11.07.2015 Views

View - Universidad de Almería

View - Universidad de Almería

View - Universidad de Almería

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

200 Blas Pelegrín, Pascual Fernán<strong>de</strong>z, Juani L. Redondo, Pilar M. Ortigosa, and I. Garcíathe facilities location (see [6] ), thus the location-price problem becomes a location problemwhen firms charge equilibrium prices. To our knowledge, the resultant location problem onlyhas been studied in discrete space and it will be referred here as the MAXPROFIT problem(see [4]).The aim of this paper is to show that the above mentioned problems can be formulatedin the same framework and solved by using the same type of algorithms. By using integerlinear programming formulations of the problems, standard optimizers can be applied to findoptimal solutions to mo<strong>de</strong>rated size problems. By <strong>de</strong>termining its fitness functions, heuristicsalgorithms can be used to get good solutions for large size problems. We propose a newgenetic algorithm with subpopulation support, GASUB , which is related to a previous algorithmgiven in [9]. The new algorithm is compared with the multi-start substitution heuristic,MSH, a procedure wi<strong>de</strong>ly used for many combinatorial location problems (see [2]).2. The location problems formulationWe will use the following notation when necessary:i, I = 1, 2, ..., n In<strong>de</strong>x and collection of <strong>de</strong>mand pointsj, J = 1, 2, ..., m In<strong>de</strong>x and potential sites for facility locationk, K = 1, 2, ..., q In<strong>de</strong>x and pre-existing facility locationsw iDemand (or buying power) at point id ijDistance between <strong>de</strong>mand point i and point jD i = min{d ik : k ∈ K} Distance from <strong>de</strong>mand point i to the closest pre-existing facilityN < i = {j ∈ J : d ij < D i} Collection of potential locations for servers that are closer to point ithan the closest pre-existing facilityN i = = {j ∈ J : d ij = D i} Collection of potential locations for servers that are at the same distanceto point i than the closest pre-existing facilityI ∗ = {i ∈ I : N < i ∪ N i = ≠ ∅} Collection of <strong>de</strong>mand points that have at least one potential location forserver closer or at the same distance than the pre-existing facilitiestUnit transportation costsNumber of new facilities to be builtIn the p-MEDIAN problem, there is no pre-existing facility in the market (K = ∅) and theobjective is to minimize total transportation cost between <strong>de</strong>mand points and their closestfacilities. The following <strong>de</strong>cision variables are <strong>de</strong>fined:{1 if a new facility is opened in jy j =0 otherwisex ij = proportion of <strong>de</strong>mand at i served from site jThen the problem is formulated as follows:⎧ ∑min tw i d ij x ij⎪⎨(P 1 )⎪⎩s.t.∑ i∈I j∈J∑j∈Jx ij = 1,i ∈ Ix ij ≤ y j , i ∈ I, j ∈ J∑y j = sj∈Jx ij ≥ 0y j ∈ {0, 1}In MAXCAP, there already exist some competing pre-existing facilities. Customer pays fortransportation and buys at its closest facility. If a new facility and a pre-existing facility are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!