11.07.2015 Views

Tuolumne River Report - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Tuolumne River Report - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Tuolumne River Report - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LINKING PHYSICAL PROCESSES AND SALMON LIFE HISTORYCHAPTER 2Figure 2-32. Conceptual cross section through a spawning riffle to show the effects of flow variation on distributingspawning area to lateral margins of the channel.2.4.2.3. Hydrologic conditions <strong>and</strong>chinook life historyAdaptive responses to the hydrologic regime werecritical elements molding chinook life historystrategies. Not only did streamflow <strong>and</strong> floodsform <strong>and</strong> maintain instream habitat, but chinooksalmon also adapted to the natural variability inmagnitude, timing, duration, <strong>and</strong> frequency ofstreamflow events. Although only relatively smallportions of their lives are spent in the riverenvironment, these life stages are criticallyimportant to the population.We analyzed unregulated hydrograph componentsto examine historical flow patterns with significanceto chinook salmon life history adaptations.These conditions were then compared to thecurrent hydrologic conditions set by the FERCNDPP license amendment in the SettlementAgreement.Immigration <strong>and</strong> spawning. Chinook salmonimmigration <strong>and</strong> spawning occurred during fallbaseflows <strong>and</strong> fall storms of low magnitude <strong>and</strong>short duration. Unimpaired average fall baseflowsranged from 332 cfs to 542 cfs during CriticallyDry <strong>and</strong> Extremely Wet water years, respectively,<strong>and</strong> frequently exceeded 1,000 cfs during wetterwater year types. Variability in streamflow duringthe spawning season, combined with diversechannel topography, provided variation in depth<strong>and</strong> velocity that was an important mechanism todistribute spawning within different channellocations. This mechanism maximized availablespawning habitat (Figure 2-32), <strong>and</strong> probablyreduced scour <strong>and</strong> superimposition mortality onincubating eggs.Minimum streamflows during the spawningseason are now determined by the FSA flowschedule (Table 2-5), which sets steady, nonfluctuatingflow releases, <strong>and</strong> does not incorporatehistorical streamflow variability. The effectsof flow regulation on the hydrograph duringspawning can be seen by comparing representativeunimpaired <strong>and</strong> regulated water years (Figure 2-33). Regulation of fall baseflows at unnaturallylow streamflows may produce the undesirableconsequence of limiting spawning to the center ofthe channel as opposed to margin habitat (Figure2-32), encouraging salmon to construct theirredds on top of pre-existing redds (redd superimposition),<strong>and</strong> increasing the vulnerability of eggpockets to scour during moderate or large floods.59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!