Kentucky Teacher Internship Program (KTIP), and over half have completed a course insupervision.Full-time and part-time faculty in supervisory roles have relevant and contemporary experiencesin P-12 schools. These experiences include serving as practitioners, administrators, supervisors,and counselors in a variety <strong>of</strong> P-12 settings, and working collaboratively with P-12 partners on avariety <strong>of</strong> initiatives (e.g., workshops and collaborative grant projects).5b. Modeling Best Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practices in TeachingModeling Best Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practices in Teaching – InitialTeacher PreparationModeling Best Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practices in Teaching – AdvancedPreparationAcceptableAcceptableSummary <strong>of</strong> Findings:Course syllabi, exhibits, and interviews with faculty and candidates in initial and advancedprograms indicate that unit faculty model best pedagogical practices. These practices areconsistent with <strong>the</strong> conceptual framework in that candidates are required to reflect continuouslyon <strong>the</strong>ir teaching and to engage in collaborative inquiry and active learning throughout <strong>the</strong>irprogram. Candidates report that faculty use a variety <strong>of</strong> assessment practices, including lessonplans, portfolios, case studies, and a number <strong>of</strong> formative assessments (“quick writes,” “bellringers,” etc.) to determine candidate learning. These data support information in Table 5b.1.a,which shows that unit faculty uses a variety <strong>of</strong> instructional methods that reflect <strong>the</strong> conceptualframework.Technology is incorporated into pr<strong>of</strong>essional courses in a variety <strong>of</strong> ways, e.g., electronicportfolios, media, You-Tube videos, electronic communication, web-based forums, electronicdatabases, and Smart boards. All graduate programs are on-line; <strong>the</strong>refore, faculty and studentsuse a variety <strong>of</strong> communication formats, such as chats, discussion boards, teams, breakoutrooms, and interactive conferencing.On-site evidence confirms that many unit faculty provide candidates with intentional diversityexperiences through <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> videos, discussions, guest speakers, and field trips to variousclinical sites. Candidates in all programs are required to document and reflect on <strong>the</strong>irexperiences working with diverse student populations. They are also required to considerstudents’ cultural backgrounds and unique learning needs in lesson planning and delivery.Faculty self-evaluation is part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> annual faculty review process. Recently, faculty in <strong>the</strong> unithave begun to implement a system <strong>of</strong> peer review using <strong>the</strong> ten Kentucky Teacher Standards asan evaluative framework. Faculty use information from this peer review process in developingplans for enhancing <strong>the</strong>ir pedagogical practices.24
5c. Modeling Best Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practices in ScholarshipModeling Best Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practices in Scholarship – InitialTeacher PreparationModeling Best Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practices in Scholarship – AdvancedPreparationAcceptableAcceptableSummary <strong>of</strong> Findings:The university and unit definition <strong>of</strong> scholarship is consistent with <strong>the</strong> primary commitment <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> institution, which is quality teaching. The university Policies and Procedures Handbookdescribes <strong>the</strong> scholarly work expected <strong>of</strong> faculty as “publications, presentations, attendance atconferences, pr<strong>of</strong>essional memberships, etc.” (Policies and Procedures, Addendum for Faculty,p. 15). Scholarship is one <strong>of</strong> five areas that is reviewed for tenure and promotion <strong>of</strong> faculty.Unit faculty demonstrate a diverse array <strong>of</strong> scholarly activities, as documented through facultyvitae, on-site exhibits, faculty self-evaluations, and annual institutional reports (e.g., Serving AsExamples booklets, which highlight faculty and staff pr<strong>of</strong>essional activities each year). Themajority <strong>of</strong> full-time and part-time faculty has engaged in scholarship. Examples <strong>of</strong> scholarlyactivities include publishing in refereed journals; presenting papers at state, regional, national,and international conferences related to <strong>the</strong>ir areas <strong>of</strong> expertise; serving as keynote or guestspeakers at various state and national events; serving as reviewers for forthcoming publications;and attending conferences and participating in o<strong>the</strong>r pr<strong>of</strong>essional growth activities. A few unitfaculty members have published books or have assisted in editing published volumes. Datasources that were reviewed indicate that most unit faculty are actively involved in pr<strong>of</strong>essionalorganizations related to <strong>the</strong>ir fields <strong>of</strong> expertise.5d. Modeling Best Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practices in ServiceModeling Best Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practices in Service – Initial TeacherPreparationModeling Best Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Practices in Service – AdvancedPreparationAcceptableAcceptableSummary <strong>of</strong> Findings:All faculty at <strong>the</strong> institution are required to provide both institutional and community service. Asnoted in <strong>the</strong> institutional report (p. 86), “The mission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional education unitincorporates <strong>the</strong> institutional mission by emphasizing <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> leadership andcommunity service as a moral and ethical duty.” Table 5d.2.1 documents <strong>the</strong> vast array <strong>of</strong>services provided by unit faculty. These include membership on various unit and campuscommittees, serving in a variety <strong>of</strong> administrative roles within <strong>the</strong> unit, and voluntary service in anumber <strong>of</strong> civic, pr<strong>of</strong>essional, and religious organizations. As documented through faculty vitaeand <strong>the</strong> annual Serving as Examples publication, faculty service includes (but is not limited to)KEA-SP advisor; KTIP teacher educator; various state task forces and advisory committees;local councils; invited guest presentations; school consultant; school volunteer; church volunteer.25
- Page 1 and 2: BOARD OF EXAMINERSReportBoard of Ex
- Page 3 and 4: SUMMARY FOR PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION
- Page 5 and 6: UC, graduate study prepares profess
- Page 7 and 8: 1b. Pedagogical Content Knowledge a
- Page 9 and 10: Table 1c.1.2 provides assessment re
- Page 11 and 12: Professional Dispositions for All C
- Page 13 and 14: Data Collection, Analysis, and Eval
- Page 15 and 16: in the Reading Specialist program a
- Page 17 and 18: directors of student teaching or MA
- Page 19 and 20: AFIs from last visit: Continued - N
- Page 21 and 22: Summary of Findings for Initial Tea
- Page 23: Recommendation for Standard 4Initia
- Page 27 and 28: professional development experience
- Page 29 and 30: of the minutes and other documentat
- Page 31 and 32: was hired. This position maintains
- Page 33 and 34: IV.SOURCES OF EVIDENCEDocuments rev
- Page 35 and 36: 1b.3. Employer Survey1b.3. Table 1a
- Page 37 and 38: 2a.1. Table 2a.1.7. Key Assessments
- Page 39 and 40: 2c.2. Department Minutes, 10/29/082
- Page 41 and 42: 3b.2. Table 3b.2.1 Field Experience
- Page 43 and 44: 3c.4. Table 6.3 Unit Assessment Sys
- Page 45 and 46: 4b.2. Table 4b.3.1 Faculty Demograp
- Page 47 and 48: 6c.6. Faculty Development Funds6d.1
- Page 49 and 50: Christopher LeskiwJames ManningJenn
- Page 51 and 52: Russell Weedman, ArtAdjunct Faculty
- Page 53 and 54: Recent GraduatesDana HaleSteven Mos
- Page 55 and 56: 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4 field experience
- Page 57: certification), and Rank I, Ed.S. a