18Wojciech Szczęsny et al.hernias. Hernia belts were in use in Rome; in case ofincarceration the spermatic cord <strong>and</strong> testis were removedvia an incision in the scrotum <strong>and</strong> the woundleft to heal by granulation. Incarceration was not theonly indication for surgery in ancient times - herniotomywas also performed for persistent pain. Paul ofAegina operated scrotal hernias by ligating both thehernial sac <strong>and</strong> the spermatic cord – sacrificing thetestis. Celsus attempted to spare the testis while operating[2].During the Middle Ages there has been little advancein hernia surgery, even though some of the mostrenowned physicians of that era took an interest in thatarea. William of Saliceto followed the path Celsus hadtaken thirteen centuries before him, striving to sparethe testis while performing surgery for inguinal hernia.Guy de Chauliac was able to discern between femoral<strong>and</strong> inguinal hernias <strong>and</strong> used the Trendelenburg positionduring hernia reduction.The wonderful advancement of science during theRenaissance era concerned medicine as well. AntonioBenivieni (1440-1502), one of the founding fathers ofpathology, wrote extensively about various hernias inhis “De abditis morborum causis („On the hiddencauses of diseases”). The greatest Renaissance surgeon,Ambrose Pare, gave a detailed description ofhernia repair techniques, including drawings. In hispractice he used golden wire as a suturing material. Histechnique included ligation of the hernial sac, its reductioninto the peritoneal cavity <strong>and</strong> closure of the parietalperitoneum in certain cases. Pare warned againsttraveling herniotomists <strong>and</strong> barbers, who almost universallycastrated their patients during hernioplasty.This practice was far from marginal, as shown by theexample of Jacques Beaulieu, a XVII th century travelinglithotomist, who performed over 2000 herniotomies<strong>and</strong> approximately 4500 cystolithotomies [2, 3]. In1556 Pierre Franco, a Swiss surgeon, introduced adissector of his own invention to exp<strong>and</strong> the inguinalring in incarcerated hernia. He recommended a reductionof the sac contents <strong>and</strong> closure with linen sutures[2].Autopsies, performed since the Renaissance, haveled to a vast improvement in the knowledge of humananatomy. In 1559 Kaspar Stromayr first distinguishedbetween direct <strong>and</strong> indirect hernia. Advances in otherareas of science have led to an accumulation of knowledgeon human anatomy, physiology <strong>and</strong> pathology.During the following decades, both theoretical research<strong>and</strong> attempts at new operative techniques continued. In1721 Chesleden successfully operated an incarceratedscrotal hernia, while Percival Pott published a report onthe pathogenesis of incarceration in 1757 [2,4].The XVIII th century was a period of intense investigationsof inguinal anatomy. Many names of theresearchers of that era, such as Cooper, Skarpa, Gimbernathave entered the language of anatomy forever.Gimbernat advised dissection of the inguinal ring laterallyrather than cephalad in cases of strangulated hernia,which led to life-threatening hemorrhages <strong>and</strong>damage to the inguinal ligament. Despite the significantadvances in theoretical knowledge, the outcomesof surgical treatment did not improve markedly, partiallydue to the lack of the rules of aseptic <strong>and</strong> antisepticsurgery. The introduction of the latter coincidedwith the advent of a new era of herniology heralded byBassini. Earlier, in 1871, Marcy, who was a student ofLister, performed the first antiseptic hernioplasty. In1874 Steele reported a „radical hernia operation”which consisted of hernia reduction <strong>and</strong> closure of thesuperficial inguinal ring. Lucas-Championniere wasthe first to open the inguinal canal in 1881 (through anincision in the external oblique aponeurosis) <strong>and</strong> excisethe hernial sac to the level of the deep inguinal ring.Five years later, Mac Ewen folded the peritoneum ofthe sac <strong>and</strong> placed it as a „plug” inside the deep inguinalring, which was additionally reinforced by sutures[2, 5, 6].Despite the use of general anesthesia, aseptic <strong>and</strong>high sac ligation, the outcomes of inguinal hernia surgeryin the latter half of the XIX th surgery were unfavorableboth in Europe <strong>and</strong> the USA. Mortality ratesdue to sepsis, hemorrhage <strong>and</strong> other causes reached 2-7% of the cases <strong>and</strong> the recurrence rate was practically100% after 4 years. As Billroth stated in 1890, mostsurgeons at that time left the wound to heal by secondaryintention after sac ligation, believing that theresulting scar would reinforce the abdominal wall,preventing recurrence. By the end of the XIX th centuryroutine resection <strong>and</strong> primary anastomosis were introducedin cases of gut necrosis due to strangulation [7].BREAKTHROUGHPrior to his famous operation, Eduardo Bassiniused numerous techniques to treat inguinal hernias.Through analyzing his failures, he came to underst<strong>and</strong>the principle of correct inguinal hernia repair: insteadof closing the deep inguinal ring, one should strive torecreate physiological anatomical relationships be-
The history <strong>and</strong> the present of herniology 19tween the elements of the inguinal canal <strong>and</strong> to reinforceits posterior wall. His original technique (whichhas, over time, spawned numerous modifications) was,similarly to the later introduced Shouldice repair,based on a longitudinal incision of the transverse fasciaranging from the pubic tubercle to approximately 2.5cm above the deep ring. Thus, he gained wide access tothe preperitoneal space, which allowed for high ligationof the hernial sac. The medial non-absorbable silksutures ran through the rectus sheath. Bassini was thefirst to closely follow up his patients. In 1887, threeyears after his initial operation, he presented the outcomesof his treatment at the congress of Italian surgeonsin Genoa. A beautifully illustrated monograph,published in 1889 <strong>and</strong> translated into German in 1890,spawned a tremendous interest in the new method.Soon, Bassini’s position as the founding father of modernherniology was unchallengeable [8].At roughly the same time, William Halsted presentedhis method of inguinal hernia repair. The maindifference from Bassini’s technique was the placementof the spermatic cord (often with the cremaster muscle<strong>and</strong> pampiniform plexus resected) above the closedexternal oblique anastomosis. Both these great surgeonshave set the fourth principle of successful inguinalhernia repair. They have added reinforcement ofthe posterior wall of the inguinal canal to the threeprinciples already known: aseptic/antiseptic surgery,high sac ligation <strong>and</strong> reduced diameter of the deepinguinal ring. they have also stressed the importance ofthe transverse fascia [8, 9 ].The basic drawback to Bassini’s repair was the tensionarising along the suture line, causing pain <strong>and</strong>recurrence. To reduce the tension, in 1892 Wolferperformed an incision of the anterior layer of the rectussheath. Berger made a similar incision, but he fastenedthe lateral flap of the incised rectus sheath to Poupart’sligament. The idea was approved by Halsted, whodiscarded his previous principle of spermatic cordthinning, developing a new type of hernia repair (theHalsted II technique). This type of inguinal herniarepair was further studied <strong>and</strong> developed by McVay<strong>and</strong> Anson, who have confirmed its usefulness on alarge group of patients [10 ].The use of foreign materials was the next logicalstage in inguinal hernia repair. This solution was pioneeredby Marcy, who implanted kangaroo tendons tocover a tissue defect as early as 1887. He also experimentedwith fasciae of other animals. In 1901McArthur initiated the era of fascial repair, using avascularized flap of the external oblique aponeurosis.This concept was revisited 80 years later in India byMohan Desarda [11, 12, 13 ]. The external obliqueaponeurosis was soon considered insufficient, whichled to the use of the fascia lata as a free or pedicle flap.This method was popularized in Engl<strong>and</strong> by GeoffreyKeynes, who used it in femoral hernias as well (suturingthe flap to Cooper’s ligament). In later years, reportson various <strong>biological</strong> materials had been publishedup to 1975, when Sames proposed the use of thevas deferens as suturing material [2, 3].The use of human skin for inguinal hernia repairforms a separate chapter. This material, being autogenous,has been considered infection-resistant. Loewewas one of the pioneers of its use, implanting humanskin in seven patients, including one with a postoperativehernia, in 1913 [14]. The procedure was popularizedby Rehn, who prepared the skin by scraping offthe epidermis to prevent fistula <strong>and</strong> cyst formation. InPol<strong>and</strong> human skin was introduced to herniology byJankowski [15 ]. One of the ways to prepare the skinflap was exposure to high temperature <strong>and</strong> epidermisremoval, described by Hoffman in 1970 [16 ]. Thismethod was in use in our Clinic, but long-term outcomeshave proven far from perfect. The introductionof synthetic materials has practically eliminated humanskin as prosthetic material [ 17 ].The ancient concept of metal as an implant wasalso revisited. The materials used included silver -„silver mesh filigree”(Witzel <strong>and</strong> Goepel), tantalum(Burke) , steel (Babcock) <strong>and</strong> gold. The initial enthusiasmwaned when complications in the form of cysts,tissue damage <strong>and</strong> high recurrence rates became apparent.These materials remained in use until the early1960’s [2].By the end of the XIX th century, the luminaries inthe field of surgery gained certainty that the road tosuccessful hernia repair led through the use of syntheticmaterials. In a 1878 letter Billroth wrote toCzerny: „If we learn to manufacture artificial tissueswith the properties of fasciae <strong>and</strong> tendons, we willsolve the problem of radical hernia repair” [4].In 1935 nylon was synthesized. Its biocompatibilitywas soon appreciated <strong>and</strong> it was introduced to surgery,including herniology. Melick developed the„nylon darn” technique, which remains in use today.Based on the considerations on nylon, the problemof the ideal hernia prosthesis arose. The desired materialshould meet the criteria set by Schumpelick [18 ]:– properties must not be altered by exposure to bodily
- Page 8: 8Wojciech J. Baranowskirating) move
- Page 13 and 14: The benefits resulting from introdu
- Page 15 and 16: The benefits resulting from introdu
- Page 17: Medical and Biological Sciences, 20
- Page 21 and 22: The history and the present of hern
- Page 23: The history and the present of hern
- Page 26: 26Anna Budzyńska et al.Gram-dodatn
- Page 32 and 33: 32Piotr Kamiński et al.Streszczeni
- Page 34 and 35: 34Piotr Kamiński et al.both in Pom
- Page 36 and 37: 36Piotr Kamiński et al.hemoglobin
- Page 39 and 40: Medical and Biological Sciences, 20
- Page 41 and 42: Impact of mandatory vaccination pro
- Page 43 and 44: Medical and Biological Sciences, 20
- Page 45 and 46: Bone turnover during pregnancy 45ra
- Page 47: Bone turnover during pregnancy 47pl
- Page 50 and 51: 50Jan Styczyński, Anna Jaworska(p
- Page 52 and 53: 52Jan Styczyński, Anna JaworskaRES
- Page 55 and 56: Medical and Biological Sciences, 20
- Page 57 and 58: Analysis of immunophenotype at seco
- Page 59: Analysis of immunophenotype at seco
- Page 62 and 63: 62Ana-Maria ŠimundićINTRODUCTIOND
- Page 64 and 65: 64Ana-Maria ŠimundićThe shape of
- Page 67 and 68: Medical and Biological Sciences, 20
- Page 69 and 70:
Quantitative anatomy of the aortic
- Page 71 and 72:
Quantitative anatomy of the aortic
- Page 73 and 74:
Medical and Biological Sciences, 20
- Page 75 and 76:
Volumetric growth of various aortic
- Page 77 and 78:
Volumetric growth of various aortic
- Page 79 and 80:
Medical and Biological Sciences, 20
- Page 81 and 82:
Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy a
- Page 83 and 84:
Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy a
- Page 85 and 86:
Medical and Biological Sciences, 20
- Page 87 and 88:
Body weight support during treadmil
- Page 89 and 90:
Body weight support during treadmil
- Page 91 and 92:
Medical and Biological Sciences, 20