01.12.2012 Views

Symbiotic Fungi: Principles and Practice (Soil Biology)

Symbiotic Fungi: Principles and Practice (Soil Biology)

Symbiotic Fungi: Principles and Practice (Soil Biology)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 Use of the Autofluorescence Properties of AM <strong>Fungi</strong> 131<br />

arbuscules, formed during AM colonization as characteristic fungal structures in<br />

roots, are irradiated with blue light (Ames et al. 1982).<br />

Although the method of autofluorescence detection of AM fungal structures<br />

has been known for more than 25 years (Ames et al. 1982), it has not been widely<br />

used <strong>and</strong> its advantages for the assessment <strong>and</strong> management of AM fungi have not<br />

been fully explored.<br />

Ames et al. (1982), tested five different plant species colonized by different AM<br />

fungi, including species of the genera Glomus, Gigaspora <strong>and</strong> Acaulospora, <strong>and</strong><br />

observed that the arbuscules autofluoresced when illuminated with blue light<br />

<strong>and</strong> that the AM fungal species, host plant <strong>and</strong> growth conditions had no effect<br />

on the autofluorescence pattern. The study of Gange et al. (1999) confirmed that the<br />

autofluorescence of AM fungal structures was a common phenomenon, since it was<br />

observed in eight different plant species colonized by native AM fungi. Table 8.2<br />

shows the plant species studied until now by means of autofluorescence detection of<br />

AM fungal structures.<br />

There are several possible reasons why autofluorescence detection has not been<br />

more widely used as a method for visualizing AM fungal structures. One reason<br />

may be that the title of the article by Ames et al. (1982) was misleading, since the<br />

authors described the autofluorescence as being induced by ultraviolet light. If some<br />

Table 8.2 Plant species studied by autofluorescence detection for visualizing AM fungal<br />

structures<br />

Plant species a<br />

Material examined Reference<br />

Allium porrum Root sections Jabaji-Hare et al. (1984)<br />

Allium textile Whole-root segments Ames et al. (1982)<br />

Artemisia frigida Whole-root segments Ames et al. (1982)<br />

Bouteloua gracilis Whole-root segments Ames et al. (1982)<br />

Brachypodium pinnatum Whole-root segments Gange et al. (1999)<br />

Brahea armata Root sections Dreyer et al. (2006)<br />

Chamaerops humilis Root sections Dreyer et al. (2006)<br />

Dactylis glomerata Whole-root segments Gange et al. (1999)<br />

Fragaria vesca Whole-root segments Ames et al. (1982)<br />

Holcus lanatus Whole-root segments Gange et al. (1999)<br />

Hyacinthoides non-scripta Whole-root segments Gange et al. (1999)<br />

Lolium perenne Whole-root segments Vierheilig et al. (1999)<br />

Medicago sativa Whole-root segments Dreyer et al. (2006)<br />

Nicotiana tabacum Whole-root segments Vierheilig et al. (2001)<br />

Phoenix canariensis Root sections Dreyer et al. (2006)<br />

Phoenix dactylifera Root sections Dreyer et al. (2006)<br />

Plantago lanceolata Whole-root segments Gange et al. (1999)<br />

Scutellaria brittonii Whole-root segments Ames et al. (1982)<br />

Senecio vulgaris, Whole-root segments Gange et al. (1999)<br />

Senecio jacobaea Whole-root segments Gange et al. (1999)<br />

Veronica persica Whole-root segments Gange et al. (1999)<br />

a<br />

Gange et al. (1999) also examined the plant species Capsella bursa-pastoris <strong>and</strong> Poa annua, but<br />

as no arbuscules were seen, they were omitted from further analysis

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!