Magic could not resurrect Grendel to haunt the Danes further,but he still employed magic while alive to defend him from the effects<strong>of</strong> weaponry. In Beowulf, the narrator explains that:…no sword,Not the best iron anywhere in the world,Could even touch that evil sinner,For he had worked a curse on weapons,Every sort <strong>of</strong> blade. (Beowulf 801-805)Grendel uses magic, a sorcery that is not found in Christian theologyor practice, in order to protect him from the onslaught <strong>of</strong> man-madeweaponry. He twists the rules <strong>of</strong> fair combat to his own advantage,allowing his enemy to attack him while knowing full well that theweaponry will do him no harm.This magical resistance would have frightened the Danesincredibly, for what use would they be against a monster that couldnot be struck down with the best weapons they had, wielded bythe strongest and most capable warriors? Kieckhefer writes thatmagic is “a cluster <strong>of</strong> countercultural rituals worked privately forthe magicians’ personal ends” (Kieckhefer 815). While Grendel isnot a conventional “magician,” he is using the elements <strong>of</strong> magicfor his own benefit and denying the Danes access to a fair fight, asdemanded by their culture.In the context <strong>of</strong> Grendel using his magic for the powers <strong>of</strong>darkness and ill will, Kieckhefer elaborates that, “In a medievalcontext…demonic magic is itself essentially religious (or perhapsirreligious but at least not nonreligious), while natural magic could beeasily combined with devotional practice” (Kieckhefer 821). Grendelis clearly not implementing “natural magic,” for his maliciousintentions do not coincide with proper, peaceful devotion. Instead,he is employing “demonic magic,” which threatens the concept <strong>of</strong>deanna briscoe 99
what the proper religion is or can do. If Grendel’s magic is “religious”in a medieval concept, then is the Danes’ Christianity magical? Or,worse yet, is their faith somehow enjoined with Grendel’s, at a singleorigin point <strong>of</strong> religion?Grendel’s ability to remain “impervious to weapons” (Orchard 47)presents another fearful dimension to his monstrosity. He cannot bekilled in a normal fashion, and therefore cannot exist in a normalfashion. He is completely other, and so divided from how the worldshould function that ending his scourge would seem impossible.Luckily, Beowulf does not require the enhancements <strong>of</strong> magic for hisown prowess and strength, and can best Grendel without weaponry.Grendel is fearsome in his visage, superficially, but his fearsomequalities which make him monstrous are extensions <strong>of</strong> medievaltrepidations; the fear <strong>of</strong> the “other” on the borderlands, abandonmentby God, cannibalism, and dark magic. His existence is an ironic tauntto the Danes who dwell in his shadow, trembling. He is a monstrousfigure bent on death and destruction, but is also a creation <strong>of</strong> theDanes themselves. He is a metaconglomerate <strong>of</strong> their deepest fearsand darkest nightmares, given true form and a body. Therefore,they must kill what they have given life, and must destroy their owncreation. They are in turn destroying a part <strong>of</strong> themselves. Thus, anoutsider such as Beowulf must step in to destroy the monster andreset the balance <strong>of</strong> life, for he is not slaying his own identity.Grendel is the embodiment <strong>of</strong> distinctly medieval fears, althoughhis malicious acts are still seen as abhorrent today. The concept <strong>of</strong>monstrosity stays essentially the same, as well as what is feared, but themonster dons a new cloak and emerges from a new set <strong>of</strong> shadows.His visage will be different, and his execution <strong>of</strong> his dark intentionswill not be identical, but his eyes will still burn with the same fire,and the same desire to strike fear into the hearts <strong>of</strong> mortals.100 afternoons <strong>of</strong> alterity
- Page 1 and 2:
Afternoons of Alterity A Codex of t
- Page 4 and 5:
Table of ContentsFrom Medieval Mars
- Page 6 and 7:
From Medieval Marsh Monsters toFutu
- Page 8 and 9:
imagination, we must first attempt
- Page 10 and 11:
seed of monstrosity within themselv
- Page 12 and 13:
essence as a monster, it seems reas
- Page 14 and 15:
she bore two sons, one from the imp
- Page 16 and 17:
perhaps, anti-heroes) of the futuri
- Page 18 and 19:
to watch the murder and mutilation
- Page 20 and 21:
and modern audiences through their
- Page 22 and 23:
Works Cited“Bushwhacked.” Firef
- Page 24 and 25:
Projecting Otherness ontothe Disabl
- Page 26 and 27:
in any systematic structuration. An
- Page 28 and 29:
The idea of the monstrous’ vulner
- Page 30 and 31:
not us and are in the proximity of
- Page 32:
they want to be treated. The interv
- Page 36:
Monstrosity and theIrruption of Rea
- Page 39 and 40:
describing his fears of this place
- Page 41 and 42:
stained with sin” (Spearing 221).
- Page 43:
often and at will to show man somet
- Page 46 and 47:
What’s Love Got To Do With It?The
- Page 48 and 49:
story than as the beginning? What f
- Page 50 and 51:
It is textual content like this tha
- Page 52 and 53:
through the story as the Green Knig
- Page 54 and 55: the first advocating voices for end
- Page 56 and 57: “capable of seeing things objecti
- Page 58 and 59: Darkness: The True Monster ofLitera
- Page 60 and 61: the way they can make us feel, but
- Page 62 and 63: not only closes out, extinguishes,
- Page 64 and 65: and temptation, most especially for
- Page 66 and 67: hours “led to the term ‘night
- Page 68 and 69: specifically his relationship to da
- Page 70 and 71: humanization of Grendel draws the r
- Page 72 and 73: subconscious the message may be. Th
- Page 74 and 75: Serial MonstrosityEmily Mastrobatti
- Page 76 and 77: is clear that they are monsters and
- Page 78 and 79: murderer that he once was. He has b
- Page 80 and 81: of the killing, “When investigato
- Page 82 and 83: ook “contains recipes from the bo
- Page 84 and 85: asks Charles Manson to marry her, t
- Page 86 and 87: Monstrous Mothers andObjectified Da
- Page 88 and 89: and her sisters plot to kill their
- Page 90 and 91: easons for “otherness.” On top
- Page 92 and 93: The original ideas are still intact
- Page 94 and 95: objectified creature. “Cultures o
- Page 96 and 97: Works CitedAcker, P. Horror and the
- Page 98 and 99: Grendel: A Manifestation ofMedieval
- Page 100 and 101: ut never was his physicality hinted
- Page 102 and 103: to wander in the darkness and the c
- Page 106 and 107: Works CitedBeowulf. Trans. RM Liuzz
- Page 108 and 109: The Monster Under the BedThe Creati
- Page 110 and 111: to procreate but the accepted manif
- Page 112 and 113: Cain had/killed his father’s son
- Page 114 and 115: can, without a doubt, be placed int
- Page 116 and 117: The vagina’s ability to function
- Page 118: Ed. Barbara K. Gold, et all. Albany
- Page 121 and 122: To understand precisely how states
- Page 123 and 124: a strict delineation between each g
- Page 125 and 126: monstrous and societal rules to fol
- Page 127 and 128: Gawain is willing to accept his mis
- Page 129 and 130: survive, challenge, and defeat. Esp
- Page 131 and 132: governmental standards, then are we
- Page 134 and 135: They Walk Among UsOccupational Viol
- Page 136 and 137: sports and regard our members of th
- Page 138 and 139: modern readers are not part of the
- Page 140 and 141: otherness and disdain for humanity.
- Page 142 and 143: are underpaid and for the most part
- Page 144 and 145: Home and Spatial IdentityPhysical t
- Page 146 and 147: closeness among the people that the
- Page 148 and 149: Into the dark gorge I ventured; the
- Page 150 and 151: the treasures that fill up their ho
- Page 152 and 153: threatened by the very existence of
- Page 154 and 155:
and draped in damp, shaggy moss, an
- Page 156 and 157:
individual. Home resides within the
- Page 158:
Works CitedArmitage, Simon. Sir Gaw