12.07.2015 Views

prospectus for - Pumpkin Patch investor relations

prospectus for - Pumpkin Patch investor relations

prospectus for - Pumpkin Patch investor relations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Auditors’ LetterThe Directors<strong>Pumpkin</strong> <strong>Patch</strong> LimitedPrivate Bag 94310, East TamakiPakuranga, AUCKLAND14 May 2004Auditors’ report <strong>for</strong> inclusion in the ProspectusDear DirectorsAs auditors of <strong>Pumpkin</strong> <strong>Patch</strong> Limited (“the Company”) we have prepared this report pursuant to clause 42 ofthe First Schedule of the Securities Regulations 1983 <strong>for</strong> inclusion in a Prospectus to be dated 14 May 2004.Directors’ responsibilitiesThe Company’s Directors are responsible <strong>for</strong> the preparation and presentation of:(a) the financial statements which give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of <strong>Pumpkin</strong> <strong>Patch</strong> Limitedand its subsidiaries (“the Group”) as at 31 January 2004 and 31 July 2003 and its financial per<strong>for</strong>manceand cash flows <strong>for</strong> the periods ended on that date, as required by clauses 23 to 38 of the First Scheduleof the Securities Regulations 1983;(b) the summary of financial statements of the Group <strong>for</strong> the years ended 31 December 1999, 2000, 2001 and2002, <strong>for</strong> the seven months ended 31 July 2003 and <strong>for</strong> the six months ended 31 January 2004, as requiredby clauses 8(2) and 8(3) of the First Schedule of the Securities Regulations 1983; and(c) the prospective financial in<strong>for</strong>mation of the Group <strong>for</strong> the years ending 31 July 2004 and 31 July 2005,including the assumptions on which they are based.Auditors’ responsibilitiesWe are responsible <strong>for</strong> expressing an independent opinion on the financial statements of the Group <strong>for</strong> the sixmonths ended 31 January 2004 and <strong>for</strong> the seven months ended 31 July 2003 presented by the Directors andreporting our opinion in accordance with clause 42(1) of the First Schedule of the Securities Regulations 1983.We are also responsible <strong>for</strong> reporting, in accordance with clauses 42(1)(g) and 42(2) of the First Schedule of theSecurities Regulations 1983,on the following matters which have been prepared and presented by the Directors:(a) the amounts included in the summary of financial statements of the Group <strong>for</strong> the years ended 31December 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002, <strong>for</strong> the seven months ended 31 July 2003 and <strong>for</strong> the six monthsended 31 January 2004; and(b) the prospective financial in<strong>for</strong>mation of the Group <strong>for</strong> the years ending 31 July 2004 and 31 July 2005.We have no <strong>relations</strong>hip with or interests in the Company or any of its subsidiaries other than in our capacitiesas auditors and accounting advisers.Basis of opinion on the financial statementsAn audit of the financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence relevant to the amounts anddisclosures in the financial statements. It also includes assessing:(a) the significant estimates and judgements made by the Directors in the preparation of the financialstatements; and(b) whether the accounting policies used and described on pages 49 to 52 are appropriate to thecircumstances of the Group and Company, consistently applied and adequately disclosed.We have conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in New Zealand. Weplanned and per<strong>for</strong>med our audit so as to obtain all the in<strong>for</strong>mation and explanations which we considerednecessary in order to provide us with sufficient evidence to give reasonable assurance that the financialstatements are free from material misstatements, whether caused by fraud or error. In <strong>for</strong>ming our opinion wealso evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation of the in<strong>for</strong>mation in the financial statements.70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!