Table 4.<strong>Agri</strong>cultural alnd capability ratings for common field crops in <strong>Elgin</strong> <strong>County</strong> (continued)MapSymbolSoil or Misc.L<strong>and</strong> UnitB,bCCapability classification by slope classesc D d E e F,f G,gKE Kelvin 3W 3W 3W (5W)*KE.C Kelvin coarse phase 3W 3W 3W (5W)*KE.L Kelvin loamy phase 3W 3W 3W (5W)*KEN Kelvin washed phase 2W 2WE 2WT (4W)*KT Kintyre 2FM 2FM 2ST 2ST 3T 3T 4T 5T 6TMA Maplewood 2W 2WE 2WT (4W)*MA.T Maplewood till phase 2W 2WE 2WT (4W)*ME Melbourne 3D 3D 3DT 3DT 3DT 4T 4T 5T 6TMI Middlemarch 2F 2F 2FT 2FT 3TMK Muirkirk 2W 2W 2W (4W)*MU Muriel - 2D 2DE 2DT 3T 3T 4T 4T 5T 6TMU.L Muriel loamy phase 2D 2DE 2DT 3T 3T 4T 4T 5T 6TMU.W Muriel washed phase 1 2E 2T 3T 3T 4T 4T 5T 6TNM Not Mapped Not RatedNO Norm<strong>and</strong>ale 1 2E 2T 3T 3TOR Organic Not RatedPF Plainfield 3F 3F 3F 3F 3FT 3FT 4T 5T 6TSC Scarp (6T-7T)**SH Shedden 2FM 2FM 2ST 2ST 3T 3T 4T < 5T 6TSL Silver Hill 2W 2W 2WT (4W)*SO Southwold 4W 4W 4W (5W)*SP Springwater 3W 3W 3W(5W)*ST Strathburn 3WD 3WD 3WD (5W)*ST.C Strathburn coarse phase 3WD 3WD 3WD (5W)*ST.L Strathbum loamy phase 3WD 3WD 3WD (5W)*SW St . Williams 2W 2WE 2WT (4W)*TA Tavistock 1 2E 2T 3T 3TTA.T Tavistock till phase 1 2E 2T 3T 3TTO Toledo 3W 3W 3W (5W)*TO.C Toledo coarse phase 3W 3W 3W (5W)*TO.L Toledo loamy phase 3W 3W 3W (5W)*TU Tuscola 1 2E 2T 3T 3TTU.C Tuscola coarse phase 1 2E 2T 3T 3TVC Valley Complex (Valley walls : 6T-7T; flood plains: 3I-5I)**VI Vittoria 1 1 2T 2T 3TWA Walsher 2M 2M 2MT 2MT 3T 3T 4T 5T 6TWF Wattford 2M 2ME 2MT 3T 3T 4T 4T 5T 6TWM Walsingham 3F 3F 3F 3F 3FTWN Waterin 3W 3W 3W (4W-5W)*WU Wauseon 2W 2W 2WT (4W)*WU.T Wauseon till phase 2W 2W 2WT (4W)*` Appropriate capability ratings <strong>of</strong> poorly or very poorly drained soils without drainage improvements. <strong>The</strong>se ratings apply Wall slope classes.., <strong>The</strong> range <strong>of</strong> capability ratings which are appropriate for the miscellaneous l<strong>and</strong> unit.60
B .<strong>Agri</strong>cultural Suitability Classification for Special Crops<strong>The</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Inventory (CLI) soilcapability classification system for agriculture (17)is designed for common field crops includingforages, small grains <strong>and</strong> corn. It is not designed,however, to classify l<strong>and</strong> according to itssuitability for growing other field crops as well ashorticultural crops. Fruit <strong>and</strong> vegetable crops, <strong>and</strong>field crops such as soybeans or tobacco, are notincluded in the classification system . Crops whichfall into these categories <strong>and</strong> are dealt with furtherin this section will henceforth be referred to asspecial crops".Since a large portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>Elgin</strong> <strong>County</strong> is usedfor growing special crops, a suitability ratingsystem for a number <strong>of</strong> important agriculturalcrops was devised for the soils <strong>of</strong> the <strong>County</strong> . <strong>The</strong>ratings are based on information obtained fromfield observations, agricultural research <strong>and</strong>extension personnel, <strong>and</strong> from review <strong>of</strong> relevantliterature . <strong>The</strong> publications "Climate <strong>and</strong> soilrequirements for economically important crops in<strong>Canada</strong>" (25), <strong>and</strong> "A Compilation <strong>of</strong> Soil, Water<strong>and</strong> Climatic Requirements for SelectedHorticultural Crops in Southern Ontario" (26),were especially helpful .(1) Suitability Classification forSpecial Crops<strong>The</strong> classification system used to determinesoil suitability ratings is based on a systemdeveloped by the <strong>Food</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong><strong>Agri</strong>culture</strong>Organization (FAO) <strong>of</strong> the United Nations, whichis outlined in the FAO bulletin titled "AFramework For L<strong>and</strong> Evaluation" (27). Somemodifications <strong>of</strong> the FAO system, however, werenecessary to suit local conditions <strong>and</strong> the purposefor which the system was being applied . <strong>The</strong>resulting modified system consists <strong>of</strong> five classeswhich is the same number as in the FAO system.<strong>The</strong> most suitable soils, with no significantlimitations for crop growth <strong>and</strong> yields, aredesignated Class Sl . <strong>Soils</strong> designated Classes S2to S4 have decreasing suitability, <strong>and</strong> soilsdesignated Class N are not suitable.<strong>The</strong> suitability ratings <strong>of</strong> soils mapped in the<strong>County</strong> for a number <strong>of</strong> selected special crops aregiven in Tables 6, 7 <strong>and</strong> 8 . Each table providesratings for individual crops based on the response<strong>of</strong> the crop to various soil conditions, the surfacefeatures <strong>of</strong> the soil, <strong>and</strong> management practiceswhich may be carried out. Some crops weregrouped in the tables, however, if they weresimilar or had only subtle differences in regards tothese considerations . <strong>The</strong> crop groups identified ineach table, <strong>and</strong> the individual crops whichcompose them, are shown in Table 5.Table 5.Special crop groups in <strong>Elgin</strong> <strong>County</strong>CropgroupsVegetable crops(see Table 6)Special field crops(see Table 7)Fruit crops(see Table 8)1 Asparagus2 Sweet potatoes3 Irish potatoes4 Cucumbers5 Tomatoes6 Peppers7 Sweet corn8 Brussels sprouts,cauliflower,cabbageTobaccoPeanutsRutabagasSoybeansWhite beansSpring canolaWinter rapeseedRaspberries, strawberriesApples, walnutsPears, plums, heart nuts,filbert nuts