- Page 1 and 2: D e c e n t r a l i z e dEvaluation
- Page 3 and 4: The Water Environment Research Foun
- Page 5 and 6: ABSTRACT AND BENEFITSAbstract:This
- Page 7 and 8: 3.1.2 Flux Chamber Inserts for Sept
- Page 9 and 10: LIST OF TABLESES-1 Summary of Metha
- Page 11: 3-7 Use of Flux Chamber in the Soil
- Page 15 and 16: tank is converted anaerobically. Fu
- Page 17 and 18: RecommendationsBased on the finding
- Page 19 and 20: ♦♦Collection of gas samples fro
- Page 21 and 22: include Imhoff tanks, anaerobic baf
- Page 23 and 24: 2.2 Septic Tank CharacteristicsSept
- Page 25 and 26: 2.2.3 General Conversion Processes
- Page 27 and 28: increase in thickness with daily so
- Page 29 and 30: environmental damage and/or health
- Page 31 and 32: Figure 2-6. The Intermediate Steps
- Page 33 and 34: In anaerobic reactors, the alkalini
- Page 35 and 36: epresentative concentrations. Inhib
- Page 37 and 38: 2.4 Gas Emissions from Septic Syste
- Page 39 and 40: Figure 2-9. Flux Chamber Designed b
- Page 41 and 42: due to settling and anaerobic diges
- Page 43 and 44: total methane production value of 1
- Page 45 and 46: 2-26
- Page 47 and 48: The main body of the flux chamber w
- Page 49 and 50: 3.1.3 Flux Chamber Design for Use i
- Page 51 and 52: 3.2 Sampling ProtocolsThe three pri
- Page 53 and 54: 3.2.3 Sampling Method for Vent Syst
- Page 55 and 56: 3.3 Gas AnalysisThe gas samples wer
- Page 57 and 58: ppm (raw data from laboratory) were
- Page 59 and 60: gal. Sites 5, 6, and 7 were the onl
- Page 61 and 62: Table 4-2. Continued from previous
- Page 63 and 64:
Three of the septic tanks that appe
- Page 65 and 66:
steeper than that for the rest of t
- Page 67 and 68:
espectively, and for methane were 4
- Page 69 and 70:
oth before and after the septic tan
- Page 71 and 72:
noted that in this approach it is a
- Page 73 and 74:
The septic tank effluent CO 2 equiv
- Page 75 and 76:
(a)(b)Figure 5-9. Gas Emission Rate
- Page 77 and 78:
Figure 5-11. Emission Rates from Si
- Page 79 and 80:
(a)(b)Figure 5-13. Views of the Eff
- Page 81 and 82:
It is important to note that the U.
- Page 83 and 84:
♦ Methane generated during the an
- Page 85 and 86:
A-2
- Page 87 and 88:
B. Based on COD Loading1. Determine
- Page 89 and 90:
C-2
- Page 91 and 92:
2. First row of Table 23 from Sasse
- Page 93 and 94:
Biogas production = (COD inflow - C
- Page 95 and 96:
E-2
- Page 97 and 98:
SAMPLING FROM SOIL SURFACEDate:Hour
- Page 99 and 100:
F-4
- Page 101 and 102:
G-2
- Page 103 and 104:
DateSamplelocationGas measurement (
- Page 105 and 106:
After the initial inspections, Site
- Page 107 and 108:
H-2 Site 2The scum layer in the fir
- Page 109 and 110:
Table H-10. GHG Emission Rates From
- Page 111 and 112:
Table H-14. Summary of the Water Qu
- Page 113 and 114:
Table H-18. Summary of the Water Qu
- Page 115 and 116:
Table H-22. GHG Emission Rates from
- Page 117 and 118:
Sample Gas measurement (g/capita·d
- Page 119 and 120:
H-9 Summary of ResultsA summary of
- Page 121 and 122:
I-2
- Page 123 and 124:
Treatment in Decentralized Wastewat
- Page 125 and 126:
Philip, H., S. Maunoir, A. Rambaud,
- Page 127 and 128:
Winfrey, M.R. and J.G. Zeikus (1977
- Page 129 and 130:
Fort Worth, City ofHouston, City of
- Page 132:
W E R F P r o d u c t O r d e r F o