The GEC oversees <strong>the</strong> graduate programs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unit. Members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> GEC include many P-12school partners who host initial graduates in <strong>the</strong>ir schools. Interviews demonstrate that partners<strong>of</strong>ten call or email <strong>the</strong> MAT Director, or o<strong>the</strong>r Unit faculty, for assistance in improving programrequirements. The initial graduate level (Master <strong>of</strong> Arts in Teaching and Option 6) <strong>of</strong>fers 18certificates. There are 120 participating Kentucky school districts and 54 independents, and morethan 63 districts in Tennessee, Alaska, Arizona, California, Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, NorthCarolina, South Carolina, Alabama, Indiana, and Ohio. Through interviews and evidence <strong>of</strong>teacher mentor, candidate, and unit feedback on performance and programs, all stakeholdershave an opportunity to provide recommendations for changes to <strong>the</strong> program.A database system (EDUCAN) is in <strong>the</strong> initial stages <strong>of</strong> implementation. It is systematicallycataloging a) <strong>the</strong> kinds <strong>of</strong> diversity experiences, b) programmatic and Kentucky standards, c)schools and teachers used in <strong>the</strong> field experiences.Summary <strong>of</strong> Findings for Advanced Teacher Preparation and/or <strong>the</strong> Preparation <strong>of</strong> O<strong>the</strong>rSchool Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals:A database system (EDUCAN) for systematically cataloging <strong>the</strong> kinds <strong>of</strong> diversity experiences,programmatic and Kentucky standards, schools, and teachers, is in <strong>the</strong> initial stages <strong>of</strong>implementation.3b. Design, Implementation, and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Field Experiences and Clinical PracticeDesign, Implementation, and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Field Experiencesand Clinical Practice – Initial Teacher PreparationDesign, Implementation, and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Field Experiencesand Clinical Practice – Advanced PreparationAcceptableAcceptableSummary <strong>of</strong> Findings for Initial Teacher Preparation:The Director <strong>of</strong> Field Placement arranges field experiences for initial candidates in Pillars I andII. The Director <strong>of</strong> Undergraduate Programs/Director <strong>of</strong> Student Teaching coordinates clinicalexperiences at <strong>the</strong> undergraduate level. The Director <strong>of</strong> MAT Programs coordinates clinicalexperiences in <strong>the</strong> initial certification graduate program. Candidates and principals may requestplacements with schools and /or teachers, but <strong>the</strong>se <strong>of</strong>fices make final placement. Fieldexperiences are distributed among schools based on diversity, type <strong>of</strong> experience, and size <strong>of</strong>school. The Director <strong>of</strong> Field Placement is not identified in <strong>the</strong> staff directory but was identifiedthrough interviews.There are multiple assessments <strong>of</strong> candidate performance at <strong>the</strong> initial undergraduate andgraduate levels. At <strong>the</strong> initial level, Pillars I, II, IV, and V candidates must complete a FieldExperience Reporting/Timesheet for all field experiences. This form is delivered to <strong>the</strong> directors<strong>of</strong> field placement and MAT. The form identifies <strong>the</strong> specific nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> field experience andactions taken by <strong>the</strong> candidate. Candidates are evaluated by course instructors on dispositionsand standards throughout Pillar II. Supervising teachers, content area specialists, and <strong>the</strong>16
directors <strong>of</strong> student teaching or MAT also evaluate <strong>the</strong> candidates in <strong>the</strong> clinical semester. Thecandidates self-reflect throughout <strong>the</strong> field and clinical experiences.The MAT director receives requests for clinical placement. The form includes minimumrequirements for student teacher placement. Placement is determined based on availability <strong>of</strong>supervising teacher and district mentor. Option 6 candidates are employed in Kentucky schools.They also complete a school request, and placement is dependent on availability <strong>of</strong> a qualifiedsupervising teacher. The staff directory does not identify <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MAT director andOption 6 Director. Through interviews, <strong>the</strong> directors were identified.A database system (EDUCAN) for systematically cataloging <strong>the</strong> kinds <strong>of</strong> diversity experiences,programmatic and Kentucky standards, schools, and teachers, is in <strong>the</strong> initial stages <strong>of</strong>implementation.Summary <strong>of</strong> Findings for Advanced Teacher Preparation and/or <strong>the</strong> Preparation <strong>of</strong> O<strong>the</strong>rSchool Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals:Field experiences are coordinated through individual course pr<strong>of</strong>essors. Those field experiencesare recorded and delivered to <strong>the</strong> course pr<strong>of</strong>essor. The instructor delivers to <strong>the</strong> DatabaseManager <strong>the</strong> completed field experience hours, rubric, and instructor evaluation. For certificateprograms, <strong>the</strong> certification <strong>of</strong>ficer also maintains files and reviews cases for regulationscompliance. The program director (through <strong>the</strong> Course Managers), except in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> MAED,evaluates <strong>the</strong> syllabus, field experiences, key assessments, and any exceptions or changes to aMaster Syllabus.A database system (EDUCAN) for regularly cataloging <strong>the</strong> kinds <strong>of</strong> diversity experiences,programmatic and Kentucky standards, schools, and teachers, is in <strong>the</strong> initial stages <strong>of</strong>implementation.3c. Candidates' Development and Demonstration <strong>of</strong> Knowledge, Skills, and Pr<strong>of</strong>essionalDispositions to Help All Students LearnCandidates’ Development and Demonstration <strong>of</strong> Knowledge,Skills, and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Dispositions to Help All Students Learn– Initial Teacher PreparationCandidates’ Development and Demonstration <strong>of</strong> Knowledge,Skills, and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Dispositions to Help All Students Learn– Advanced PreparationAcceptableAcceptableSummary <strong>of</strong> Findings for Initial Teacher Preparation:Field experiences prior to <strong>the</strong> clinical semester are evaluated using <strong>the</strong> Field ExperienceReporting/Timesheet and <strong>the</strong> KTIP/IPR. At <strong>the</strong> initial level in clinical settings, bothundergraduate and graduate candidates are evaluated for demonstration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Kentucky TeacherStandards, Unit Standards, Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Content Knowledge, and Dispositions. There is regularand systematic contact between candidates and <strong>the</strong> Directors <strong>of</strong> Student Teaching, MAT (or17
- Page 1 and 2: BOARD OF EXAMINERSReportBoard of Ex
- Page 3 and 4: SUMMARY FOR PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION
- Page 5 and 6: UC, graduate study prepares profess
- Page 7 and 8: 1b. Pedagogical Content Knowledge a
- Page 9 and 10: Table 1c.1.2 provides assessment re
- Page 11 and 12: Professional Dispositions for All C
- Page 13 and 14: Data Collection, Analysis, and Eval
- Page 15: in the Reading Specialist program a
- Page 19 and 20: AFIs from last visit: Continued - N
- Page 21 and 22: Summary of Findings for Initial Tea
- Page 23 and 24: Recommendation for Standard 4Initia
- Page 25 and 26: 5c. Modeling Best Professional Prac
- Page 27 and 28: professional development experience
- Page 29 and 30: of the minutes and other documentat
- Page 31 and 32: was hired. This position maintains
- Page 33 and 34: IV.SOURCES OF EVIDENCEDocuments rev
- Page 35 and 36: 1b.3. Employer Survey1b.3. Table 1a
- Page 37 and 38: 2a.1. Table 2a.1.7. Key Assessments
- Page 39 and 40: 2c.2. Department Minutes, 10/29/082
- Page 41 and 42: 3b.2. Table 3b.2.1 Field Experience
- Page 43 and 44: 3c.4. Table 6.3 Unit Assessment Sys
- Page 45 and 46: 4b.2. Table 4b.3.1 Faculty Demograp
- Page 47 and 48: 6c.6. Faculty Development Funds6d.1
- Page 49 and 50: Christopher LeskiwJames ManningJenn
- Page 51 and 52: Russell Weedman, ArtAdjunct Faculty
- Page 53 and 54: Recent GraduatesDana HaleSteven Mos
- Page 55 and 56: 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4 field experience
- Page 57: certification), and Rank I, Ed.S. a