01.12.2012 Views

Carbon Dioxide and Earth's Future Pursuing the ... - Magazooms

Carbon Dioxide and Earth's Future Pursuing the ... - Magazooms

Carbon Dioxide and Earth's Future Pursuing the ... - Magazooms

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

www.co2science.org<br />

P a g e | 34<br />

2.80 <strong>and</strong> 4.94. Clearly, <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong> state of <strong>the</strong> North Atlantic AMO is tremendously<br />

important to hurricane genesis <strong>and</strong> development; <strong>and</strong> this striking natural variability makes it<br />

impossible to determine if <strong>the</strong>re is any long-term trend in <strong>the</strong> TC data that might possibly be<br />

due to 20th-century global warming.<br />

One year later, Zeng et al. (2009), as <strong>the</strong>y describe it, “syn<strong>the</strong>sized field measurements, satellite<br />

image analyses, <strong>and</strong> empirical models to evaluate forest <strong>and</strong> carbon cycle impacts for historical<br />

tropical cyclones from 1851 to 2000 over <strong>the</strong> continental U.S.” In doing so, <strong>the</strong>y determined<br />

“<strong>the</strong>re were more forest impacts <strong>and</strong> greater biomass loss between 1851 <strong>and</strong> 1900 than during<br />

<strong>the</strong> 20th century.” On average, for example, <strong>the</strong>y found that “147 million trees were affected<br />

each year between 1851 <strong>and</strong> 1900,” which led to “a 79-Tg annual biomass loss.” Average<br />

annual forest impact <strong>and</strong> biomass loss between 1900 <strong>and</strong> 2000, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, “were 72<br />

million trees <strong>and</strong> 39 Tg, which were only half of <strong>the</strong> impacts before 1900,” which results <strong>the</strong>y<br />

say are in “accordance with historical records showing that Atlantic tropical cyclones were more<br />

active during <strong>the</strong> period from 1870 to 1900.” In addition, <strong>the</strong>y note that <strong>the</strong> amount of carbon<br />

released from <strong>the</strong> downed <strong>and</strong> damaged trees “reached a maximum value in 1896, after which<br />

it continuously decreased until 1978,” whereupon it leveled off for <strong>the</strong> remaining two decades<br />

of <strong>the</strong> 20th century.<br />

Taking a longer look at <strong>the</strong> subject, Chenoweth <strong>and</strong> Divine (2008) examined newspaper<br />

accounts, ships’ logbooks, meteorological journals <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r documents in order to reconstruct<br />

a history of tropical cyclones passing through <strong>the</strong> 61.5°W meridian between <strong>the</strong> coast of South<br />

America (~9.7°N) <strong>and</strong> 25.0°N over <strong>the</strong> period 1690-2007, which <strong>the</strong>y describe as “<strong>the</strong> longest<br />

<strong>and</strong> most complete record for any area of <strong>the</strong> world.” This work, however, was inconclusive for<br />

most of <strong>the</strong> time period, as <strong>the</strong> two researchers say <strong>the</strong>y could find “no evidence of statistically<br />

significant trend in <strong>the</strong> number of tropical cyclones passing through <strong>the</strong> region on any time<br />

scale.” But <strong>the</strong>y did note that “hurricane frequency is down about 20% in <strong>the</strong> 20th century<br />

compared to earlier centuries,” <strong>and</strong> that “this decline is consistent with <strong>the</strong> 20th century<br />

observed record of decreasing hurricane l<strong>and</strong>fall rates in <strong>the</strong> U.S. (L<strong>and</strong>sea et al., 1999; Elsner et<br />

al., 2004) <strong>and</strong> proxy reconstruction of higher tropical cyclone frequency in Puerto Rico before<br />

<strong>the</strong> 20th century (Nyberg et al., 2007), as well as model-simulated small changes in Atlantic<br />

basin tropical cyclone numbers in a doubled CO2 environment (Emanuel et al., 2008; Knutson et<br />

al., 2008).” They also report that “<strong>the</strong> period 1968-1977 was probably <strong>the</strong> most inactive period<br />

since <strong>the</strong> isl<strong>and</strong>s were settled in <strong>the</strong> 1620s <strong>and</strong> 1630s,” which finding “supports <strong>the</strong> results of<br />

Nyberg et al. (2007) of unprecedented low frequency of major hurricanes in <strong>the</strong> 1970s <strong>and</strong><br />

1980s.” In addition, it strongly suggests that <strong>the</strong> subsequent short-term increase in cyclone<br />

numbers has had absolutely nothing to do with <strong>the</strong> supposedly unprecedented concurrent<br />

warming of <strong>the</strong> globe, as it appears to be nothing more than a simple recovery from a shortterm<br />

dip (within a century-scale lull) that reduced yearly cyclone numbers to <strong>the</strong>ir lowest levels<br />

of <strong>the</strong> past three centuries.<br />

Going still fur<strong>the</strong>r back in time, Wallace <strong>and</strong> Anderson (2010) collected a total of 37 sediment<br />

cores along eight transects within Laguna Madre, an elongate water body located behind <strong>the</strong><br />

narrow low-elevation barrier that is Texas (USA’s) South Padre Isl<strong>and</strong>; <strong>and</strong> based on <strong>the</strong> vertical<br />

[ search engine powered by magazooms.com ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!