of Health: Washington.Parry, C.D.H., Bhana, A., Myers, B., Plüddemann, A., Flisher, A.J., Peden, M., & Morojele, N.K.(2002a). Alcohol use in South Africa: Findings from The South African CommunityEpidemiology Network on Drug Use (SACENDU) Project. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63:430-435.Parry, C.D.H., Bhana, A., Plüddemann, A., Myers, B., Siegfried, N., Morojele, N.K., Flisher,A.J., & Kozel, N. (2002b). The South African Community Epidemiology Network on Drug Use(SACENDU): Description, findings (1997-1999), and policy implications. Addiction, 97: 969-976.Parry, C.D.H., Plüddemann, A., Steyn, K., Bradshaw, D., Norman, R., & Laubsher R. (2005).Alcohol use in South Africa: Findings from the first demographic and health survey (1998).Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66: 91-97.Pauw, K. (2005). A profile of the Limpopo province: Demographics, poverty, inequality, andunemployment. Provide Project: Elsenburg.Perngpam, U., & Porncharoen,W. (2001). An evaluation of government run substance misusetreatment centres. World Health Organisation: Bangkok, Thailand.Sanders, D., & Chopra, M. (2006). Key challenges to achieving health for all in an inequitablesociety: The case of South Africa. American Journal of Public Health, 96: 73-78.Sawyer, K. M., Wechsberg, W. M., & Myers, B. (2006). Cultural similarities and differencesbetween a sample of Black/African and Coloured women in South Africa: Convergence of riskrelated to substance use, sexual behaviour, and violence. Women & Health, 43: 73-92.87
Page 1 and 2:
Alcohol & Drug Abuse Research UnitM
Page 3 and 4:
3.1.2 Treatment facility profile by
Page 5 and 6:
4.3 Targeting barriers to treatment
Page 7 and 8:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYA cross-sectional
Page 9 and 10:
services to historically underserve
Page 11 and 12:
use, reductions in criminal activit
Page 13 and 14:
Despite high levels of substance ab
Page 15 and 16:
Despite the apparent availability o
Page 17 and 18:
treatment services provided. At pre
Page 19 and 20:
use disorders whose physical and em
Page 21 and 22:
delivery, treatment retention, and
Page 23 and 24:
audit substance abuse treatment fac
Page 25 and 26:
2.8.3. Further data considerations
Page 27 and 28:
Figure 1. Inpatient intensity of ca
Page 29 and 30:
Since there is a large overlap betw
Page 31 and 32:
the total client population (χ = 4
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 7.Comparison of race profile
Page 35 and 36: services per month ranges from 13 t
Page 37 and 38: 3.4.1. Characteristics of staff at
Page 39 and 40: supervision. In contrast, a much sm
Page 41 and 42: In terms of client record-keeping,
Page 43 and 44: Core findings:• Compared to the p
Page 45 and 46: using 12-step approaches, 75.0% rep
Page 47 and 48: Figure 16. Proportion of treatment
Page 49 and 50: 3.7. ADDRESSING BARRIERS TO TREATME
Page 51 and 52: Table 11. Proportion of facilities
Page 55 and 56: Figure 20.Proportion of substance a
Page 61 and 62: 3.9.2. Monitoring of clients’ pro
Page 65 and 66: PART 4: DISCUSSION OF KEY FINDINGSW
Page 67 and 68: previous audits of specialist subst
Page 69 and 70: small proportion of South African d
Page 71 and 72: high levels of substance use among
Page 73 and 74: these barriers appears to significa
Page 75 and 76: appropriate services for Black/Afri
Page 77 and 78: clients progress post-treatment, an
Page 79 and 80: • The number of state facilities
Page 81 and 82: • Another way of ensuring (indire
Page 83 and 84: • The age appropriateness of serv
Page 85: REFERENCESAllard, S.W., Tolman, R.M
Page 89: Zule, W.A., Lam, W.K., & Wechsberg,
show all

Audit of Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities in ... - SA HealthInfo

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?