JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION - Naspaa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Public Service Education: Adding Value in the Public InterestReferencesAlexander, F.K. (2000). The changing face of accountability: Monitoring and assessing institutionalperformance in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 411-430.Aristigueta, M., & Gomes, K.M.B. (2006). Assessing performance in NASPAA graduate programs.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12(1), 1-18.Beaumont, E. (2005). The challenge of assessing civic engagement: What we know and what we stillneed to learn about civic education in college. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11(4), 287-303.Boyle, P., & Whitaker, G. (2001).Education for the new public service: Implications of thetransformation of governance. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 7(4), 267-279.Brinkerhoff, R.O. (Ed.). (1989). Evaluating training programs in business and industry. New Directionsfor Program Evaluation. (No 44). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Brinkerhoff, R.O., & Apking, A.M. (2001). High impact learning. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.Brown, R.E., & Reed, C.S. (2002). An integral approach to evaluating outcome evaluation training.American Journal of Evaluation, 23(1), 1-17.Carter, S.D. (2002). Matching training methods and factors of cognitive ability: A means to improvetraining outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(1), 71-87.Castleberry, T.E. (2006). Student learning outcome assessment within the Texas State University MPAProgram. Texas State University: Applied Research Projects. Retrieved Nov. 19, 2007, from http://ecommons.txstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1184&context=arpChampagne, N. (2006). Using the NCHEC areas of responsibility to assess service learning outcomesin undergraduate health education students. American Journal of Health Education, 37(3), 137-146.Cleary, R.E. (1990). What do public administration masters programs look like? Do they do what isneeded? Public Administration Review, 50, 663-669.Downs, A. (1962, Spring). The public interest: Its meaning in a democracy. Social Research, 1-36.Durant, R.F. (2002). Toward becoming a learning organization: Outcomes assessment, NASPAAaccreditation, and mission-based capstone courses. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 8(3), 193-208.Fenwick, T. J. (2002). Problem-based learning, group process and the mid-career professional:Implications for graduate education. Higher Education Research and Development, 21(1), 5-21.Fitzpatrick, J.L., & Miller-Stevens, K. (2009). A case study of measuring outcomes in an MPAprogram. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(1), 17-31.Ford, K.J., Quiñones, M.A., Sego, D.J., & Sorra, J.S. (1992). Factors affecting the opportunity toperform trained tasks on the job. Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 511-527.Gecas, V. (1989). The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 291-316.Journal of Public Affairs Education 225
Public Service Education: Adding Value in the Public InterestGoodsell, C.T. (1990). Public administration and the public interest. In G.L. Wamsley et al. (Eds.),Refounding public administration (pp. 96-113). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Hamblin, A.C. (1974). Evaluation and control of training. London: McGraw Hill.Herbert, T., & Reynolds, K. (1998). MPA learning outcomes: Does the cohort format make adifference? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 4(4), 253-262.Holton, E.E. (1996). The flawed four-level evaluation model. Human Resource Development Quarterly,8(2), 95-113.Jennings, E.T. (1989). Accountability, program quality, outcome assessment, and graduate educationfor public affairs and administration. Public Administration Review, 49(5), 438-446.Kee, J., & Newcomer, K.E. (2008). Transforming public and nonprofit organizations. Vienna, VA:Management Concepts.Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of ASTD, 13(11), 3-9.Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1976). Evaluating training programs. New York: McGraw-Hill.Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1998). Evaluating training programs (2 nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Knowles, M. (1990). The adult learner: A neglected species (4 th ed.). Houston: Gulf.Lee, S.H., & Pershing, J.A. (2002). Dimensions and design criteria for developing training reactionevaluations. Human Resource Development International, 5(2), 175-197.Lee, Y. (2006). Examining the effect of small group discussions and question prompts on vicariouslearning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 66-80.Lucas, W.A., & Cooper, S.Y. (2004). Enhancing self-efficacy to enable entrepreneurship: The case ofCMI’s connections. MIT Sloan Working Paper 4489-04. Retrieved May 3, 2009, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=568383Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.McLaughlin, J.A., & Jordan, G.B. (2004). Using logic models. In J.S. Wholey, H.P. Hatry, & K.E.Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (2 nd ed.), (pp. 96-113). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.Michlitsch, J., & Sidle, M.W. (2002). Assessing student learning outcomes: A comparative study oftechniques used in business schools. Journal of Education for Business, 77(3), 125-130.Mitchell, J. (1991). Education and skills for public authority management. Public AdministrationReview, 51(5), 429-437.National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA). (2008, January).General information and standards for professional master’s degree programs. Retrieved May 3,2009, from http://www.naspaa.org/accreditation/seeking/reference/ standards.asp226 Journal of Public Affairs Education
Page 2 and 3:
National Association of Schools of
Page 4 and 5:
From the Editor — Special 15th An
Page 6 and 7:
Reflections on theJournal of Public
Page 8 and 9:
Reflections On the Journal of Publi
Page 10 and 11:
Emotional Labor: Why and How to Tea
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Preparing for and Responding toStud
Page 31 and 32:
Preparing for and Responding to Stu
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Safeguarding the Public Trust: Can
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60: Safeguarding the Public Trust: Can
Page 67 and 68: Teaching Administrative Ethics in N
Page 93 and 94: Public Service Education: Adding Va
Page 109: Public Service Education: Adding Va
Page 115 and 116: Knowledge Transfer of EducationalPr
Page 117 and 118: Knowledge Transfer of Educational P
Page 139 and 140: Methods Taught In Public Policy Pro
Page 161 and 162:
Information Literacy inPublic Affai
Page 163 and 164:
Information Literacy in Public Affa
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Conversation StartersLet’s Get Th
Page 191 and 192:
Conversation Starters — Let’s G
Page 193 and 194:
Conversation Starters — Let’s G
Page 195 and 196:
Review ofThe Application of Statist
Page 197 and 198:
Review of The Application of Statis
Page 199 and 200:
Review of The Application of Statis
Page 201 and 202:
Call for PapersThe Innovation Journ
Page 203:
National Association of Schools of
show all

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS EDUCATION - Naspaa

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?