32ReferencesAdams, J. R., & Drake, R. E. (2006). <strong>Shared</strong> decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g and evidence-basedpractice. Community <strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Journal, 42, 87-105.Annapolis Coalition on the Behavioral <strong>Health</strong> Workforce (2007). An Action Planfor Behavioral <strong>Health</strong> Workforce Development: A framework for discussion.[Accessed at www.annapoliscoalition.org/national_strategic_plann<strong>in</strong>g.phpJune 8, 2008].Benbassat, J., Pilpel, D., & Tidhar, M. (1998). Patients’ preferences for participation<strong>in</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g: A review of published surveys. BehavioralMedic<strong>in</strong>e, 24(2): 8-88.Bunn, M. H., O’Connor, A. M., Tansey, M. S., Jones, B. D., & St<strong>in</strong>son, L. E. (1997).Characteristics of clients with schizophrenia who express certa<strong>in</strong>ty or uncerta<strong>in</strong>tyabout cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g treatment with depot neuroleptic medication.Archives of Psychiatric Nurs<strong>in</strong>g, 11(5): 238-248.Charles, C., & Demaio, S. (1993). Lay participation <strong>in</strong> health-care decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g—aconceptual framework. Journal of <strong>Health</strong> Politics, Policy and Law,18(4): 881-904.Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997). <strong>Shared</strong> decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the medicalencounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango?). SocialScience and Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 44(5): 681-192.Deegan, P. E. (2007). The lived experience of us<strong>in</strong>g psychiatric medication <strong>in</strong> therecovery process and a shared decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g program to support it.Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31(1): 62-69.Dudz<strong>in</strong>ski, D. M., & Sullivan, M. (2004). When agree<strong>in</strong>g with the patient is notenough: A schizophrenic woman requests pregnancy term<strong>in</strong>ation. GeneralHospital Psychiatry, 26: 475-480.Edwards, A., Elwyn, G., Hood, K., Atwell, C., Robl<strong>in</strong>g, M., Houston, H., et al.(2004). Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized trial ofshared decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g skill development and use of risk communicationaids <strong>in</strong> general practice. Family Practice, 21(4): 347-354.<strong>Shared</strong> <strong>Decision</strong>-<strong>Mak<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong>:Practice, Research, and Future Directions
33Fellowes, D., Wilk<strong>in</strong>son, S., & Moore, P. (2003). Communication skills tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g forhealth care professionals work<strong>in</strong>g with cancer patients, their families and/or carers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, issue 4, art. no.CD003751.Ford, S., Schofield, T., & Hope, T. (2002). Barriers to the evidence-based patientchoice (EBPC) consultation. Patient Education Counsel<strong>in</strong>g, 47(2): 179-185.Hamann, J., Cohen, R., Leucht, S., Busch, R., & Kissl<strong>in</strong>g, W. (2005). Do patientswith schizophrenia wish to be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> decisions about their medicaltreatment? American Journal of Psychiatry, 162: 2382-2384.Hamann, J., Langer, B., W<strong>in</strong>kler, V., Busch, R., Cohen, R., Leucht, S., et al. (2006).<strong>Shared</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>-patients with schizophrenia. Acta PsychiatricaScand<strong>in</strong>avica, 114: 265-273.Hammond, K., Bandak, A., & Williams, M. (1999). Nurse, physician, and consumerrole responsibility perceived by health care providers. Holistic Nurs<strong>in</strong>gPractices, 12(2): 28-37.Institute of Medic<strong>in</strong>e. (2006). Improv<strong>in</strong>g the quality of health care for mental andsubstance-use conditions: Quality chasm series. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC: NationalAcademies Press.Jansen, S. T., Kievit, J., Nooij, M. A. & Stiggelbout, A. M. (2001). Stability of patients’preferences for chemotherapy: The impact of experience. Medical<strong>Decision</strong> <strong>Mak<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, 21(4): 295-306.Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision underrisk. Econometrica, 47(2): 263-292.Lev<strong>in</strong>son, W., Kao, A., & Kuby, A. (2005). Not all patients want to participate <strong>in</strong>decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g: A national survey of public preferences. Journal of GeneralInternal Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 20: 531-35.Lew<strong>in</strong>, S. A., Skea, Z. C., Entwistle, V., Zwarenste<strong>in</strong>, M., & Dick, J. (2001). Interventionsfor providers to promote a patient-centered approach <strong>in</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>icalconsultations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. CD003267 DOI:10.1002/14651858. CD003267.Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory—An alternative theory of rationalchoice under uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty. Economics Journal, 92(368): 805-824.<strong>Shared</strong> <strong>Decision</strong>-<strong>Mak<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong>:Practice, Research, and Future Directions
- Page 4: iiContentsIntroduction ............
- Page 11 and 12: 5outpatient commitment (Holmes-Rovn
- Page 13 and 14: 7Advantages• Practitioners can be
- Page 15: 9Section 2The Practice of SharedDec
- Page 22 and 23: 16Section 3SDM ResearchCurrent rese
- Page 24: 18Mental health care providers are
- Page 27 and 28: 21want mental health treatment or d
- Page 29: 23Some participants raised concerns
- Page 37: 31Section 6ConclusionsShared decisi
- Page 41 and 42: 35Power, A. Kathryn. (July 10, 2007
- Page 43 and 44: 37Appendix AResourcesThis list is p
- Page 45 and 46: 39Appendix BShared Decision-MakingM
- Page 47 and 48: 41Annelle Primm, M.D., M.P.H.Direct
- Page 49 and 50: 43Supplement 1Shared Decision-Makin
- Page 51 and 52: 45IntroductionThe consumer-driven r
- Page 53 and 54: 47Background: Definitions of SDM an
- Page 55 and 56: 49• Freedom to live in the commun
- Page 57 and 58: 51providers only (Wills & Homes-Rov
- Page 59: 53SDM for Schizophrenia TreatmentBu
- Page 63 and 64: 57I interact with my consumers; I f
- Page 65 and 66: 59ReferencesAdams, J. R., & Drake,
- Page 67 and 68: 61Elwyn, G., Edwards, A., Kinnersle
- Page 69 and 70: 63Murray, E., Pollack, L., White, M
- Page 71 and 72: 65Thistlethwaite, J., Evans, R., Ti
- Page 73 and 74: 67AbstractShared decision-making is
- Page 75 and 76: 69Confronting Critical Challenges:
- Page 77 and 78: 71into treatment should still be in
- Page 79 and 80: 73these approaches, people are more
- Page 81 and 82: 75consumers to engage with their pr
- Page 83 and 84: 77that were produced in the U.S., w
- Page 85 and 86: 79a healing partnership and develop
- Page 87 and 88: 81Shared Decision-Making in Mental
- Page 89 and 90:
83However, peer support requires st
- Page 91 and 92:
85ConclusionsImplementation of SDM
- Page 93 and 94:
87Fellowes, D., Wilkinson, S., & Mo
- Page 95 and 96:
89President’s Commission for the
- Page 97 and 98:
91Supplement 3Aids to Assist Shared
- Page 99 and 100:
93IntroductionSignificance of Share
- Page 101 and 102:
95In recent years, a variety of tec
- Page 103 and 104:
97• Provide balanced information,
- Page 105 and 106:
99Form of Access or AdministrationC
- Page 107 and 108:
101ences). Some of these Web-based
- Page 109 and 110:
103video about shared decision-maki
- Page 111 and 112:
105clarify one’s own values and p
- Page 113 and 114:
107potential results, than on quant
- Page 115 and 116:
109Once again, however, it is worth
- Page 117 and 118:
111who belong to minority groups or
- Page 119 and 120:
113Hamann, J., Langer, B., Winkler,
- Page 122:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN