10.07.2015 Views

wr2014_web_0

wr2014_web_0

wr2014_web_0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AMERICASappointing a new National Court of Justice and hundreds of lower level judges.In December 2012, government-invited observers from Argentina, Brazil, Chile,Guatemala, Mexico, and Spain, published a report finding anomalies in thejudicial appointment process, including that of top justices. The observersurged the passage of a law to regulate disciplinary procedures, defining faultsclearly in order to avoid the risk of judges being suspended or punished simplyfor exercising their duties.Disproportionate Criminal Charges against ProtestersThe Criminal Code contains sweeping provisions on sabotage and terrorism,which prosecutors have repeatedly applied inappropriately against participantsin public protests and other gatherings. Acts classified as terrorism in Ecuadorinclude vaguely defined crimes such as “crimes against the common security ofpeople or human groups of whatever kind or against their property,” by individualsor associations “armed or not.” Such crimes carry a possible prison sentenceof four to eight years. A new draft of the criminal code that was undercongressional debate as of October 2013 would modify the existing definitionof terrorism, but the new definition could still allow prosecutors to bring terrorismcharges against participants in public protest.In February 2013, a court sentenced ten people, known as the Luluncoto 10(after the Quito neighborhood where they were detained), to one year in prisonfor attempted sabotage and terrorism. Arrested in March 2012 while holding apeaceful meeting to plan a public protest, most were held in pretrial detentionfor nine months. Their lawyers maintained the only evidence against them consistedof personal objects found in their homes, such as innocuous books,clothing, and music. As of October 2013, their appeal alleging mistrial was stillpending.Prosecutors have filed other serious charges against participants in publicprotests that are disproportionate to alleged acts. In February 2013, 12 studentswere charged for rebellion, a crime that carries a prison sentence of up to sixyears, for their alleged participation in violent incidents during a protest inQuito against the decision to change the name of their university. A judge laterdismissed the charges after the prosecutor was unable to substantiate them.After Correa criticized the judge’s decision in his weekly TV broadcast, another245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!