Prof. Dr Jan Pajak THE NEW ZEALAND EXPLOSION OF ... - Totalizm

J-104explosion energy carrier would be the vehicle's fuel, i.e. most probably nuclear isotopes.Thus, such a rocket-type vehicle would produce a destruction pattern differing from thatformed by the Magnocraft, and also it would pollute the environment with radioactivity. Infact, almost all of the evidence presented in the next subsection certifies the correctness ofthe author's hypothesis, simultaneously contradicting the Russian claim that a rocket-typespacecraft exploded there.J1. Parallels between the Tapanui and the Tunguska ExplosionsThere exists astonishing similarities between the Tunguska Blast site and theTapanui Crater. These indicate that the causes of both explosions were the same.Presented below is some evidence originating from the Tunguska blast site which confirmsthe similarities between both explosions (the list of this evidence is combined in the order ofitems from subsection F4, i.e. in the same order in which the attributes of the Magnocraftexplosion sites were presented). While reviewing the descriptions that follow it could bebeneficial to simultaneously compare them with the corresponding items from chapter Hwhich relate to the Tapanui explosion.#1. The energy yields of the Tapanui Crater and the Tunguska Blast are very similar.The yield of the Tunguska Blast is estimated at about 30 megatons of TNT. In comparison,the atomic bomb exploded over Hiroshima had a yield of "only" about 12.5 kilotons (see thebook [5J1] by Dr. C. Phillips & Dr. I. Ross, "The Nuclear Casebook", ISBN 0-904919-83-8,page 10). It means that over Tunguska an equivalent of 2,400 bombs similar to theHiroshima one exploded. This total energy was released before the object hit the ground.No material object can produce such a vast amount of energy solely because of friction withthe atmosphere. But if a release of the energy contained in the Oscillatory Chambers of theMagnocraft-like spaceship is considered to be the cause for the Tunguska Blast, then onlythree of the K6 type vehicles, joined into a cigar-shaped flying complex, would produce a 30megaton explosion.#2. Both sites are devastated in a manner distinctive for an explosion, not for animpact of a heavenly object. Whenever a heavenly body has hit Earth, it has left a distinctcrater - see Figures C4 and C5. Experts claim that a blast caused by a black hole hittingEarth from space must leave a crater as well (apart from that the black hole would need tocause a similar explosion occurring on the other side of Earth - no such explosion wasregistered at that time in the Atlantic Ocean). But in the Tunguska Blast there was no craterleft at all. Moreover, in the exact centre of the explosion trees were still standing, afterlosing their foliage and branches, though for miles around all the trees had been blownaway. Trees left standing in the centre are also characteristic of a mid-air nuclear explosion.At Hiroshima, for example, trees directly under the blast still stood, while those at an angleto it were flattened. The above proves that the impact of the Tunguska explosion originatedfrom the explosive energy carried on board of the object, not from the kinetic energy of themotion and impact of this object.One of the most astonishing parallels between the Tunguska Site and the TapanuiCrater is the similarity in geometry in internal configuration of both these sites. Thissimilarity is illustrated in Figure C6. Notice that there is a number of geometric featureswhich are repeated in both sites.#3. In both explosions there is evidence documenting a sequence of detonations. InTunguska numerous witnesses reported hearing a sequence of 3 series of detonations (nota single "bang") resembling three packs of petards being fired. Each of these three serieswas composed of many individual bangs similar to those from a battery of artillery guns.Various eye-witnesses who served in artillery and were familiar with similar cannonadeestimated that the total number of explosions in all three series was about 50 to 60 ([1J],page 23). At this point it should be indicated that this kind of acoustic effects would be