Prof. Dr Jan Pajak THE NEW ZEALAND EXPLOSION OF ... - Totalizm

A-7huge magnetic spring, the gradual unwinding of which, occurring in stages some time afterthe explosion, required the Earth's crust to move.There is a significant number of botanic, climatic, archaeological, and historicfindings already accumulated which perfectly fit the above hypothesis, and whichsimultaneously have no other interpretation. However, independent of all the factsestablished so-far, conclusive verification of the correctness of the author's hypothesis canalso be completed. This requires reviewing written historic records concerning the period ofabout 200 years following the Tapanui explosion. Amongst many others, such recordsshould contain the description of numerous "unpleasant" consequences resulting from apossible movement of the Earth's crust. The most distinct of these would be powerful"tsunami" waves that should sweep all coasts positioned towards the direction of the motion(e.g. the northern coasts of Europe & Africa and the southern coasts of New Zealand &Japan). Some records of floods caused by such tsunami could be present in historicchronicles. In fact there are indications of their existence. For example the book byHermann Flohn and Roberto Fantechin (Commission of the European Communities), "TheClimate of Europe: past, present and future" (D. Reidel Publishing Company, Holland,1984, ISBN 90-277-1745-1, page 38) contains the following statement, quote: "In Europe,the first signs of serious climatic disturbances came with a number of great wind-stormsand sea floods over the low-lying coasts, for instance around the North Sea, in thethirteenth century. The reported drowning of 100,000 to 400,000 people in some of theseincidents places them among the worst ever recorded weather disasters." (This quote refersto the diocese of Schleswig.) It is also worth noting that near Bluff in New Zealand the firstwhite settlers found decaying tree trunks whose orderly "inland" (and northward) directingcould indicate their destruction by such sea floods.If by any chance the correctness of this hypothesis is conclusively confirmed, theTapanui explosion would become the most important event in the recent history of ourplanet. Its implications would reach not only disciplines directly involved (e.g. history orgeography), but also to these seemingly non-connected such as politics, peace movement,nuclear experiments, and many more. This is because the Tapanui event revealed thevalue of the "critical explosive charge" which suffices to tilt the Earth's crust. This valueseems to be "only" about 70 megaton of TNT, i.e. the explosive power which can presentlybe released even in local nuclear conflict. Therefore, the Tapanui warns people about theconsequences of such a nuclear war.The evidence collected about the Tapanui explosion represents a number of totallydifferent classes of facts, such as legends, naming, historic records from eye witnesses,environmental changes, post-explosive material remains, global climatic changes. However,all this huge evidential material displays striking cause-effect coherence. Also, a significantproportion of it allows for independent dating, the results of which always point to the sameyear, 1178. Furthermore, there are multi-level similarities between the Tapanui explosionand the Tunguska blast. Together all this provides sufficient premise to conclude that in theyear 1178 there was a powerful explosion in New Zealand, very similar to that of Tunguskain 1908.When Leonid Aleksiejewicz KULIG, the investigator of the Tunguska blast site,presented in 1925 the material evidence which he accumulated about this powerful Siberianexplosion, his discoveries were received with scepticism and opposition. Over 60 yearslater exactly the same attitude was repeated in New Zealand for the Tapanui Crater. Thetreatise presenting evidence that in 1178 a huge spaceship exploded there was greeted asscientific heresy. The typical stand of New Zealand scholars regarding the author'sevidence identified so-far has been totally rejective and counter-arguing that: the TapanuiCrater is only a large landslip, all material evidence for a powerful explosion in this place isonly a series of chances, internal cause-effect coherence of subsequent evidence is alsocoincidental, the similarities in dates of origin of this material evidence must surely resultfrom imperfections of the present dating methodologies, historic records and climatic