12.07.2015 Views

Academy of Science South Africa 2005/6 Annual Report

Academy of Science South Africa 2005/6 Annual Report

Academy of Science South Africa 2005/6 Annual Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ASSAfMulti-year Strategic PlanASSAf’s annually awarded “<strong>Science</strong>-for-Society” Gold Medal has become a premier mark <strong>of</strong> peer andsystemic recognition <strong>of</strong> achievements that reflect the <strong>Academy</strong>’s values and mission.ASSAf is beginning to help NASAC play its desired continental role.ASSAf recently became a member <strong>of</strong> the influential “science council” sector in the NSTF.ASSAf’s weaknessesASSAf has failed to resolve the impasse <strong>of</strong> the country having two “old” quasi-academies continuingto co-exist with it in the <strong>South</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n science system, draining away “academy-type” energy in acountry that cannot in appropriate human resources terms support more than one effective nationalscience academy. This is compounded by an absence <strong>of</strong> consensus on how big (in terms <strong>of</strong> membershipnumbers) the <strong>Academy</strong> should be.The ASSAf membership is still largely passive in responding to invitations to participate in <strong>Academy</strong>affairs and activities that require personal commitment <strong>of</strong> time and effort. Stated generally,prioritisation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Academy</strong> meetings and activities by members, including Council members, iswell below that which is characteristic <strong>of</strong> well-established merit-based national science academies,including those <strong>of</strong> developing countries such as Brazil, India and Mexico. (Witness the attendancefigures for Council meetings and AGMs, and nomination and voting statistics in Membership andCouncil elections.)The system <strong>of</strong> self-categorisation by members <strong>of</strong> their disciplinary affiliations has not workedsmoothly, the categories are in dispute, and they are not linked to any functional mechanisms withinthe <strong>Academy</strong>.Support for ASSAf in the senior ranks <strong>of</strong> its “responsible” government department, the DST, is stillhighly variable. Invitations to important conferences and workshops are either not forthcoming orhave to be solicited post hoc from Departmental <strong>of</strong>ficials. As an example, the <strong>Academy</strong> was omittedfrom the planning group for the national “Knowledge Production” conference, despite having74 Promoting Excellence in <strong>Science</strong> for Society

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!