Prof. Dr Jan Pajak THE NEW ZEALAND EXPLOSION OF ... - Totalizm

H-99Chapter H.EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE AUTHOR's HYPOTHESIS THATTHE EXPLOSION OF AN EXTRATERRESTRIAL SPECECRAFT(UFO OF THE THIRD GENERATION - i.e. “TIME VEHICLE”)FORMED THE TAPANUI CRATERAny extensive exploitation of Magnocraft-like spacecraft (UFOs), whose OscillatoryChambers are heavily loaded with magnetic energy, should eventually lead to accidentaldamage of some of these vehicles and consequently, to their explosion. If we accept thepossibility of long term observation of our planet by members of an advancedextraterrestrial civilization who already have Magnocraft-type vehicles at their disposal,then, the natural consequence of this would be to expect that some of their spaceshipshave already exploded on Earth. As the sites where such UFOs have exploded must exhibita number of unique attributes (described in subsection F4) that are absent in natural landformations, it should be easy to check if any catastrophe of a magnetically propelled vehiclein fact took place on Earth. The author has already completed such a check and hasidentified two catastrophic formations, all attributes of which exactly correspond to those ofthe Magnocraft explosion sites. These formations are: the Tapanui Crater and theTunguska Blast Site.In subsection F4 a list of attributes unique to the Magnocraft's explosion sites isprovided. Below, each of these unique attributes will be matched to that manifested by theTapanui Crater. Therefore, while reading this section, it should be easier to follow the logicof deductions, if a simultaneous reference to the appropriate attributes listed in subsectionF4 is applied.The following items of evidence gathered so-far indicate that the Tapanui Craterexhibits all the unique attributes that should be present in Magnocraft explosion sites, andwhich could not be caused by a natural catastrophe:#1. The energy yield from the Tapanui explosion coincides with that expected for theexplosion of seven Magnocraft-type vehicles - see deductions presented in item #1 ofsubsection C2 and compare them with item #1 of subsection F4.#2. The devastation caused around the Tapanui Crater is distinctive of a powerfulexplosion (not an impact of a heavenly body). There are a number of facts alreadyaccumulated, all of which confirm the explosive origin of this Crater, and simultaneouslycontradict the possibility that the Tapanui Crater was formed as the result of a heavenlybody (e.g. a meteorite or a comet) impacting with Earth. The most important of these factshave already been discussed in subsection E2.#3. The Tapanui Crater was formed by a sequence of detonations, not by a singleexplosion. Appropriate evidence has already been discussed in item #4 of subsection C2.#4. The explosion in Tapanui had a cumulative character which is unknown in naturalexplosions and which can only be caused by technological devices. The inner configurationof the Tapanui Crater and the spread of soil blasted from it, both indicate the cumulativecharacter of the explosion. The Crater is deeper and its edges steeper at the south end,where the shockwaves entered the ground. Also the long-range post-explosion fallouts aremainly spread onto one side, i.e. towards the magnetic north (e.g. no long-range trinititefallouts were discovered at the south side of the Crater - see the map from Figure C7).#5. The devastation area in Tapanui has a shape characteristic for magneticexplosions - see Figure C6.