MIMO and Smart Antennas for Mobile Broadband ... - 4G Americas

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Antenna Type % CommentsRET 61 RET market share is increasingNon-RET 39Antenna Type % CommentsSingle band 50 40% of these are quad port such as AWS &PCS bandsMultiband 50 Multiband market share is increasingAntenna Type – Elevation Beamwidth 800/900 MHzBeam Width (Degrees) % Comment16 45 Nominal height is 1.4M10 20 Nominal height is 2.0M8 35 Nominal height is 2.6M4 0 N/AAntenna Type – Elevation Beam Width 1800/1900/2100 MHzBeamwidth (Degrees) % Comment16 10 Nominal height is 0.7M10 5 Nominal height is 1.0M8 65 Nominal height is 1.4M4 20 Nominal height is 2.0MAntenna Type – Azimuth Beam WidthAzimuth (Degrees) % Comment90 15 Typically Rural65 75 Urban/Suburban/Rural33 and 45 10 Six SectorThe distribution of tilt settings from an operator in a mixed urban/suburban market are shown below,where each of 138 sectors have both a low frequency antenna and a high frequency band antenna.The high frequency band antennas use less tilt; with a median of 3° while the low frequency antennasuse about twice the downward tilt (below the horizon). These sites had an average separation fromtheir nearest neighbor of 1.2km and an average height of 120 feet (average angle to the nearestneighbor’s base is 1.8°.)4G Americas MIMO and Smart Antennas for Mobile Systems – October 2012 – All Rights Reserved28
Note that this is likely a general rule, that when co-located, the lower frequency antennas are tilteddown more than the high frequency antennas because the lower frequency antenna has a largervertical beam width and lower propagation loss. To keep intercell interference to the same level, thelower frequency antennas are typically tilted down toward the ground more than the higher frequencyantennas.Figure 23 – Tilt distribution for an operator’s deployment in a mixed urban/suburban environment showing a median of 3degrees of downtilt for the high frequency band and 6 for the low frequency band. 20% have no tilt.4G Americas MIMO and Smart Antennas for Mobile Systems – October 2012 – All Rights Reserved29
Page 1 and 2: MIMO and Smart Antennasfor 3G and 4
Page 3 and 4: 5 Small Cells and HetNet Deployment
Page 5 and 6: 5) Smart antennas provide the next
Page 7 and 8: toward the ground where the mobile
Page 9 and 10: could then be tailored using mechan
Page 11 and 12: Figure 6 - Antenna technology curre
Page 13 and 14: 1.3 INTEGRATED RADIO/ANTENNAFigure
Page 15 and 16: Figure 10 - Link budget comparison
Page 17 and 18: 1.4 ACTIVE ANTENNA SYSTEM (AAS) TEC
Page 19 and 20: and combinations of carriers that c
Page 21 and 22: example, a rural base station with
Page 23 and 24: eamwidth is typically fixed if area
Page 25 and 26: for flat rural scenarios with large
Page 27: Figure 22, for unprocessed and fitt
Page 31 and 32: carrier frequency) limited uplink t
Page 33 and 34: These transmission modes are implem
Page 35 and 36: Code Book 1 Layer 2 Layers0 1√2 1
Page 37 and 38: codebook entry 2 will reduce interf
Page 39 and 40: Trans. ModeAntennaConfig. Figure De
Page 41 and 42: It is important to note that the ga
Page 43 and 44: 5 inputs forming the five beams sho
Page 45 and 46: Figure 32 - Downlink bit rate (left
Page 47 and 48: system simulation CDF for the anten
Page 49 and 50: Figure 36 - Calibration network blo
Page 51 and 52: smaller allocation. MU-MIMO transmi
Page 53 and 54: 1D Reconfigurable beam (RET)[tiltin
Page 55 and 56: 3.3 COMPARISON OF RET, 2D, AND 3D R
Page 57 and 58: 3.5 NETWORK OPTIMIZATION VERSUS LOA
Page 59 and 60: Figure 40 - Distribution of the ant
Page 61 and 62: • In this case, reconfigurable be
Page 63 and 64: Figure 43 - Typical cell site showi
Page 65 and 66: 4.2 CURRENT DEPLOYMENTSOne operator
Page 67 and 68: Figure 46 - Common monopole during
Page 69 and 70: Figure 48 - Mast with 11 operators
Page 71 and 72: Figure 50 - Antenna mount with Remo
Page 73 and 74: (a) (b) (c)Figure 52 - Small cell s
Page 75 and 76: 6 MISCELLANEOUS COMMERCIAL AND DEPL
Page 77 and 78: Figure 54AFigure 54BFigure 54 — H
Page 79 and 80:
The widely used 65º azimuth antenn
Page 81 and 82:
Figure 59 — Mathematical results
Page 83 and 84:
Recall that the new rules of thumb
Page 85 and 86:
300∑P60SPR(%) =60P∑300Undesired
Page 87 and 88:
--Co-Polarization--Cross-Polarizati
Page 89 and 90:
6.2.2 EFFECTS OF INCORRECT ANTENNA
Page 91 and 92:
any third order intermodulation pro
Page 93 and 94:
A RRH, also known as a Remote Radio
Page 95 and 96:
delays of each transmit path. These
Page 97 and 98:
equired at the antenna. In addition
Page 99 and 100:
Figure 72 - Photograph of the const
Page 101 and 102:
These cables, being a stranded cons
Page 103 and 104:
6.6.5 ADVANTAGES OF REMOTE FIBER FE
Page 105 and 106:
Figure 79 - Diplexer.Figure 80 - Tr
Page 107 and 108:
Figure 81 - Hybrid combiningcable l
Page 109 and 110:
ports. Integrated duplexers route t
Page 111 and 112:
Figure 90 - Antenna sharing usingTX
Page 113 and 114:
6.7.13 CONFIGURATIONSThe key elemen
Page 115 and 116:
6.8 INDOOR DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYST
Page 117 and 118:
een proven by experiment that a spa
Page 119 and 120:
2600 6 to 9 --Table 7 - Link budget
Page 121 and 122:
Figure 107 - Shannon upper limit ca
Page 123 and 124:
achieve MIMO performance on par wit
Page 125 and 126:
It is evident from the trial that M
Page 127 and 128:
Figure 112 - Example antennas from
Page 129 and 130:
1st Upper Sidelobe Level of the 1st
Page 131 and 132:
H/V TrackingDiscrimination between
Page 133 and 134:
Digital RF converterto LNAPAdigital
Page 135 and 136:
27 Section 7.1 of 3GPP Section 7.1
Page 137 and 138:
51 IST-4-027756 WINNER, D1.1.2 V1.1
show all

MIMO and Smart Antennas for Mobile Broadband ... - 4G Americas

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?