- Page 3 and 4: The International Rice Research Ins
- Page 5: Rice trading 29Rice milling 29Rice
- Page 10 and 11: PrefaceRice is Burma’s most impor
- Page 12: Abbreviations and acronymsAC = Agri
- Page 15 and 16: Table 1. Mean annual precipitation
- Page 17 and 18: 2. Rainfall distribution.4 A CENTUR
- Page 19 and 20: Due to the involvement of a huge la
- Page 21 and 22: The equity of production, however,
- Page 23 and 24: ogy was slow and unenthusiastic in
- Page 25 and 26: 6. Tillage using a wooden spike-har
- Page 27 and 28: Classification based on water regim
- Page 33: these favorable conditions, the hig
- Page 50 and 51: CHAPTER IllRice production under th
- Page 52 and 53: intervention, in the form of agricu
- Page 54 and 55: Table 17. Fertilizer consumption of
- Page 56 and 57:
of 100-400% per annum, still played
- Page 58 and 59:
kyats (Walinsky 1962). Investments
- Page 61 and 62:
Rice tradingAt the end of World War
- Page 63 and 64:
hectare would produce enough rice f
- Page 65 and 66:
Stability and sustainabilityThe ste
- Page 68 and 69:
CHAPTER IVRice production under the
- Page 70 and 71:
aise production to the highest poss
- Page 72 and 73:
Table 28. Rice area and population,
- Page 74:
Table 31. Rice yield in selected ye
- Page 79 and 80:
The areas devoted to MVs in selecte
- Page 81:
Table 36. Distribution of improved
- Page 84 and 85:
The rates of fertilizer calculated
- Page 86 and 87:
Y = 2447 + 13.65 N - 0.073 N 2Y = 2
- Page 88 and 89:
Extensive use of agrochemicals with
- Page 90 and 91:
this period, credit could be consid
- Page 92 and 93:
tional framework reestablished duri
- Page 94:
Organization assisted ARI by provid
- Page 97 and 98:
work in experimental plots endowed
- Page 99 and 100:
such a practice, resources were spr
- Page 101 and 102:
Mass participationThe new technolog
- Page 103 and 104:
14. Production camp at Hmawbi towns
- Page 105 and 106:
Many slogans explaining the objecti
- Page 107 and 108:
involvement of more townships repre
- Page 109 and 110:
program, without the program (WOP),
- Page 111 and 112:
Yield in kg/ha was used as the depe
- Page 113 and 114:
cant impact on yield. (The average
- Page 115 and 116:
variables at the 5% level) with an
- Page 117 and 118:
places. Areas with late rainfall ha
- Page 119 and 120:
“ignorant” of farm conditions.
- Page 121 and 122:
preprogram years increased to about
- Page 123 and 124:
the labor requirement from the hous
- Page 125 and 126:
the fourth group, exercising a comm
- Page 127 and 128:
exhausted after one season of rice
- Page 129 and 130:
aised cropping intensity was theref
- Page 131 and 132:
The price variation was due to the
- Page 133 and 134:
were used by AFPTC to set procureme
- Page 135 and 136:
Table 66. Rice mills and their mill
- Page 137 and 138:
diction. The question of sustaining
- Page 139 and 140:
Beneficiaries of productionThe peri
- Page 141 and 142:
introduce a crop insurance scheme t
- Page 143 and 144:
to improve the plight of farmers. R
- Page 145 and 146:
Farmer participatory research is of
- Page 147 and 148:
collected from township headquarter
- Page 149 and 150:
source-poor farmers to secure bette
- Page 151 and 152:
attention. It would be wasteful to
- Page 153 and 154:
Khin Win, Kyaw-Shin, Htin Aung (197
- Page 156 and 157:
AppendicesAppendix I. Sown area and
- Page 158 and 159:
Appendix II continuedShareRice a Al
- Page 160 and 161:
Appendix III continuedGross Cattle
- Page 162 and 163:
Appendix VI. Changes in variable me
- Page 164 and 165:
Appendix VII. Means and standard de
- Page 166 and 167:
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mea
- Page 168:
Conversion factors1 kilogram (kg)1
- Page 171 and 172:
Bangladesh 1, 70Barker, R A 31, 34,
- Page 173 and 174:
Kachin 15, 59, 65, 94kanzo 19kaing
- Page 175:
Sri Lanka 32-33, 50, 66, 124State A