ASHESI UNIVERSITY COLLEGE - Ashesi Institutional Repository ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

% of TotalPowerDistance?CrosstabulationPower Distance? * In what way does culture create communication challenges?DictionDisconnectionCommunication challenges identifiedDiscomfort withformalityInaccuracy LanguageTotalHigh 16.9% 20.3% 10.2% 6.8% 18.6% 72.9%Low 5.1% 8.5% 3.4% 5.1% 3.4% 25.4%Missing 1.7% 1.7%Total 22.0% 30.5% 13.6% 11.9% 22.0% 100.0%Chi-Square TestsValuedfAsymp. Sig. (2-sided)Pearson Chi-Square 4.311 a 8 .828Likelihood Ratio 4.358 8 .823Linear-by-Linear Association .318 1 .573N of Valid Cases 59a. 10 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimumexpected count is .12.Symmetric MeasuresNominal by NominalValueAsymp. Std.Error a Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.Phi .270 .828Cramer's V .191 .828Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.074 .039 -.561 .577 cOrdinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.045 .121 -.342 .734 cN of Valid Cases 5959
CrosstabulationMasculine or Feminine? * In what way does culture create communication challenges?% of TotalMasculine orFeminine?DictionCommunication challenges identifiedDisconnectionDiscomfortwith formalityInaccuracy LanguageTotalMasculine 18.6% 18.6% 11.9% 10.2% 20.3% 79.7%Feminine 1.7% 6.8% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 13.6%Missing 1.7% 5.1% 6.8%Total 22.0% 30.5% 13.6% 11.9% 22.0% 100.0%Chi-Square TestsValuedfAsymp. Sig. (2-sided)Pearson Chi-Square 7.348 a 8 .500Likelihood Ratio 8.501 8 .386Linear-by-Linear Association 2.240 1 .134N of Valid Cases 59a. 10 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimumexpected count is .47.Symmetric MeasuresValueAsymp. Std.Error a Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.Nominal by NominalPhi .353 .500Cramer's V .250 .500Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.197 .065 -1.513 .136 cOrdinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.158 .109 -1.206 .233 cN of Valid Cases 5960
Page 1 and 2:
ASHESI UNIVERSITY COLLEGECROSS CULT
Page 3 and 4:
DECLARATIONI hereby declare that th
Page 5 and 6:
ABSTRACTU.S. and British negotiator
Page 7 and 8:
Bibliography ......................
Page 9 and 10:
Mesopotamia 1in ancient times. From
Page 11 and 12:
1.1 CultureGeert Hofstede defines c
Page 13 and 14:
inability to communicate their requ
Page 15 and 16: 1.6 Significance of studyIndustrial
Page 17 and 18: Chapter Four: Presentation of DataT
Page 19 and 20: embedded deeply in the everyday lif
Page 21 and 22: difficult presume it can be complet
Page 23 and 24: elusive. He states that the informa
Page 25 and 26: 2.3 CommunicationGlobalisation refe
Page 27 and 28: 2.4Theoretical frameworkGeert Hofst
Page 29 and 30: Cultures that can be described as M
Page 31 and 32: 3.2 Research Sample and Data Source
Page 33 and 34: 3.3.1 Sampling ProcedureInitially,
Page 35 and 36: Power DistanceDefined as “the ext
Page 37 and 38: data collection process were identi
Page 39 and 40: Table 1- Demographic data of respon
Page 41 and 42: Summary of FindingsTable 3- Cultura
Page 43 and 44: CHAPTER FIVEDISCUSSION, RECOMMENDAT
Page 45 and 46: - “Different” (D)Many responden
Page 47 and 48: CrosstabulationCollective or Indivi
Page 49 and 50: 3. Discomfort with rigid formalityI
Page 51 and 52: % of TotalPowerDistance?Crosstabula
Page 53 and 54: PercentageMasculinity Cultural Dime
Page 55 and 56: competence that can immensely assis
Page 57 and 58: BibliographyAdler, N. J. (1983). Cr
Page 59 and 60: Results of Poor Cross Cultural Awar
Page 61 and 62: APPENDIX B: Sample Employee Questio
Page 63 and 64: 15. I believe that we all have our
Page 65: Appendix D Results of Cross-Tabulat
show all

ASHESI UNIVERSITY COLLEGE - Ashesi Institutional Repository ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?