12.07.2015 Views

Environmental and social transparency under the ... - ClientEarth

Environmental and social transparency under the ... - ClientEarth

Environmental and social transparency under the ... - ClientEarth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

156 | <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> <strong>transparency</strong> <strong>under</strong> <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 2006| 157- AGM 2008 – Representatives of <strong>the</strong> Mineral Policy Institute (MPI)- AGM 2007 – R. Sreedhar, a geologist, raised <strong>the</strong> company’s allegedlyabuses. 397illegal expansion of its smelter in South India, its polluting impactsin Zambia, <strong>the</strong> heightened prospect of a major penalty for Vedanta’soperations in Armenia (closed by government order); Samarendraattended as proxies <strong>and</strong> raised issues regarding tail dumping at <strong>the</strong>notorious Freeport mine <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir involvement in <strong>the</strong> civil war in Panguna.Das, a journalist from Orissa raised <strong>the</strong> question of Vedanta’s reporteddonations to political parties; representatives of Action Aid questionedA.7.3.2 BHP Billitoncompany claims regarding <strong>the</strong> rehabilitation it had provided to relocatedvillagers in Orissa; tribal representatives Kumuti Majhi <strong>and</strong>Phulme Majhi, attended as proxies, speaking with interpreters about<strong>the</strong> perceived danger to <strong>the</strong>ir livelihoods <strong>and</strong> safety, which <strong>the</strong>y linkedto Vedanta’s operations in Orissa. 395- AGM 2006 (Australia) – Representative of <strong>the</strong> Mineral Policy Instituteattended as a proxy <strong>and</strong> asked a question regarding BHP’s reportedrequested exemption to numerous national laws in South Australia. 399- AGM 2008 – Despite a press ban, <strong>the</strong> journalist Peter Popham wasable to gain access to <strong>the</strong> AGM as a proxy, in order to provide a pressaccount of <strong>the</strong> directors’ response to questions from numerous tribalrepresentatives in attendance, relating to <strong>the</strong> controversies of Vedanta’ssubsidiary’s operations in Orissa, India. 396A.7.3 Examples of relevant practice outside of <strong>the</strong> UKHere we will briefly examine some examples of this practice in <strong>the</strong> meetingsof <strong>the</strong> same company groups, held in o<strong>the</strong>r host states. While <strong>the</strong>seevents did not take place <strong>under</strong> UK law, <strong>the</strong>y were permitted withoutresistance by company groups based in <strong>the</strong> UK, <strong>and</strong> thus are of relevancein <strong>under</strong>st<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> degree to which this practice is accepted by UKcompanies.A.7.3.1 Rio Tinto- AGM 1998 (Australia) – Representatives of International Federation ofChemical, Energy, Mine <strong>and</strong> General Workers’ Unions (ICEM), environmentgroups <strong>and</strong> indigenous people’s organisations attended <strong>and</strong>spoke using proxy rights or by buying small shares.- AGM 2006 – Spokesperson for Papuan asylum seekers spoke as aproxy, regarding <strong>the</strong> alleged direct links between operations at <strong>the</strong>Freeport mine (in which Rio Tinto has a 40% share) <strong>and</strong> human rights

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!