60Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997). <strong>Shared</strong> decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the medicalencounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Scienceand Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 44: 681-692.Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1999). <strong>Decision</strong>-mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the physician-patientencounter: Revisit<strong>in</strong>g the shared treatment decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g model. SocialScience and Medic<strong>in</strong>e, 49: 651-661.Cooper, L. A. (2006). At the center of the decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> mental health servicesand <strong>in</strong>terventions research: Patients, cl<strong>in</strong>icians, or relationships? Cl<strong>in</strong>icalPsychology: Science and Practice, 13: 26-29.de Haes, H. (2006). Dilemmas <strong>in</strong> patient centeredness and shared decision mak<strong>in</strong>g: Acase for vulnerability. Patient Education and Counsel<strong>in</strong>g, 62: 291-298.Deegan, P. E. (1996). Recovery as a journal of the heart. Psychiatric RehabilitationJournal, 19(3): 91-97.Deegan, P. E. (2007). The lived experience of us<strong>in</strong>g psychiatric medication <strong>in</strong> therecovery process, and a program to support it. Psychiatric RehabilitationJournal, 31(1): 62-69.Deegan, P. E., & Drake, R. E. (2006). <strong>Shared</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g and medication management<strong>in</strong> the recovery process. Psychiatric Services, 57(11): 1636-1639.Dembl<strong>in</strong>g, B. P., Chen, D. T., & Vachon, L. (1999). Life expectancy and causes ofdeath <strong>in</strong> a population treated for serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services,50: 1036-1042.Dudz<strong>in</strong>ski, D. M., & Sullivan, M. (2004). When agree<strong>in</strong>g with the patient is notenough: A schizophrenic woman requests pregnancy term<strong>in</strong>ation. GeneralHospital Psychiatry, 26: 475-480.Duggan, P. S., Geller, G., Cooper, L. A., & Beach, M. C. (2006). The moral nature ofpatient-centeredness: Is it “just the right th<strong>in</strong>g to do”? Patient Education andCounsel<strong>in</strong>g, 62: 271-276.Edwards, A., & Elwyn, G. (2006). Inside the black box of shared decision mak<strong>in</strong>g:Dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g between the process of <strong>in</strong>volvement and who makes the decision.<strong>Health</strong> Expectations, 9: 307-320.Elwyn, G., & Edwards, A. (2001). Evidence-based patient choice? In Elwyn, G. &Edwards, A. (Eds.), Evidence-based patient choice: Inevitable or impossible?New York: Oxford University Press.<strong>Shared</strong> <strong>Decision</strong>-<strong>Mak<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong>: Practice, Research, and Future Directions
61Elwyn, G., Edwards, A., K<strong>in</strong>nersley, P., & Grol, R. (2000). <strong>Shared</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>gand the concept of equipoise: The competences of <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g patients <strong>in</strong>healthcare choices. British Journal of General Practice, 50: 892-897.Elwyn, G., O’Connor, A., Stacey, D., Volk, R., Edwards, A., Coulter, A., et al. (2006).Develop<strong>in</strong>g a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: Onl<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong>ternational Delphi consensus process. British Medical Journal, 333(7565):417-422.Emanuel, E. J., & Emanuel, L. L. (1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship.Journal of the American Medical Association, 267: 2221-2226.Fenton, W. S. (2003). <strong>Shared</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g: A model for the physician-patientrelationship <strong>in</strong> the 21st century? Acta Psychiatrica Scand<strong>in</strong>avica, 107: 401-402.Fischer, E. P. (2006). <strong>Shared</strong> decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g and evidence-based practice: A commentary.Community <strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Journal, 42(1): 107-111.Frosch, D. L., & Kaplan, R. M. (1999). <strong>Shared</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical medic<strong>in</strong>e:Past research and future directions. American Journal of Preventive Medic<strong>in</strong>e,17(4): 285-294.Garfield, S., Francis, S. A., & Smith, F. J. (2004). Build<strong>in</strong>g concordant relationshipswith patients start<strong>in</strong>g antidepressant medication. Patient Education andCounsel<strong>in</strong>g, 55: 241-246.Goldberg, R. W., Kreyenbuhl, J. A., Medoff, D. R., Dickerson, F. B., Wohlheiter, K.,Fang, L. J., et al. (2007). Quality of diabetes care among adults with seriousmental illness. Psychiatric Services, 58: 536-543.Gravel, K., Legare, F., & Graham, I. D. (2006). Barriers and facilitators to implement<strong>in</strong>gshared decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical practice: A systematic review ofhealth professionals’ perceptions. Implementation Science, 1(16): 1-15.Hamann, J., Cohen, R., Leucht, S., Busch, R., & Kissl<strong>in</strong>g, W. (2005). Do patientswith schizophrenia wish to be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> decisions about their medicaltreatment? American Journal of Psychiatry, 162: 2382-2384.Hamann, J., Langer, B., W<strong>in</strong>kler, V., Busch, R., Cohen, R., Leucht, S., et al. (2006).<strong>Shared</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>in</strong>-patients with schizophrenia. Acta PsychiatricaScand<strong>in</strong>avica, 114: 265-273.<strong>Shared</strong> <strong>Decision</strong>-<strong>Mak<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mental</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong>: Practice, Research, and Future Directions
- Page 4:
iiContentsIntroduction ............
- Page 11 and 12:
5outpatient commitment (Holmes-Rovn
- Page 13 and 14:
7Advantages• Practitioners can be
- Page 15: 9Section 2The Practice of SharedDec
- Page 22 and 23: 16Section 3SDM ResearchCurrent rese
- Page 24: 18Mental health care providers are
- Page 27 and 28: 21want mental health treatment or d
- Page 29: 23Some participants raised concerns
- Page 37 and 38: 31Section 6ConclusionsShared decisi
- Page 39 and 40: 33Fellowes, D., Wilkinson, S., & Mo
- Page 41 and 42: 35Power, A. Kathryn. (July 10, 2007
- Page 43 and 44: 37Appendix AResourcesThis list is p
- Page 45 and 46: 39Appendix BShared Decision-MakingM
- Page 47 and 48: 41Annelle Primm, M.D., M.P.H.Direct
- Page 49 and 50: 43Supplement 1Shared Decision-Makin
- Page 51 and 52: 45IntroductionThe consumer-driven r
- Page 53 and 54: 47Background: Definitions of SDM an
- Page 55 and 56: 49• Freedom to live in the commun
- Page 57 and 58: 51providers only (Wills & Homes-Rov
- Page 59: 53SDM for Schizophrenia TreatmentBu
- Page 63 and 64: 57I interact with my consumers; I f
- Page 65: 59ReferencesAdams, J. R., & Drake,
- Page 69 and 70: 63Murray, E., Pollack, L., White, M
- Page 71 and 72: 65Thistlethwaite, J., Evans, R., Ti
- Page 73 and 74: 67AbstractShared decision-making is
- Page 75 and 76: 69Confronting Critical Challenges:
- Page 77 and 78: 71into treatment should still be in
- Page 79 and 80: 73these approaches, people are more
- Page 81 and 82: 75consumers to engage with their pr
- Page 83 and 84: 77that were produced in the U.S., w
- Page 85 and 86: 79a healing partnership and develop
- Page 87 and 88: 81Shared Decision-Making in Mental
- Page 89 and 90: 83However, peer support requires st
- Page 91 and 92: 85ConclusionsImplementation of SDM
- Page 93 and 94: 87Fellowes, D., Wilkinson, S., & Mo
- Page 95 and 96: 89President’s Commission for the
- Page 97 and 98: 91Supplement 3Aids to Assist Shared
- Page 99 and 100: 93IntroductionSignificance of Share
- Page 101 and 102: 95In recent years, a variety of tec
- Page 103 and 104: 97• Provide balanced information,
- Page 105 and 106: 99Form of Access or AdministrationC
- Page 107 and 108: 101ences). Some of these Web-based
- Page 109 and 110: 103video about shared decision-maki
- Page 111 and 112: 105clarify one’s own values and p
- Page 113 and 114: 107potential results, than on quant
- Page 115 and 116: 109Once again, however, it is worth
- Page 117 and 118:
111who belong to minority groups or
- Page 119 and 120:
113Hamann, J., Langer, B., Winkler,
- Page 122:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN