12.07.2015 Views

Violence against children, the voices of Ugandan ... - Raising Voices

Violence against children, the voices of Ugandan ... - Raising Voices

Violence against children, the voices of Ugandan ... - Raising Voices

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Key Informant InterviewsKey informants included 84 <strong>children</strong> and 58 adults who participated inone-on-one interviews regarding <strong>the</strong>ir experiences <strong>of</strong> and perspectives onviolence <strong>against</strong> <strong>children</strong>. These individuals were identified based on <strong>the</strong>irunique backgrounds or positions in <strong>the</strong> community and <strong>the</strong>ir willingnessto share <strong>the</strong>ir experiences (e.g., child with a disability, imprisoned child,religious leader, headmaster, police <strong>of</strong>ficer, social welfare <strong>of</strong>ficer, etc.).Journal WritingThe research team asked 25 <strong>children</strong> to record, over a 10-day period, <strong>the</strong>ir thoughts, experiences, andstrategies for combating violence <strong>against</strong> <strong>children</strong>. These 25 <strong>children</strong> were identified based on <strong>the</strong>ir ability towrite and <strong>the</strong> willingness to attend a briefing and debriefing meeting.Table 1.2 Adults consulted through each method <strong>of</strong> datacollectionWomenGroup Questionnaires FGD Interview TotalTeachers 191 40 11 242Parents 129 50 10 189Community Leaders 31 50 8 89Subtotal 351 140 29 520MenTeachers 196 30 9 235Formative Research andTool DevelopmentAdditional adults and <strong>children</strong> formed fouradvisory groups. Two groups consistedexclusively <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> (20 girls in onegroup and 20 boys in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r), and twogroups consisted exclusively <strong>of</strong> adults(10 women in one group and 10 men in<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r). These groups commentedon <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study, influenced<strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study, and guided <strong>the</strong>wording in <strong>the</strong> research tools.Parents 154 60 12 226Community Leaders 54 50 8 112 Each advisory group met three times.In <strong>the</strong> first meeting, group membersSubtotal 404 140 29 573engaged in a broad ranging discussionTotal 1093 exploring <strong>the</strong>ir conception <strong>of</strong> violence<strong>against</strong> <strong>children</strong>, why it occurs, and whatshould be done to prevent it. Key <strong>the</strong>meswere identified and carried through to <strong>the</strong> subsequent meetings. In <strong>the</strong> second meeting, group membersdiscussed specific concepts (e.g., how adults understand <strong>the</strong> word “violence”) and <strong>the</strong> questions that wouldbe used to elicit information from <strong>the</strong> subjects. In <strong>the</strong> third and final meeting, participants examined <strong>the</strong>research tools that would support data collection and provided <strong>the</strong>ir final comments. Fifty questionnaires wereadministered to adults and fifty to <strong>children</strong> as a pre-test <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tools developed through this process and finaladjustments were made.6Part One Research Design

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!