established practice among farmers, was set aside when chemical fertilizersbecame available. Farmers thought that with fertilizers, there was no moreneed for FYM. They did not realize the complementary nature <strong>of</strong> the two, andit was thus necessary to correct this mis<strong>in</strong>formation.The impact po<strong>in</strong>t for proper weed<strong>in</strong>g was necessitated by improper tillageoperations. A properly tilled plot with good water management seldomrequired weed<strong>in</strong>g. In this perspective, these two impact po<strong>in</strong>ts were related.Proper dra<strong>in</strong>age and irrigation or keep<strong>in</strong>g an adequate level <strong>of</strong> water underra<strong>in</strong>fed <strong>rice</strong> cultivation was a technique the farmers had learned through theyears.Control <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>sects and diseases was especially critical <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> newly<strong>in</strong>troduced MVs that were prone to <strong>in</strong>sect and disease attack when givenhigher doses <strong>of</strong> fertilizer.The last impact po<strong>in</strong>t—m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g losses—was essential as farmers usedto delay harvest<strong>in</strong>g (because <strong>of</strong> labor shortage) without realiz<strong>in</strong>g the magnitude<strong>of</strong> losses <strong>in</strong>curred. These losses could be substantial, s<strong>in</strong>ce their judgment<strong>of</strong> the right harvest time was always 5-10 d <strong>of</strong>f the optimum.The BSPP and the Farmers’ Assiayones provided the political leadership,while the state agencies assisted <strong>in</strong> every possible way to successfully implementWTRPP. At the township level, a Township Party Unit provided politicalleadership, and the Township People’s Council, assisted by AC, supervisedWTRPP implementation. S<strong>in</strong>ce the members <strong>of</strong> the Township Party Unit andthe People’s Council belonged to the township, they were familiar with thephysical, biological, social, and economic milieu <strong>of</strong> their constituents. Theywere authorized to coord<strong>in</strong>ate the activities <strong>of</strong> the various government agencieswith<strong>in</strong> the township and make decisions about program implementation. ATownship Extension Manager, with his staff <strong>of</strong> extension workers, took anactive role <strong>in</strong> technology transfer and <strong>in</strong>put distribution. Each VEM supervised800 ha (or approximately 300 farm families); this compared favorably with thenational average <strong>of</strong> 1500 ha.Selectivity and concentrationOn the national scale, agricultural sector <strong>in</strong>vestment had <strong>in</strong>creased, but itsshare relative to the <strong>in</strong>dustrial sector rema<strong>in</strong>ed small. Rather than spread thelimited resources equally but th<strong>in</strong>ly, the strategy opted to use all resources <strong>in</strong>areas where there was high probability <strong>of</strong> success. Selectivity was applied <strong>in</strong>terms <strong>of</strong> locality, <strong>rice</strong> variety, extension personnel, and management method.Townships with manageable size, reasonably good physical conditions, andaccessibility were selected. From the research results, exotic and local <strong>rice</strong>varieties were selected to suit chosen localities. Selectivity <strong>of</strong> extension personnel<strong>in</strong>volved choos<strong>in</strong>g young, active, <strong>in</strong>novative team workers with the rightattitude toward the farmers. Other criteria <strong>in</strong>cluded technical capability,imag<strong>in</strong>ation, diligence, and appreciation <strong>of</strong> the farmer’s life.RICE PRODUCTION UNDER THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC GOVERNMENT 87
Mass participationThe new technology had a high labor requirement. However, rural population<strong>in</strong>creased at a faster pace than did area expansion. There was rural underemploymentbecause agriculture, be<strong>in</strong>g seasonal, demanded more labor at aspecific time-more than what the locality could provide. This was especiallytrue <strong>of</strong> transplant<strong>in</strong>g and harvest<strong>in</strong>g, the two most labor-consum<strong>in</strong>g operations<strong>in</strong> <strong>rice</strong> cultivation. The new technology required transplant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 25- to30-day-old seedl<strong>in</strong>gs at twice the number <strong>of</strong> plant<strong>in</strong>g hills. The high laborrequirement was met by voluntary exchange <strong>of</strong> labor among villages ortownships as organized by the People’s Councils. A mass movement <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>gstudents and other workers was likewise mobilized. Musicians and dancerswere among the volunteer labor who provided enterta<strong>in</strong>ment through songsand dances depict<strong>in</strong>g MV cultivation (Fig. 11, 12). Agriculture, be<strong>in</strong>g the ma<strong>in</strong>sector <strong>of</strong> the country’s economy, drew the attention <strong>of</strong> the masses; its progresswas everybody’s concern.Demonstration and competitionThe strategy encouraged farmers to demonstrate their capability <strong>in</strong> <strong>rice</strong>production by compet<strong>in</strong>g with each other <strong>in</strong> such activities as transplant<strong>in</strong>g,harvest<strong>in</strong>g, and maximiz<strong>in</strong>g yield. These competitions among farmers andamong townships tested their capabilities to the fullest. Township People’sCouncils awarded prizes to farmers who excelled <strong>in</strong> <strong>rice</strong> production (Fig. 13).The AC provided prizes to townships that gave the best performance <strong>in</strong> theprogram.11. Voluntary labor contribution.88 A CENTURY OF RICE IMPROVEMENT IN BURMA
- Page 3 and 4:
The International Rice Research Ins
- Page 5 and 6:
Rice trading 29Rice milling 29Rice
- Page 8:
ForewordRice dominates Burma’s ec
- Page 11 and 12:
ice production in the last decade.
- Page 14 and 15:
CHAPTER IIntroductionBurma is situa
- Page 16 and 17:
1. Trends in rice area and producti
- Page 18 and 19:
3. Soil distribution.INTRODUCTION 5
- Page 20 and 21:
and the rest of the country in 1885
- Page 22 and 23:
Rice production growth during this
- Page 24 and 25:
4. Rice threshing with cattle.5. Ri
- Page 26 and 27:
7. Transplanting.Farmers classify r
- Page 28:
8. States and Divisions (1-7 are di
- Page 43:
Table 11. Rice mills, 1894-1934 (DA
- Page 51 and 52: Rice area and productionAlthough th
- Page 53 and 54: Table 16. Rice production in select
- Page 55 and 56: Tenants of State Agricultural BankA
- Page 57 and 58: in 1960, representing a 17% increas
- Page 59: Table 20. Summary of extension acti
- Page 62 and 63: Table 24. Rice procurement by diffe
- Page 64 and 65: This trade reduction severely affec
- Page 66: conditions and a weak international
- Page 69 and 70: the design, implementation, and eva
- Page 71 and 72: Table 27 indicates the areas plante
- Page 73 and 74: The coastal zone comprised four ric
- Page 78 and 79: In the meantime, local researchers
- Page 80 and 81: Table 35. Rice area planted, by gra
- Page 83 and 84: All fertilizers were imported until
- Page 85 and 86: points, 3) availability of cash amo
- Page 87 and 88: hispa Hispa armigera. Though annual
- Page 89 and 90: The amounts of agricultural loans g
- Page 91 and 92: from double-cropped areas (Table 44
- Page 93 and 94: when investment in the agricultural
- Page 96 and 97: The program brought research and ex
- Page 98 and 99: Table 46. Average area of responsib
- Page 102 and 103: 12. Voluntary labor harvesting rice
- Page 104 and 105: of harvesting. It sought voluntary
- Page 106 and 107: nents that a larger project would r
- Page 108 and 109: Table 48. Changes in area planted t
- Page 110 and 111: Table 50. Average yield and product
- Page 112 and 113: Results of analysisOf the variables
- Page 114 and 115: Of the 19 variables used, 11 were s
- Page 116 and 117: weather that it influenced rice pro
- Page 118 and 119: Table 54. Present level of technolo
- Page 120 and 121: size of holdings, 40% of the prize
- Page 122 and 123: average yield at that time was 2.20
- Page 124 and 125: Table 59. Monthly transactions of t
- Page 126 and 127: Table 61. Irrigated areas for rice,
- Page 128 and 129: Table 62. Tillage operation by trac
- Page 130 and 131: 18. AFPTC rice procurement center.A
- Page 132 and 133: Table 65. Annual rice procurement (
- Page 134 and 135: for seeds; still others sold their
- Page 136 and 137: primarily to help achieve the AFPTC
- Page 138 and 139: Table 67. Annual rice production an
- Page 140 and 141: Table 68. Comparison of paid-out co
- Page 142 and 143: CHAPTER VImplications for the futur
- Page 144 and 145: agricultural research can be brough
- Page 146 and 147: Motivation of scientistsUnder these
- Page 148 and 149: or as individuals. Research is to b
- Page 150 and 151:
CHAPTER VIConclusionsBurma’s econ
- Page 152 and 153:
References citedAdas M (1974) The B
- Page 154:
SRUB—The socialist Republic of th
- Page 157 and 158:
Appendix 1 continuedSown area Produ
- Page 159 and 160:
Appendix II continuedShareRice a Al
- Page 161 and 162:
Appendix IV continuedYear Exports Y
- Page 163 and 164:
Appendix VIcontinuedVariable Symbol
- Page 165 and 166:
All combined1977-84 1977-78 1978-79
- Page 167 and 168:
Appendix VIII. Correlation coeffici
- Page 170 and 171:
IndexAdas, M 6Africa 125, 137Agricu
- Page 172 and 173:
farmers 6-9, 13, 18, 23, 25-26, 29,
- Page 174 and 175:
Okpo Small Loan Department110, 111O