12.07.2015 Views

Assurance de qualité pour le cancer rectal – phase 2 ...

Assurance de qualité pour le cancer rectal – phase 2 ...

Assurance de qualité pour le cancer rectal – phase 2 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

120 PROCARE <strong>–</strong> <strong>phase</strong> 2 KCE reports 81All patientsN = 7074Figure 32. Algorithm for QI 1217 (administrative database).Did patient receivechemotherapy ORradiotherapy ORsurgery ?TrueN = 6337Median time betweeninitial diagnosis andfirst treatment ?MissingN = 78QI = 14 daysFalseN = 659PROPORTION OF CSTAGE II-III PATIENTS THAT RECEIVED ASHORT COURSE OF NEOADJUVANT PELVIC RTMeasurement in prospective PROCARE database (Figure 33)Stage II and III RC patients are se<strong>le</strong>cted using the variab<strong>le</strong>s ‘SPR_V147’ and ‘PT_V106’for the cStage. In this group of patients, those receiving surgery are se<strong>le</strong>cted usingvariab<strong>le</strong> ‘AD_V111’. Within this group of patients, patients receiving preoperativeradiotherapy are se<strong>le</strong>cted using variab<strong>le</strong> ‘RD_V101’. Patients receiving a short course ofradiotherapy (i.e. 5 fractions of 5 Gy) are se<strong>le</strong>cted using variab<strong>le</strong>s ‘RD_V106’ (numberof fractions) and ‘RD_V109’ (total dose).Measurement in coup<strong>le</strong>d administrative databaseIn the nomenclature, several co<strong>de</strong>s are availab<strong>le</strong> for radiotherapy (Tab<strong>le</strong> 70). However,it is impossib<strong>le</strong> to i<strong>de</strong>ntify the exact number of fractions and radiation dose with theseco<strong>de</strong>s (e.g. both 25 x 1.8 Gy and 13 x 3 Gy can be bil<strong>le</strong>d with nomenclature co<strong>de</strong>444150 <strong>–</strong> 444161). Some hospitals bill the entire radiotherapy regimen once (i.e. on thepatient <strong>le</strong>vel, the nomenclature co<strong>de</strong> was found only once in the HIC database), otherhospitals bill every fraction separately (i.e. on the patient <strong>le</strong>vel, the nomenclature co<strong>de</strong>was found several times in the HIC database) (Tab<strong>le</strong> 81). Above this, the exact radiationdose cannot be retrieved from nomenclature co<strong>de</strong>s. Therefore, the i<strong>de</strong>ntification of ashort course of RT through nomenclature co<strong>de</strong>s is impossib<strong>le</strong>.In ICD-9-CM, two co<strong>de</strong>s were i<strong>de</strong>ntified for radiotherapy, again without specification ofdose and fractions (Tab<strong>le</strong> 71).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!