12.07.2015 Views

making-sense-of-change-management

making-sense-of-change-management

making-sense-of-change-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The underpinning theorythat shape people’s attitudes to and understanding <strong>of</strong> organizations, youcan take advantage <strong>of</strong> the possibilities <strong>of</strong> other ways <strong>of</strong> looking at things,and you can begin to understand how other people in your organizationmay view the world. You can also begin to see the limitations <strong>of</strong> eachmindset and the disadvantages <strong>of</strong> taking a one-dimensional approach toorganizational <strong>change</strong>.In the second section, we set out a range <strong>of</strong> useful models and ideasdeveloped by some <strong>of</strong> the most significant writers on organizational<strong>change</strong>. This section aims to illustrate the variety <strong>of</strong> ways in which youcan view the process <strong>of</strong> organizational <strong>change</strong>. We also make <strong>sense</strong> <strong>of</strong> thedifferent models and approaches by identifying the assumptions underpinningeach one. When you understand the assumptions behind amodel, you can start to see its benefits and limitations.In the third section, we come to some conclusions about organizational<strong>change</strong>, and stress the importance <strong>of</strong> being aware <strong>of</strong> underlying assumptionsand having the flexibility to employ a range <strong>of</strong> different approaches.HOW ORGANIZATIONS REALLY WORKWe all have our own assumptions about how organizations work, developedthrough a combination <strong>of</strong> experience and education. The use <strong>of</strong>metaphor is an important way in which we express these assumptions.Some people talk about organizations as if they were machines. Thismetaphor leads to talk <strong>of</strong> organizational structures, job design andprocess reengineering. Others describe organizations as political systems.They describe the organization as a seething web <strong>of</strong> political intriguewhere coalitions are formed and power rules supreme. They talk abouthidden agendas, opposing factions and political manoeuvring.Gareth Morgan’s (1986) work on organizational metaphors is a goodstarting point for understanding the different beliefs and assumptionsabout <strong>change</strong> that exist. He says:Metaphor gives us the opportunity to stretch our thinking and deepen ourunderstanding, thereby allowing us to see things in new ways and act in newways… Metaphor always creates distortions too… We have to accept thatany theory or perspective that we bring to the study <strong>of</strong> organization and<strong>management</strong>, while capable <strong>of</strong> creating valuable insights, is also incomplete,biased, and potentially misleading.98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!