EXECUTIVE SUMMARY1. Introduction1.1 This study, which h<strong>as</strong> been undertaken for <strong>Sa</strong>-<strong>Dhan</strong>, New Delhi on behalf of ICCOand Cordaid, supplements studies undertaken by I/C Consult on the self-<strong>help</strong> group(SHG) landscape <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong> (Bosch, 2001; & Bosch and Damen, 2000). It analyses therole and development of SHGs <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>termediation <strong>in</strong> rural <strong>India</strong>.1.2 The pr<strong>in</strong>cipal objective of the study is to contribute to a consistent and relevantfund<strong>in</strong>g policy for ICCO and Cordaid. It seeks to achieve an understand<strong>in</strong>g of “bestpractice” <strong>in</strong> SHG development <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong> and to <strong>help</strong> direct donor funds formicrof<strong>in</strong>ance (MF).1.3 The study addresses three ma<strong>in</strong> issues:• Efficiency: What can be said about the average cost of SHG promotion both with andwithout emph<strong>as</strong>is on social and political empowerment? What difference does thecredit plus approach make to average SHG promotion costs?• Effectiveness: What is known through results of <strong>as</strong>sessment studies of the effects andimpact of SHG promotion? What is known about the results of monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicatorsof impact?• Susta<strong>in</strong>ability: What k<strong>in</strong>d of susta<strong>in</strong>ability or ph<strong>as</strong>e out strategy is employed byNGOs?1.4. The study is b<strong>as</strong>ed on a review of literature on SHGs, the experiences of sevenlead<strong>in</strong>g NGOs <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the formation of SHGs and <strong>in</strong>terviews with chief executivesand staff of a dozen other major NGOs/ projects promot<strong>in</strong>g SHGs.2. SHG Development <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong>: An Overview2.1 While the term ‘self-<strong>help</strong> group’ or SHG can be used to describe a wide range off<strong>in</strong>ancial and non-f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>as</strong>sociations, <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong> it h<strong>as</strong> come to refer to a form ofAccumulat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Sa</strong>v<strong>in</strong>g and Credit Association (ASCA) promoted by government agencies,NGOs or banks. These groups manage and lend their accumulated sav<strong>in</strong>gs and externallyleveraged funds to their members.2.2 SHGs have varied orig<strong>in</strong>s, mostly <strong>as</strong> part of <strong>in</strong>tegrated development programmes runby NGOs with donor support. The major programme <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>termediationby SHGs is the SHG-bank L<strong>in</strong>kage Programme. This Programme w<strong>as</strong> launched <strong>in</strong> 1992by National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), the apex bank forrural development <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong>. By March 2002, the programme covered 7.8 million familieswith 90 per cent women members. On-time repayment of loans w<strong>as</strong> over 95% for banksparticipat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the programme. It also <strong>in</strong>volved 2,155 non-government organizationsvi
(NGOs) and other self-<strong>help</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutions. NABARD’s corporate mission is tomake available microf<strong>in</strong>ance services to 20 million poor households, or one-third of thepoor <strong>in</strong> the country, by 2008. However, there is at present a high degree of concentration<strong>in</strong> the southern states, with just two states, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu account<strong>in</strong>gfor more than 66% of the SHGs l<strong>in</strong>ked to banks.2.3 The outreach of SHG-bank l<strong>in</strong>kage may seem impressive, but <strong>in</strong> the context of themagnitude of poverty <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong> and the flow of funds for poverty alleviation, it represents avery small <strong>in</strong>tervention. Only about one-third of the SHG members are able to accessloans out of external funds <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itial years. Thus of 4.5 million families covered byMarch 2001, only 1.5 million would have received a loan of an average of Rs. 3,000 atpresent. Disbursements under the poverty-focused self-employment programme SwarnaJayanti Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY), meant for families below the poverty l<strong>in</strong>e, were Rs.642.34 crores * dur<strong>in</strong>g 2000-2001, <strong>as</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>st Rs. 250.62 crores under bank l<strong>in</strong>kage.2.4 Apart from NABARD, about half a dozen other apex bodies or wholesalers provideloans to f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>termediaries for on-lend<strong>in</strong>g to SHGs. These <strong>in</strong>clude the SmallIndustries Development Bank of <strong>India</strong> (SIDBI), R<strong>as</strong>htriya Mahila Kosh (RMK), Hous<strong>in</strong>gand Urban Development Corporation (HUDCO), Hous<strong>in</strong>g Development F<strong>in</strong>anceCorporation (HDFC) and Friends of Women’s World Bank<strong>in</strong>g (FWWB). Donors andbanks, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Rabobank, also provide grants and loans to microf<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>in</strong>stitutions(MFIs) for on-lend<strong>in</strong>g to SHGs and federations of SHGs.2.5 The lead<strong>in</strong>g SHG-promot<strong>in</strong>g NGOs constitute a mixed group that <strong>in</strong>cludes both pureSHG promoters <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> NGOs operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>as</strong> MFIs. They have developed a variety of<strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangements, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cooperatives, to provide access to f<strong>in</strong>ancial servicesto the poor, particularly women.3. Paths of SHG Development: NGO Strategies and Structures for <strong>F<strong>in</strong>ancial</strong>Intermediation3.1 L<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g SHGs directly to banks is the b<strong>as</strong>ic model <strong>in</strong> which an SHG, promoted by anNGO or other <strong>in</strong>stitution, can access a multiple of its sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the form of loan funds ora c<strong>as</strong>h credit limit from the local rural bank. The SHG onlends the funds it accesses frombanks to its members. The bank l<strong>in</strong>kage model a sav<strong>in</strong>gs-led model, with a m<strong>in</strong>imumsav<strong>in</strong>gs period of 6 months prior to the availability of bank credit. The quantum of creditavailable to SHGs starts from parity with sav<strong>in</strong>gs and can <strong>in</strong>cre<strong>as</strong>e to eight times the levelof SHG sav<strong>in</strong>gs.3.2 The SHG-bank l<strong>in</strong>kage model provides the cheapest and most direct source of funds.However, this h<strong>as</strong> to be set aga<strong>in</strong>st the low volume of funds that available through thischannel <strong>in</strong> view of the l<strong>in</strong>kage of credit with SHG sav<strong>in</strong>gs. Further, the SHG is notnecessarily the appropriate unit for organis<strong>in</strong>g a host of other community-b<strong>as</strong>ed f<strong>in</strong>ancialand non-f<strong>in</strong>ancial services. Many lead<strong>in</strong>g NGOs have formed federations of SHGs for* 1 crore = 10 million; 1 lakh = 1,00,000; 100 lakhs = 1 crorevii
- Page 4 and 5: List of AcronymsAIAMEDAIMSAPMASASAA
- Page 8 and 9: self-management by members and scal
- Page 10 and 11: 6.4 On the other hand field reports
- Page 12 and 13: sustainable self-help groups. An in
- Page 14 and 15: 2. DEVELOPMENT OF SELF-HELP GROUPS
- Page 16 and 17: average loan per SHG was Rs. 18,227
- Page 18 and 19: • training and sensitising bank o
- Page 20 and 21: organizational structure and the na
- Page 22 and 23: Table 2.1 (contd.)S.No.ParticularsN
- Page 24 and 25: the SHG from banks starts from pari
- Page 26 and 27: • In either situation SHGs can co
- Page 28 and 29: 3.2.3 SHG Federations Linked to MF
- Page 32 and 33: 3.4 ConclusionThis section served t
- Page 34 and 35: MYRADA,Karnatakaa.o.OUTREACH,Karnat
- Page 36 and 37: Name ofNGO/StateDHANFoundation,Tami
- Page 38 and 39: However, for a comparative analysis
- Page 40 and 41: linkages with credit and savings 34
- Page 42 and 43: out of 5,153 SHGs covered under the
- Page 44 and 45: eceived revolving fund grants, cost
- Page 46 and 47: the high level of educated unemploy
- Page 48 and 49: CARE-CASHE Project(A.P.)(implemente
- Page 50 and 51: Holy CrossSocial ServiceCentre(HCSS
- Page 52 and 53: Agency/Programme5. Rashtriya Mahila
- Page 54 and 55: microfinance intermediary 41 . Unde
- Page 56 and 57:
On the other hand, there is evidenc
- Page 58 and 59:
infrastructural and other constrain
- Page 60 and 61:
would not be possible while working
- Page 62 and 63:
through the SHG as a basis to sourc
- Page 64 and 65:
the programme is particularly probl
- Page 66 and 67:
It is possible to query the methodo
- Page 68 and 69:
world. Other partners from India ar
- Page 70 and 71:
RECOMMENDATIONSIt is not clear what
- Page 72 and 73:
REFERENCESAIAMED (2000), Good Pract
- Page 75:
Mahajan, Vijay and G. Nagasri (1999
- Page 79 and 80:
Appendix 2: Types of SHGsTypes of S
- Page 81 and 82:
Appendix 3 (contd.)OrganisationSIDB
- Page 83 and 84:
4. Trade based Group model: The est
- Page 85 and 86:
Appendix 5S.No.1. JOTHI 92,077.00
- Page 87:
Appendix 6: Stages of Evolution of