2 July 2010,Friday Kapil Goel B.Com(H) FCA LLB Advocate Delhi ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bang ITAT in CGI Info….….wherein it was held that reimbursement of expenses had no elementof income and therefore cannot be considered as fees for technicalservices. Hence, there was no liability to deduct tax u/s 195(1) of the Act…. In the present case, on a perusal of the agreement of cost sharing, wehave already noticed that the payments were made by the assessee forreimbursement of the expenses incurred by CGI Canada. It has beenclearly mentioned in the agreement that the cost incurred does notinclude any mark up for income and that is limited to the actual cost. Nomaterial was brought on record by revenue that the cost reimbursed bythe assessee includes element of income. Therefore, the decision of theDelhi Tribunal in the case of Modicon Network (supra) squarely appliesin the present case ".
Mumbai ITAT Tekmark GlobalSolutions LLC• Indo-US Treaty : Persons deputed by an AmericanCompany to an Indian company cannot be considered asits PE in India when services rendered by them areindependent and not under control of that Americancompany• No income would arise to the American company in Indiain the course of deputing personnel to an Indian companywho work under the control and supervision of the Indiancompany and carry out the work allotted to them by theIndian Company and the American company isreimbursed by the Indian company
Page 1 and 2: ICAI Committee on International Tax
Page 3 and 4: Outline• Mumbai Bench of ITAT in
Page 5 and 6: Outline• Taxability of Offshore S
Page 7 and 8: Tax Avoidance: SC AzadiBachao• Th
Page 9 and 10: Tax Avoidance: E-Trade• E*Trade M
Page 11 and 12: Tax Avoidance: E-Trade• The AAR r
Page 14 and 15: Tax Avoidance: E-Trade• Bombay Hi
Page 16 and 17: Tax Avoidance: STAR AAR…..Be that
Page 18 and 19: Tax Avoidance: P&H Porrits..• On
Page 20 and 21: Tax Avoidance: VodafonecaseIst Roun
Page 22 and 23: Tax Avoidance: Vodafone• Facts:
Page 24 and 25: Tax Avoidance: Vodafone BHCInitial
Page 26 and 27: Tax Avoidance: Vodafone BHCInitial
Page 28 and 29: Tax Avoidance: Developmentsto look
Page 30 and 31: Changes in DTC in FTS andServices t
Page 32 and 33: Bang ITAT Mondial Orient• AAR Con
Page 34 and 35: Delhi ITAT Lucent ServicePEHeld: A
Page 36 and 37: BHC in Krupp GmbH• The learned Co
Page 38 and 39: BHC in Krupp GmbH• Further refer:
Page 42 and 43: Nathpa Jhakri Joint Venture vsACIT
Page 44 and 45: BHC in InformationArchitects• In
Page 46 and 47: Contd Mum ITAT Royalty….25. It is
Page 48 and 49: DHC Royalty Sahara…• Appellant/
Page 50 and 51: Mum ITAT Ashapura BauxiteTesting In
Page 52 and 53: AAR FICCI - INDIA USDTAA• Held "
Page 54 and 55: AAR in HMS Real Estate• HMS real
Page 56 and 57: AAR in Airport Authority case• Th
Page 58 and 59: AAR Software : AirportAuthority cas
Page 60 and 61: AAR Seagate: India SingaporeDTAA•
Page 62 and 63: AAR Seagate: India SingaporeDTAA•
Page 64 and 65: Delhi ITAT ParasrampuriaSynthetics
Page 66 and 67: AAR IN Royal Bank ofCanada• There
Page 68 and 69: Kar High Court Illions case• Kar
Page 70 and 71: “Technopromexport”HELD11. In vi
Page 72 and 73: “Technopromexport”HELD• As ob
Page 74 and 75: AAR in Hyundai and MistubishiAOP Co
Page 76 and 77: Mumbai ITAT in Valentine 3taxmann.c
Page 78 and 79: Delhi ITAT Pioneer India USADTAA 1
Page 80: Thank YouKapil Goelcakapilgoel@gmai

2 July 2010,Friday Kapil Goel B.Com(H) FCA LLB Advocate Delhi ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?