13.07.2015 Views

Download the PDF (5.4 MB) - Nedbank Group Limited

Download the PDF (5.4 MB) - Nedbank Group Limited

Download the PDF (5.4 MB) - Nedbank Group Limited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

298 NEDBANK GROUP <strong>Limited</strong> INTEGRATED REPORT 20106 FAIR-VALUE MEASUREMENT ... continued6.6 Effect of changes in significant unobservable assumptions to reasonable possible alternativesAs discussed above <strong>the</strong> fair-value measurement of financial instruments are, in certain circumstances, measured using valuation techniquesthat include assumptions that are not market observable. Where <strong>the</strong>se scenarios apply, <strong>the</strong> group performs stress testing on <strong>the</strong> fair valueof <strong>the</strong> relevant instruments. In performing <strong>the</strong> stress testing, appropriate levels for <strong>the</strong> unobservable input parameters are chosen so that<strong>the</strong>y are consistent with prevailing market evidence and in line with <strong>the</strong> group’s approach to valuation control.In accordance with IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosure, <strong>the</strong> following information is intended to illustrate <strong>the</strong> potential impact of <strong>the</strong>relative uncertainty in <strong>the</strong> fair value of financial instruments for which valuation is dependent on unobservable input parameters. However,it is unlikely in practice that all unobservable parameters would simultaneously be at <strong>the</strong> extremes of <strong>the</strong>ir ranges of reasonably possiblealternatives. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> disclosure is nei<strong>the</strong>r predictive nor indicative of future movements in fair value.The following table shows <strong>the</strong> effect on fair value of changes in unobservable input parameters to reasonable possible alternative assumptions:PrincipleassumptionstressedStressparameters%Statement offinancialposition valueRmFavourablechange in fairvalue due tostress testRmUnfavourablechange in fairvalue due tostress testRm2010AssetsGovernment and o<strong>the</strong>r securities Credit spreads Between (25)and 25 47 1 (1)Loans and advances Credit spreads Between (25)and 25 36 * *Investment securitiesValuation multiples,correlations, volatilitiesand credit spreadsBetween (20)and 201 599 243 (268)Investments in associate companies Valuation multiples Between (10)and joint venturesand 10 912 88 (88)Total financial assets classified at level 3 2 594 332 (357)LiabilitiesDerivative financial instruments* Represents amounts less than R1 million.2009AssetsDerivative financial instrumentsCorrelations, volatilitiesand credit spreadsBetween (33)and 33 10 3 (3)Correlations, volatilitiesand credit spreadsGovernment and o<strong>the</strong>r securities Credit spreads Between (20)and 20 55 1 (1)Loans and advances Credit spreads Between (20)and 20 82 * *Between (25)and 25 16 13 (13)Investment securitiesCorrelations, volatilities Between (20)and credit spreads and 20 2 489 235 (300)Investments in associate companies Valuation multiples Between (6)and joint venturesand 6 908 57 (57)Total financial assets classified at level 3 3 550 306 (371)LiabilitiesDerivative financial instruments* Represents amounts less than R1 million.Correlations, volatilitiesand credit spreadsBetween (25)and 25 53 9 (9)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!