Prof. Dr Jan Pajak THE NEW ZEALAND EXPLOSION OF ... - Totalizm

D-54rapidly released by this explosion and amounting to an equivalent of about 70 megaton ofTNT exerted a powerful magnetic impact on the Earth's magnetic field. An effect of thisimpact was that poles of the stationary magnetic field linked to the crust of our planet wereshifted to new locations, thus altering the "crustal polarity" of Earth. For example one ofthese magnetic poles was temporally shifted to the Tapanui Crater (even now localfishermen are talking about small areas of sea located not far from the Tapanui Craterwhere, probably because of magnetised underground deposits, magnetic compasses stillbehave as if they were placed on a magnetic pole of Earth). However, the dynamic "geogyroscopicpolarity" of Earth, which results from the Earth's rotation and from variouselectro-hydro-dynamic phenomena released by this rotation, remained unchanged. Thus,an effect of the Tapanui explosion was that our planet developed two separate and mutuallyopposing configurations of magnetic field, i.e. "crustal" and "geo-gyroscopic". The first ofthese was linked to the Earth's crust, the second one to the Earth's rotational axis and mass(thus practically to the Earth's mantle and core). Such rapid splitting of magnetic polaritydisturbed the equilibrium of our planet. Powerful forces appeared which tried to bringtogether and unify both configurations of the Earth's magnetic field, i.e. the newly dislocated"crustal" and the permanently existing "geo-gyroscopic". The action of these forces could becompared to that of a clock's huge spring attached to the Earth's crust being rapidly woundup by the Tapanui explosion. In the final effect these forces gradually moved the Earth'scrust and decreased the difference between both magnetic configurations. However, thealignment of both configurations was not rapid and could take many decades to becompleted. It also could appear periodically as in its release the Sun's magnetic field andthe gravity of neighbourly planets would perform a significant role. These, at certainpositions, would reinforce the completion of such alignment, whereas in other stages of theEarth's trajectory and rotation would oppose it. To summarize the above explanation, theTapanui explosion did not move the Earth directly, but only "wound" a magnetic "spring",the gradual "unwinding" of which some time afterwards subsequently rotated the planet'scrust in small "slips".The characteristic attributes of the Earth's movement resulting from the author'sabove explanation are as follows: (1) the crust's motion did not necessarily beginimmediately after the Tapanui explosion occurred, although it may have started within ayear after the explosion took place; (2) it was relatively slow and therefore all induced"unpleasant" side effects could not be much different from those caused by extremeweather conditions; (3) it could be completed gradually in a few stages spread throughout anumber of subsequent "slips", each stage appearing while neighbouring celestial bodiesformed a required configuration; (4) it did not change the astronomical position of Earth inrelation to the Sun and other planets but only slanted the Earth's crust in relation to therotational axis of our planet.If the above explanation is correct, then the explosive shifting of magnetic polesshould introduce various long lasting post-effects, some of which probably could be verifiedeven now. Three of these are described below. (1) The trajectory of Earth's magnetic polesshould resemble the behaviour of an "imbalanced spinning top". Because the Tapanuiexplosion exerted its magnetic impact mainly near the southern pole, its long-term effectscould be comparable to these of one end of a "spinning top" being thrown out of balance.(2) The difference between the geographic polarity and magnetic polarity of Earth shouldreach greater angular value at the South pole. This is because the southern location ofTapanui must cause the greater disturbance of the Earth's magnetic field to appear at thesouth geographic pole. (Currently a magnetic pole of Earth is distant only for about 13degrees from the north geographic pole, but as much as about 23 degrees from the southgeographic pole.) (3) A final alignment of both configurations of magnetic field should beincomplete. Theoretically speaking the friction that accompanied the crust's movementwould not allow the "crustal" configuration of Earth's magnetic field to align totally with the"geo-physical" configurations of this field. This means that even today there still should