Audit of Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities in ... - SA HealthInfo

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Schober, R., & Annis, H.M. (1996). Barriers to help-seeking for change in drinking: A genderfocusedreview of the literature. Addictive Behaviors, 21: 81–92.Simpson, D. D., Joe, G. W., & Brown, B. S. (1997). Treatment retention and follow-up outcomesin the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11:294-307.Statistics South Africa (1998a). Living in Free State. Statistics South Africa: Pretoria.Statistics South Africa (1998b). Living in North West. Statistics South Africa: Pretoria.Statistics South Africa (1998c). Living in Northern Cape. Statistics South Africa: Pretoria.Statistics South Africa (2005). Mid-year population estimates, South Africa 2005. StatisticsSouth Africa: Pretoria.Statistics South Africa (2006a). Provincial profile Free State: 2004. Statistics South Africa:Pretoria.Statistics South Africa (2006b). Provincial profile Limpopo: 2004. Statistics South Africa:Pretoria.Statistics South Africa (2006c). Provincial profile Mpumalanga: 2004. Statistics South Africa:Pretoria.Statistics South Africa (2006d). Provincial profile Northern Cape: 2004. Statistics South Africa:Pretoria.Sturm R., & Sherbourne, C.D. (2001). Are barriers to mental health and substance abuse care stillrising? Journal of Behavioral Health Services Research, 28: 81-88.Teesson, M., Havard, A., Fairbairn, S., Ross, J., Lynskey, M., & Darke, S. (2005). Depressionamong entrants to treatment for heroin dependence in the Australian Treatment Outcome Study(ATOS): Prevalence, correlates and treatment seeking. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 78: 309-315.Thind, A., & Andersen, R. (2003). Respiratory illness in the Dominican Republic: What are thepredictors for health services utilization of young children? Social Science & Medicine, 56:1173-1182.Torres, M. I., Mattick, R. P., Chen R., & Baillie, A. (1995). Clients of treatment service agencies:March 1995 census findings. Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra.Tucker, J.A., Vuchinich, R.E., & Rippens, P.D. (2004). A factor analytic study of influences onpatterns of help-seeking among treated and untreated alcohol dependent persons. Journal ofSubstance Abuse Treatment, 26: 237–242.Wechsberg, W.M., Craddock, S.G., & Hubbard, R.L. (1998). How are women who entersubstance abuse treatment different from men. A gender comparison from the Drug AbuseTreatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Drugs & Society, 13: 97-115.88
Zule, W.A., Lam, W.K., & Wechsberg, W.M. (2003). Treatment readiness among out-oftreatmentAfrican-American crack users. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 35: 503-510.89
Page 1 and 2:
Alcohol & Drug Abuse Research UnitM
Page 3 and 4:
3.1.2 Treatment facility profile by
Page 5 and 6:
4.3 Targeting barriers to treatment
Page 7 and 8:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYA cross-sectional
Page 9 and 10:
services to historically underserve
Page 11 and 12:
use, reductions in criminal activit
Page 13 and 14:
Despite high levels of substance ab
Page 15 and 16:
Despite the apparent availability o
Page 17 and 18:
treatment services provided. At pre
Page 19 and 20:
use disorders whose physical and em
Page 21 and 22:
delivery, treatment retention, and
Page 23 and 24:
audit substance abuse treatment fac
Page 25 and 26:
2.8.3. Further data considerations
Page 27 and 28:
Figure 1. Inpatient intensity of ca
Page 29 and 30:
Since there is a large overlap betw
Page 31 and 32:
the total client population (χ = 4
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 7.Comparison of race profile
Page 35 and 36:
services per month ranges from 13 t
Page 37 and 38: 3.4.1. Characteristics of staff at
Page 39 and 40: supervision. In contrast, a much sm
Page 41 and 42: In terms of client record-keeping,
Page 43 and 44: Core findings:• Compared to the p
Page 45 and 46: using 12-step approaches, 75.0% rep
Page 47 and 48: Figure 16. Proportion of treatment
Page 49 and 50: 3.7. ADDRESSING BARRIERS TO TREATME
Page 51 and 52: Table 11. Proportion of facilities
Page 55 and 56: Figure 20.Proportion of substance a
Page 61 and 62: 3.9.2. Monitoring of clients’ pro
Page 65 and 66: PART 4: DISCUSSION OF KEY FINDINGSW
Page 67 and 68: previous audits of specialist subst
Page 69 and 70: small proportion of South African d
Page 71 and 72: high levels of substance use among
Page 73 and 74: these barriers appears to significa
Page 75 and 76: appropriate services for Black/Afri
Page 77 and 78: clients progress post-treatment, an
Page 79 and 80: • The number of state facilities
Page 81 and 82: • Another way of ensuring (indire
Page 83 and 84: • The age appropriateness of serv
Page 85 and 86: REFERENCESAllard, S.W., Tolman, R.M
Page 87: Myers, B., & Fakier, N. (2007). Rep
show all

Audit of Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities in ... - SA HealthInfo

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?