11.07.2015 Views

View - Universidad de Almería

View - Universidad de Almería

View - Universidad de Almería

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceedings of GO 2005, pp. 47 – 52.Calibration of a Gravity–Opportunity Mo<strong>de</strong>lof Trip Distribution by a HybridProcedure of Global OptimizationEdson Ta<strong>de</strong>u Bez, 1 Mirian Buss Gonçalves, 2 and José Eduardo Souza <strong>de</strong> Cursi 31 <strong>Universidad</strong>e do Vale do Itajaí - UNIVALI, São José, Brasil, edsonbez@univali.br2 <strong>Universidad</strong>e Fe<strong>de</strong>ral <strong>de</strong> Santa Catarina - UFSC, Florianópolis, Brasil, mirian@mtm.ufsc.br3 Laboratoire <strong>de</strong> Mécanique <strong>de</strong> Rouen (INSA - Rouen), Saint-Etienne du Rouvray, France, souza@insa-rouen.frAbstractKeywords:In this work, we present a hybrid global optimization method of evolutionary type. The procedureuses random perturbations of <strong>de</strong>scent methods in the mutation step and generates the initialpopulation by using a Representation Formula of the global optimum. The method is applied toa relevant inverse problem: the calibration of a gravity–opportunity mo<strong>de</strong>l for trip distribution intransportation theory.Global Optimization, Hybrid Methods, Gravity–Opportunity Mo<strong>de</strong>l1. IntroductionTransportation planning is a field where the calibration of mo<strong>de</strong>ls is often used. In typicalsituations, the mathematical mo<strong>de</strong>l to be used contains parameters to be <strong>de</strong>termined fromempiric data by i<strong>de</strong>ntification procedures. Generally, these procedures lead to non convexoptimization problems and robust numerical methods are nee<strong>de</strong>d in the calibration process.We consi<strong>de</strong>r in this work the calibration of a gravity–opportunity mo<strong>de</strong>l which is <strong>de</strong>rived byapplying the Maximum Likelihood Principle to the experimental data, such as, for instance,measurements of O-D (origin-<strong>de</strong>stination) trips (see, for instance, [5]). Such a mo<strong>de</strong>l leads tofunction exhibiting the typical behaviour shown in Figure 1. Previous works [3, 6, 7] properlyaddressed the numerical difficulties in the calibration procedure, which are essentially connected,on the one hand, to the nonconvexity and, on the other hand, to the wi<strong>de</strong> sensibility ofthe objective function with respect to the parameters to be <strong>de</strong>termined: large <strong>de</strong>sequilibratedgradients are involved. We present here a hybrid global optimization procedure for solvingthe problem. The method has been tested on classical functions such as Rastringin’s one (Figure2) [4] and it is applied here to the calibration of a gravity–opportunity mo<strong>de</strong>l from O-Dsources [5]. In this field, the standard procedures are difficulty to use, request high computationaleffort and uses optimization parameters specially <strong>de</strong>fined for a given data set. Amongour objectives, we look for the <strong>de</strong>finition of a calibration procedure less <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt on the dataset and saving computational cost.2. The Trip Distribution Mo<strong>de</strong>lBy limitation of the room, we do not give more <strong>de</strong>tailed <strong>de</strong>rivation of the mo<strong>de</strong>l: the rea<strong>de</strong>rinterested in this aspect is invited to refer to [5]. Let us <strong>de</strong>note by T ij the number of trips going

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!