12.07.2015 Views

working life of women seventeenth century - School of Economics ...

working life of women seventeenth century - School of Economics ...

working life of women seventeenth century - School of Economics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

234 CRAFTS AND TRADES CRAFTS AND TRADESTower Hill where shee also keepes a victualling houseunlicensed." One licensed by the Earl <strong>of</strong> Middlesex.Amongst those duly licensed are the names <strong>of</strong> a fewwidows. In Cordwainer Street Ward, there wasonly one Tavern, " kept by a widdowe whose deceasedhusband was bound prentice to a Vintener and sokept his taverne by vertue <strong>of</strong> his freedome <strong>of</strong> thatcompanye after his termes <strong>of</strong> apprentizhood expired."'Conclusion.The foregoing examination <strong>of</strong> the relation <strong>of</strong> <strong>women</strong>to the different crafts and trades has shown themoccupying an assured ~osition wherever the system<strong>of</strong> family industry prevailed. While this lasted thedetachment <strong>of</strong> married <strong>women</strong> from business isnowhere assumed, but they are expected to assisttheir husband, and during his absence or after hisdeath to take his placeas head <strong>of</strong> the family and manager<strong>of</strong> the business.The economic position held by <strong>women</strong> dependedupon whether the business was carried on at home orelsewhere, and upon the possession <strong>of</strong> a small amount<strong>of</strong> capital. The wives <strong>of</strong> men who worked as journeymenon their masters' premises could not share theirhusbands' trade, and their choice <strong>of</strong> independentoccupations was very limited. The skilled <strong>women</strong>'strades, such as millinery and mantua-making, wereopen, and in these, though apprenticeship was usual,there is no reason to suppose that <strong>women</strong> who workedin them without having served an apprenticeship,were prosecuted; but as has been shown theapprenticeship laws were strictly enforced in otherdirections, and in some cases prevented <strong>women</strong> fromusing their domestic skill to earn their living.While <strong>women</strong> could share their husbands'trades they suffered little from these restrictions,but with the development <strong>of</strong> capitalistic organisationthe numbers <strong>of</strong> <strong>women</strong> who could find no outlet fortheir productive activity in partnership with theirhusbands were increasing and their opportunities forestablishing an independent industry did not keeppace ; on the contrary, such industry became evermore difficult. The immediate result is obscure, butit seems probable that the wife <strong>of</strong> the prosperouscapitalist tended to become idle, the wife <strong>of</strong> the skilledjourneyman lost her economic independence andbecame his unpaid domestic servant, while the wives<strong>of</strong> other wage earners were driven into the sweatedindustries <strong>of</strong> that period. What were the respectivenumbers in each class cannot be determined, but itis probable that throughout the <strong>seventeenth</strong> <strong>century</strong>they were still outnumbered by the <strong>women</strong> whocould find scope for productive activity in theirhusbands' business.l S.P.D. ccl., zz, November 6, 1633.Lord Mayor and others to the Council.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!