22.11.2012 Views

Cutting or Tightening the Gordian Knot

Cutting or Tightening the Gordian Knot

Cutting or Tightening the Gordian Knot

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

taken as “given”, i.e. psychologically accepted as unalterable, <strong>or</strong> least recognised<br />

as alterable only at quite unacceptable cost.<br />

Reaching a “finalité politique” in terms of b<strong>or</strong>ders is <strong>the</strong> sine qua non of<br />

<strong>the</strong> region’s durable stabilisation, which means successful integration<br />

into <strong>the</strong> European mainstream. Past experience strongly suggests that<br />

achieving EU membership is only feasible with states that have both <strong>the</strong><br />

minimal political consensus on <strong>the</strong> main goals and <strong>the</strong> functional capacities<br />

to pursue <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

The search is still on f<strong>or</strong> “closure” on questions of statehood and b<strong>or</strong>ders<br />

in <strong>the</strong> region. I should explain what I mean by “closure”. This is a term<br />

derived from psychology ra<strong>the</strong>r than political science. “Closure” does<br />

not mean deciding to be happy with <strong>the</strong> situation you find yourself in. It<br />

does not mean you are fully (<strong>or</strong> even at all) reconciled with what has<br />

happened to you. You may well feel you will not, and cannot, ever want<br />

that. But it does mean recognising that grief and bitterness can take on<br />

self-destructive, suicidal dimensions. “Closure” is a way of somehow<br />

‘ring-fencing’ <strong>the</strong> problem, shutting it up in a box and putting it to one<br />

side f<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong> time being – recognising that, f<strong>or</strong> now, nothing m<strong>or</strong>e can be<br />

done about it. It means taking a respite, focussing on something else,<br />

trying ano<strong>the</strong>r tack. The result, in time, may be that <strong>the</strong> context changes<br />

so that ei<strong>the</strong>r it becomes easier to tackle <strong>the</strong> problem, <strong>or</strong> you change your<br />

perception of its significance. That may of course not be <strong>the</strong> result – but<br />

at least meanwhile you have not destroyed yourself and may even have<br />

gained something of value, even if not <strong>the</strong> thing you most wanted.<br />

If this psychological shift towards “closure” on questions of statehood<br />

and b<strong>or</strong>ders could be made in Balkan politics, it would prepare <strong>the</strong><br />

ground f<strong>or</strong> a shift from absolutist and non-negotiable ethno-nationalist<br />

demands and interminable zero-sum games to <strong>the</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e prosaic but usually<br />

m<strong>or</strong>e productive politics of “<strong>the</strong> art of <strong>the</strong> possible”.<br />

Yet what I detect in <strong>the</strong> Western Balkans is a lack of serious interest on<br />

<strong>the</strong> part of political leaders to achieving closure. A mode of elite politics<br />

persists that can be dated back to <strong>the</strong> 1990s (and probably even bef<strong>or</strong>e)<br />

that is attuned to, and feeds on, endemic uncertainty. It exploits, ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!