| <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> <strong>transparency</strong> <strong>under</strong> <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 2006 | iExecutive SummaryUK-based companies are required by <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 2006 to publishannual accounts <strong>and</strong> reports. The law in this area 1 mainly seeks to keepshareholders informed of <strong>the</strong> company’s performance that year, mattersthat have had bearing on <strong>the</strong> company’s performance <strong>and</strong> position thatyear, <strong>and</strong> matters that may do in <strong>the</strong> future. The requirements are alsointended to allow shareholders to see whe<strong>the</strong>r company management arelooking after <strong>the</strong>ir investment properly, <strong>and</strong> how <strong>the</strong>y are performing in<strong>the</strong>ir statutory duties.Legal requirements <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards set out <strong>the</strong> information that companiesmust account <strong>and</strong> report. These requirements include explicit obligationsfor some types of company to account <strong>and</strong> report information aboutenvironmental <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> issues, policies <strong>and</strong> impacts, but only where<strong>the</strong>y have implications for <strong>the</strong> company’s business.<strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> issues have implications for many companies’businesses, in many different ways. The way that companies approach<strong>the</strong>m will be fundamental to <strong>the</strong>ir long-term business success. TheCompanies Act 2006 established a legal framework for reporting thatrecognised this, but <strong>the</strong>re is currently a lack of detail in <strong>the</strong> requirements,which <strong>under</strong>mines <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> framework. Specifically, reputation,<strong>social</strong> licence to operate, regulatory freedom, access to capital <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> risk of litigation can have substantial implications for businesses, <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong>se success factors can be directly <strong>and</strong> significantly affected by companyenvironmental <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> impacts, interaction <strong>and</strong> performance.There is a need for <strong>the</strong> law to explicitly require quoted companies toreport in relation to <strong>the</strong>se intangible assets <strong>and</strong> risks where relevant,<strong>and</strong> on <strong>the</strong> environmental <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> issues that may have implicationsfor <strong>the</strong>m. This information is already required by law, but clearer <strong>and</strong>more detailed requirements are needed to ensure that company practicereaches <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard envisioned by policy, <strong>and</strong> that certainty is providedto companies when reporting.Reporting requirements covering <strong>the</strong>se matters are not against <strong>the</strong> interestsof business – on <strong>the</strong> contrary, companies that have a grip on <strong>the</strong> waysin which environmental <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> issues interact with <strong>the</strong>ir business, <strong>and</strong>
ii | <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> <strong>transparency</strong> <strong>under</strong> <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 2006| iiiwhich engage with <strong>and</strong> discuss <strong>the</strong>m effectively, will be <strong>the</strong> best-placed tosucceed in <strong>the</strong> future.“[In <strong>the</strong> next 50 years] successful companies will be those who embed<strong>social</strong>, environmental, <strong>and</strong> ethical risk management into <strong>the</strong>ir corebusiness processes <strong>and</strong> performance measures.” 2- John Browne, former Director of Reputation Assurance,PricewaterhouseCoopersDirectors need to <strong>under</strong>st<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> risks that <strong>the</strong>y are taking <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> impacts<strong>the</strong>y are having on <strong>the</strong> company’s business, <strong>and</strong> how to effectively managethose risks <strong>and</strong> opportunities. Shareholders need to have <strong>the</strong> opportunityto be accurately <strong>and</strong> appropriately informed of <strong>and</strong> engaged with <strong>the</strong>seissues in order to monitor <strong>the</strong> directors’ performance <strong>and</strong> stewardship of<strong>the</strong>ir investment. Investors need to be aware of <strong>the</strong> issues that may havebearing on a potential investment, <strong>and</strong> of <strong>the</strong> quality of management inplace in <strong>the</strong> company. The proper recognition <strong>and</strong> reporting of <strong>the</strong> waythat <strong>the</strong>se issues interact with business in <strong>the</strong> long-term will be essentialto ensuring stable <strong>and</strong> sustainable investor confidence.Company accounts <strong>and</strong> reports are also subjected to scrutiny from anumber of legal mechanisms established <strong>under</strong> <strong>the</strong> Companies Act2006, to ensure that <strong>the</strong> accounts <strong>and</strong> reports comply with <strong>the</strong> relevantrequirements, <strong>and</strong> meet <strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>the</strong>ir users. The key legal mechanismsare:- External audit carried out by private consultants, in accordance withlegal requirements.- Regulatory oversight by <strong>the</strong> Financial Reporting Review Panel (FRRP),<strong>the</strong> independent regulator appointed <strong>and</strong> m<strong>and</strong>ated by statute to monitor<strong>and</strong> ensure compliance with legal requirements.- The laying of accounts <strong>and</strong> reports before <strong>the</strong> company at its AnnualGeneral Meeting, to be subjected to scrutiny <strong>and</strong> questioning fromshareholders.Again, although <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 2006 established <strong>the</strong> legal framework(<strong>the</strong> mechanisms exist) <strong>the</strong>re are fundamental weaknesses that need to beaddressed. <strong>ClientEarth</strong> does not consider that <strong>the</strong>se mechanisms can beeffective or fit for purpose in <strong>the</strong>ir current form. Therefore <strong>ClientEarth</strong>considers that reforms are necessary to provide adequate scrutiny to <strong>the</strong>reporting process.<strong>ClientEarth</strong>’s proposed measures are entirely consistent with <strong>the</strong> UKgovernment’s policy on company law, <strong>and</strong> its ‘light touch’ regulatoryapproach. The proposals strongly support <strong>the</strong> achievement of <strong>the</strong> policyobjectives that <strong>under</strong>pin <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 2006, as grounded in <strong>the</strong>findings <strong>and</strong> views of <strong>the</strong> group of highly esteemed experts, practitioners<strong>and</strong> business people who were given <strong>the</strong> task of setting <strong>the</strong> foundations for<strong>the</strong> Companies Act 2006, <strong>the</strong> Company Law Review. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong>proposals would not impose excessive cost on companies or unnecessarilyinterfere in <strong>the</strong>ir operations.<strong>ClientEarth</strong>’s proposals<strong>ClientEarth</strong> considers that <strong>the</strong> legal framework governing companyreporting on environmental <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> issues is currently inadequate.There is a need for supplemental regulatory <strong>and</strong> governance measures, togive clarity as to what companies are legally required to report, to provideeffective safeguards on <strong>the</strong> exercise of discretion by company directorswhen reporting <strong>the</strong>se matters, <strong>and</strong> to deliver <strong>the</strong> objectives of <strong>the</strong> CompaniesAct 2006.<strong>ClientEarth</strong> considers that three key actions are required in law <strong>and</strong> governanceto reinforce <strong>and</strong> enhance <strong>the</strong> legal framework established by <strong>the</strong>Companies Act 2006:1. Regulations made by <strong>the</strong> Secretary of State <strong>under</strong> section 416(4) <strong>and</strong>468(1) of <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 2006 to clarify <strong>and</strong> better articulate <strong>the</strong>existing reporting obligations of quoted companies <strong>under</strong> section417(5) Companies Act 2006, relating to environmental <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong>issues. Regulations should include:i. Explicit provisions to give substance to <strong>the</strong> types of businessfactor that can be affected by environmental <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> issues.ii. Explicit provisions to outline <strong>the</strong> types of environmental or<strong>social</strong> issue that can be particularly relevant to companies, <strong>and</strong>a structure as to how <strong>the</strong>y must be reported.iii. General provisions to ensure certainty <strong>and</strong> consistency in narrativereporting, requiring balanced, reliable <strong>and</strong> comparableinformation.