11.07.2015 Views

A century of rice improvement in Burma - IRRI books - International ...

A century of rice improvement in Burma - IRRI books - International ...

A century of rice improvement in Burma - IRRI books - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 68. Comparison <strong>of</strong> paid-out cost <strong>of</strong> traditional and new technology (percent<strong>of</strong> production).Particular 1932 1960Traditional1981NewPaid-out costHired laborHired animal laborSeedFertilizerManureLand rent8446104--405753135--283262129683305110915132Sources: Department reports, Agricultural Corporation (various years).period, a farmer needed to pay only 30% <strong>of</strong> his output as paid-out cost,enabl<strong>in</strong>g him to reta<strong>in</strong> 70% as his share.With traditional technology, 62% <strong>of</strong> these paid-out costs were used forhired labor, 6% for fertilizers, and 8% for manure; 3% covered the nom<strong>in</strong>al landtax levied by the government. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g figures for the new technologywere 51, 15, 13, and 2%, respectively. (Land rent was greatly reduced <strong>in</strong> thethird period because <strong>of</strong> the abolition <strong>of</strong> the landlord class.)In this period, farmers undoubtedly benefited from the new technology.A high percentage <strong>of</strong> produce enjoyed by hired labor showed a favorabledistribution <strong>of</strong> output among the landless farmers. The new technologyneeded more labor than did the traditional practice and subsequently, providedmore opportunities for rural employment. The <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g labor <strong>in</strong>put generatedgreater <strong>rice</strong> output, which was then distributed reasonably well to thelandless workers. Aside from farmers, the laborers were likewise benefited bythe new technologyImpactScience generated rapid <strong>rice</strong> production growth dur<strong>in</strong>g the period, especially<strong>in</strong> the late 1970s and early 1980s when WTRPP ga<strong>in</strong>ed momentum. Butlimitations <strong>in</strong> foreign exchange and the exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>frastructure—which forcedan annual <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g demand for fertilizer—lessened the impact. MVs replacedlocal varieties <strong>in</strong> almost all favorable areas; the adverse environmentsrequired newer MVs adaptable to the situation.The role <strong>of</strong> farmers <strong>in</strong> the country’s drive for higher agricultural productionwas widely appreciated. Unity among farmers organized under theFarmers’ Assiayones helped elevate their status <strong>in</strong> society. Many rural projectson water supply, health and sanitation education, cooperatives, and other<strong>in</strong>frastructure affirmed public recognition <strong>of</strong> their services. Introduction <strong>of</strong> thehealth and accident <strong>in</strong>surance system for draft cattle purchased under MABloans encouraged farmers to take more risks. There were some plans toRICE PRODUCTION UNDER THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC GOVERNMENT 127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!