publications_unodc_commentary-e

Opinion No.3 (2002): Principles and Rules governing Judges’ ProfessionalConduct, in particular Ethics, Incompatible Behaviour and Impartiality.Opinion No.2 (2001): Funding and Management of Courts with reference to theEfficiency of the Judiciary and to Article 6 of the European Convention onHuman Rights;Opinion No.1 (2001): Standards concerning the Independence of the Judiciaryand the Irremovability of Judges.Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China, Guide to Judicial Conduct,2004.IFES, Global Best Practices: Judicial Integrity Standards and ConsensusPrinciples, 2004.International Association of Judges, The Universal Charter of the Judge, 1999.International Centre for Ethics, Justice and Public Life, Toward the Development ofEthics Guidelines for International Courts, Report of a workshop held at theBrandeis Institute for International Judges, Salzburg, Austria, 2003.International Commission of Jurists, International Principles on the Independenceand Accountability of Judges, Lawyers and Prosecutors, Geneva, 2004.Judicial Ethics in South Africa, issued by the Chief Justice, President of theConstitutional Court, Judges Presidents of the High Courts and the Labour AppealCourt, and the President of the Land Claims Court, 2000.Madrid Principles on the Relationship between the Media and JudicialIndependence, 1994.Suva Statement of Principles on Judicial Independence and Access to Justice, 2004.Opinions of Judicial Ethics Advisory CommitteesAdvisory Opinions of:The United States Judicial ConferenceAlabama Judicial Inquiry CommissionAlaska Commission on Judicial ConductArizona Judicial Ethics Advisory CommitteeArkansas Judicial Ethics Advisory CommitteeColorado Judicial Ethics Board162