158 | <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> <strong>transparency</strong> <strong>under</strong> <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 2006Notes | 159Notes1As relating to quoted companies.2PricewaterhouseCoopers, ‘Surveys Find Many Consumers Hold Companies Responsiblefor Their Actions’ (30 September 1999), quoted in D Neef, Managing Corporate Reputation<strong>and</strong> Risk: A Strategic Approach Using Knowledge Management (2003), p. 37.3The Financial Services Authority (FSA) also sets rules that govern UK-based companies on<strong>the</strong> London Stock Exchange. These now cover <strong>transparency</strong> <strong>and</strong> reporting requirements.However, <strong>the</strong>y will not play a role in <strong>the</strong> main body of <strong>the</strong> review, because <strong>the</strong>ir environmental<strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> reporting requirements have application to a smaller class of companiesthan <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 2006 (all of which are covered by <strong>the</strong> Companies Act), <strong>and</strong> are notas stringent. This issue is examined in fur<strong>the</strong>r detail in Annex 1.4For examples of such studies, see: R Moody, Rocks & Hard Places: The Globalization ofMining (2007) for an extremely thorough account of global <strong>social</strong> <strong>and</strong> environmental injusticeslinked to <strong>the</strong> mining industry; <strong>the</strong> Norwegian Council on Ethics’ ‘Recommendation of15 May 2007’ on <strong>the</strong> operations of Vedanta Resources (a recommendation which resulted in<strong>the</strong> Norwegian Government Pension Fund divesting from Vedanta), or ‘Recommendationof 15 February 2008’ on <strong>the</strong> Rio Tinto Group (which also resulted in divestment); War onWant, ‘Anglo-American: The Alternative Report’ (August 2007).Proposals5“The Secretary of State may make provision by regulations as to o<strong>the</strong>r matters that must bedisclosed in a directors’ report”.6“The summary financial statement must be in such form, <strong>and</strong> contain such information, as<strong>the</strong> Secretary of State may specify by regulations. The regulations may require <strong>the</strong> statementto include information derived from <strong>the</strong> directors’ report”.7“(1) The Secretary of State may make provision by regulations about— (a) <strong>the</strong> accounts <strong>and</strong>reports that companies are required to prepare; (b) <strong>the</strong> categories of companies required toprepare accounts <strong>and</strong> reports of any description; (c) <strong>the</strong> form <strong>and</strong> content of <strong>the</strong> accounts <strong>and</strong>reports that companies are required to prepare; (2) The regulations may amend this Part byadding, altering or repealing provisions”.8As required by section 473 Companies Act 2006. Note that negative resolution procedureapplies to provisions made regarding summary financial statements <strong>under</strong> section 428Companies Act 2006.9“Where regulations or orders <strong>under</strong> this Act are subject to “affirmative resolution procedure”<strong>the</strong> regulations or order must not be made unless a draft of <strong>the</strong> statutory instrument containing<strong>the</strong>m has been laid before Parliament <strong>and</strong> approved by a resolution of each House ofParliament”.* * *10Discussed in Chapter 1.1.1, Annex 1.1.2.ii, <strong>and</strong> note 43.11s 417(6)(b) Companies Act 2006 requires companies to use KPIs in relation to environ-
160 | <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> <strong>transparency</strong> <strong>under</strong> <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 2006Notes | 161mental <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> matters ‘where appropriate’, to <strong>the</strong> extent necessary for an <strong>under</strong>st<strong>and</strong>ingof <strong>the</strong> development, performance or position of <strong>the</strong> company’s business.12At <strong>the</strong> time of his appointment, it was reflected in <strong>the</strong> accounting press that he “shouldprovide some topical experience in today’s political climate” (Dan Martin, ‘Seven heavyweightssign up for <strong>the</strong> FRRP’ AccountingWEB.co.uk (13 March 2007)).13FRRP website, ‘Panel Members’ (accessed Nov 2009) .14KPMG website, ‘What We Do: Market Sectors: Mining’ (accessed Nov 2009) .15OIAC website, ‘About Us’ (accessed Nov 2009) .16FRRP website, ‘FAQs’ (accessed Nov 2009) .17Financial Reporting Review Panel, ‘Review Findings <strong>and</strong> Recommendations 2008’ (2008),p. 4.18Ibid., p. 15.19Ibid., p. 16.20“(1) The Secretary of State may make provision by regulations about— (d) <strong>the</strong> obligations ofcompanies <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs as regards— (iii) <strong>the</strong> laying of accounts <strong>and</strong> reports before <strong>the</strong> companyin general meeting, (2) The regulations may amend this Part by adding, altering or repealingprovisions”.21s 473 Companies Act 2006.22“Where regulations or orders <strong>under</strong> this Act are subject to “affirmative resolution procedure”<strong>the</strong> regulations or order must not be made unless a draft of <strong>the</strong> statutory instrumentcontaining <strong>the</strong>m has been laid before Parliament <strong>and</strong> approved by a resolution of each Houseof Parliament”.23s 437 Companies Act 2006.24s 310 Companies Act 2006.25While <strong>the</strong>re is no statutory provision that shareholders must have <strong>the</strong> right to attend <strong>the</strong>AGM, in practice it is highly unlikely that any company would seek to disenfranchise <strong>the</strong>irshareholders or a class of <strong>the</strong>m in such a way. For fur<strong>the</strong>r discussion see Annex 6.3.1 <strong>and</strong>note 349.26s 324 Companies Act 2006. Proxies also have some rights in relation to resolutions atgeneral meetings. See Annex 6 for fur<strong>the</strong>r details.27This view is supported by a range of key stakeholders, including ethical institutionalinvestors (Interview Perry Rudd <strong>and</strong> Matt Crossman, Research Team, Rathbone Greenbank(Telephone, 15 October 2008)).28s 417(2) Companies Act 2006.29s 172 Companies Act 2006.30s 172 Companies Act 2006 requires that directors must have regard to considerations suchas ‘<strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> company’s operations on <strong>the</strong> community <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> environment’, <strong>and</strong>‘<strong>the</strong> desirability of <strong>the</strong> company maintaining a reputation for high st<strong>and</strong>ards of businessconduct’ when deciding how best to ‘promote <strong>the</strong> success of <strong>the</strong> company’.31s 333 Companies Act 2006; s 298 Companies Act 2006.32See Annex 6 for fur<strong>the</strong>r discussion.33D Zetzsche, ‘Virtual Shareholder Meetings <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Shareholder Rights Directive- Challenges <strong>and</strong> Opportunities’ CBC-RPS No. 0029 (26 June 2007).34Access could be vetted by <strong>the</strong> same body established to govern <strong>the</strong> access of persons whohave been negatively affected by company activities.35See section 430 Companies Act 2006.ChaptersChapter 136However, it is important to note that annual accounts <strong>and</strong> reports have long been recognizedas also being for <strong>the</strong> use of current or potential creditors (Company Law Review SteeringGroup, ‘Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: The Strategic Framework’(February 1999) p. 115), <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> ‘directors’ report’, prior to <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 2006,was viewed in <strong>the</strong> legislative reform process as containing requirements for ‘public interest’reporting (Company Law Review Steering Group, ‘Modern company law for a competitiveeconomy: Developing <strong>the</strong> Framework’ (March 2000) p. 158).37Directors’ must also prepare a directors’ remuneration report, <strong>under</strong> s 420 CompaniesAct 2006, to provide <strong>transparency</strong> as to <strong>the</strong> setting of directors’ pay. However, this is notdirectly relevant to this review <strong>and</strong> so will be omitted from discussion.38s 396 Companies Act 2006.39s 415 Companies Act 2006.40s 417(2) Companies Act 2006. Section 172 Companies Act 2006 provides that a director ofa company must act in <strong>the</strong> way he considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote<strong>the</strong> success of <strong>the</strong> company for <strong>the</strong> benefit of its members as a whole, <strong>and</strong> in doing so haveregard (amongst o<strong>the</strong>r matters) to — (a) <strong>the</strong> likely consequences of any decision in <strong>the</strong> longterm; (b) <strong>the</strong> interests of <strong>the</strong> company’s employees; (c) <strong>the</strong> need to foster <strong>the</strong> company’s businessrelationships with suppliers, customers <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs; (d) <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> company’soperations on <strong>the</strong> community <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> environment; (e) <strong>the</strong> desirability of <strong>the</strong> companymaintaining a reputation for high st<strong>and</strong>ards of business conduct; <strong>and</strong> (f) <strong>the</strong> need to actfairly as between members of <strong>the</strong> company.