Standard 6: Unit Governance and ResourcesThe unit has <strong>the</strong> leadership, authority, budget, personnel, facilities, and resources, including informationtechnology resources, for <strong>the</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> candidates to meet pr<strong>of</strong>essional, state, and institutionalstandards.Information reported in <strong>the</strong> Institutional Report for Standard 6 was validated in <strong>the</strong> exhibits andinterviews.X Yes □ No6a. Unit Leadership and AuthorityUnit Leadership and Authority – Initial Teacher PreparationUnit Leadership and Authority – Advanced PreparationAcceptableAcceptableSummary <strong>of</strong> Findings:The Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Education Unit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cumberlands</strong> consists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> initialundergraduate, initial graduate, advanced and school pr<strong>of</strong>essionals programs. It is composed <strong>of</strong>all programs which prepare teachers or certified school personnel in <strong>the</strong> colleges <strong>of</strong> Education.These include: Elementary P-5, Middle School 5-9, Secondary 8-12, P-12 Art, Music, PE,Health, Business and Marketing 5-12, Special Education- LBD, Reading and Writing, SchoolCounseling, Instructional Leadership Principal and O<strong>the</strong>r School Administration/Leadership.Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> documentation verifies <strong>the</strong> organizational structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unit. The organizationis led by <strong>the</strong> chair <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> department who oversees all <strong>the</strong> education programs. The programdirectors, (3 individuals directing <strong>the</strong> initial undergraduate, initial graduate, advanced and o<strong>the</strong>rschool pr<strong>of</strong>essionals programs) who are appointed by <strong>the</strong> chair, oversee <strong>the</strong> education programsat all three levels. The program coordinators (10 individuals) supervise <strong>the</strong> various fields <strong>of</strong>study within <strong>the</strong> unit. The next level <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> organizational chart is <strong>the</strong> course managers whoensure that <strong>the</strong> syllabi have common objectives, key assessments, and outcomes.There are two governance bodies that oversee <strong>the</strong> policies and procedures. The TeacherEducation and Admission Committee (TEAC) is responsible for <strong>the</strong> traditional initialundergraduate programs. The Graduate Education Committee (GEC) is responsible for <strong>the</strong>initial graduate, advanced, and o<strong>the</strong>r school pr<strong>of</strong>essionals programs. These committees areresponsible for curricular areas such as curricular changes, new programs, assessment datareviews, admission and retention <strong>of</strong> candidates into <strong>the</strong> education programs, adoption,development, and review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unit’s policies. The Graduate Education committee consists <strong>of</strong>14 members. There are representatives from <strong>the</strong> graduate education program, <strong>the</strong> vice presidentfor academic affairs, <strong>the</strong> vice president for student services, <strong>the</strong> registrar, <strong>the</strong> teacher certification<strong>of</strong>ficer, and a library representative. The education department chair serves as <strong>the</strong> director <strong>of</strong>graduate studies and is <strong>the</strong> chair <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> committee. There is also a graduate assistantrepresentative. The composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TEAC is composed <strong>of</strong> 30 members including chair <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>education department (committee chair), <strong>the</strong> registrar (assistant committee chair), and <strong>the</strong> fulltimefaculty members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> education department, <strong>the</strong> teacher certification <strong>of</strong>ficer, and <strong>the</strong> chair<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> academic department. The committee selects its own student representative. The review28
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> minutes and o<strong>the</strong>r documentation recognizes that <strong>the</strong>re is P-12 representation at <strong>the</strong>meetings. This is also verified through interviews with school level administrators andsuperintendents, as discussed in <strong>the</strong> IR on page 91.The unit ensures that candidates have access to student support services such as advising andcounseling. There is an advising process in place in all unit programs. Based on interviews withcandidates and faculty, <strong>the</strong>re is a key faculty member identified to assign faculty advisors foreach initial undergraduate candidate. At <strong>the</strong> initial graduate, advanced, and o<strong>the</strong>r schoolpr<strong>of</strong>essionals level, candidates are assigned faculty advisors by <strong>the</strong> Graduate Advising Center(GAC). The role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> GAC is to register candidates for <strong>the</strong>ir initial classes, teach candidateshow to manage <strong>the</strong>ir own online registration, and provide assistance and support to advisors. Asper <strong>the</strong> documentation, <strong>the</strong> GAC also sends an orientation packet to students upon admission to<strong>the</strong> university.The unit publishes its recruiting polices and its admission, retention and exit policies in <strong>the</strong><strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Cumberlands</strong> catalog. Admissions and recruiting polices are described clearlyand consistently in publications and catalogues. Academic calendars, catalogues, publications,grading policies, and advertising are accurate and current.6b. Unit BudgetUnit Budget – Initial Teacher PreparationUnit Budget – Advanced PreparationAcceptableAcceptableSummary <strong>of</strong> Findings:The Education Department’s base budget in 2009-2010 was $4,895,657.00 compared to <strong>the</strong>university’s $33,408,615.00. In all unit programs this represents 11.7% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> university’s totalannual budget. The unit also received $406,600.00 in private gifts, grants, and contracts in 2008-2009. This is a 6.2% increase since 2006-2007. The funding for <strong>the</strong> unit at all levels appearsadequate and comparable to that <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r units.Financial reports indicate that <strong>the</strong> unit receives a budget for non-personnel costs which isallocated for items such as printing and equipment. The unit receives pr<strong>of</strong>essional developmentmonies from an endowment fund which is separate from <strong>the</strong> unit budget. Each full-time facultymember receives $800.00 and part-time faculty receive $400.00 in all unit programs forconferences, workshops, and travel expenses. There is a separate budget allocated for unitpersonnel. The library provides <strong>the</strong> unit with two separate library allocations for <strong>the</strong>undergraduate and graduate levels. Faculty have input in how those monies are spent.Information was obtained through documentation and interviews.The recent changes to <strong>the</strong> budget clearly indicate an increase in <strong>the</strong> funding allocated foracademic expenses in <strong>the</strong> unit based on documentation and interviews. The unit added threefaculty positions in <strong>the</strong> summer <strong>of</strong> 2010 due to an increase in enrollment in <strong>the</strong> unit’s graduateand advanced programs. The budget allows all faculty to engage in pr<strong>of</strong>essional development.29
- Page 1 and 2: BOARD OF EXAMINERSReportBoard of Ex
- Page 3 and 4: SUMMARY FOR PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION
- Page 5 and 6: UC, graduate study prepares profess
- Page 7 and 8: 1b. Pedagogical Content Knowledge a
- Page 9 and 10: Table 1c.1.2 provides assessment re
- Page 11 and 12: Professional Dispositions for All C
- Page 13 and 14: Data Collection, Analysis, and Eval
- Page 15 and 16: in the Reading Specialist program a
- Page 17 and 18: directors of student teaching or MA
- Page 19 and 20: AFIs from last visit: Continued - N
- Page 21 and 22: Summary of Findings for Initial Tea
- Page 23 and 24: Recommendation for Standard 4Initia
- Page 25 and 26: 5c. Modeling Best Professional Prac
- Page 27: professional development experience
- Page 31 and 32: was hired. This position maintains
- Page 33 and 34: IV.SOURCES OF EVIDENCEDocuments rev
- Page 35 and 36: 1b.3. Employer Survey1b.3. Table 1a
- Page 37 and 38: 2a.1. Table 2a.1.7. Key Assessments
- Page 39 and 40: 2c.2. Department Minutes, 10/29/082
- Page 41 and 42: 3b.2. Table 3b.2.1 Field Experience
- Page 43 and 44: 3c.4. Table 6.3 Unit Assessment Sys
- Page 45 and 46: 4b.2. Table 4b.3.1 Faculty Demograp
- Page 47 and 48: 6c.6. Faculty Development Funds6d.1
- Page 49 and 50: Christopher LeskiwJames ManningJenn
- Page 51 and 52: Russell Weedman, ArtAdjunct Faculty
- Page 53 and 54: Recent GraduatesDana HaleSteven Mos
- Page 55 and 56: 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4 field experience
- Page 57: certification), and Rank I, Ed.S. a