Chapter 1renewed <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> detect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>chromosome</strong> rearrangements <strong>in</strong> recent years (Lim et al. 2008b;Pires and Hertweck 2008; Xie et al. 2010; Xiong et al. 2011). GISH, comb<strong>in</strong>ed with FISH,allows the discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> alien <strong>chromosome</strong>s/segments and the identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<strong>chromosome</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids and backcross<strong>in</strong>g progenies (Barba-Gonzalez et al.2005b; Khan et al. 2009a; Lim et al. 2001b; Schwarzacher et al. 1992; Schwarzacher et al.1989; Stevenson et al. 1998; Zhou et al. 2008b). S<strong>in</strong>ce its successful application <strong>in</strong> detect<strong>in</strong>gand analyz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tergenomic recomb<strong>in</strong>ation between homoeologous genomes, the techniquehas been already used for detect<strong>in</strong>g crossover events through <strong>analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> anaphase I cells(Stevenson et al. 1998; Takahashi et al. 1997; Xie et al. 2010; Zhou et al. 2008a). Theparticular advantage <strong>of</strong> this system is that the two chromatids <strong>of</strong> each homoeologues have thesame label<strong>in</strong>g status, and therefore all crossover exchanges between non-sister chromatidswill be visible. As a result, it enables the accurate observation <strong>of</strong> homoeologous <strong>chromosome</strong>behaviours dur<strong>in</strong>g meiosis. As po<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> a previous publication (Xie et al. 2010), thenonreciprocal and reciprocal recomb<strong>in</strong>ation both orig<strong>in</strong>ated from a natural meiosis processchiasmataformation and cross<strong>in</strong>g over between homoeologous chromatids, that is also thereason that the term “translocation” is not accurate <strong>in</strong> Brassica napus (Nicolas et al. 2007;Park<strong>in</strong> et al. 1995; Sharpe et al. 1995; Udall et al. 2005); As a result, some genera, whichconsist <strong>of</strong> divergent genomes and large <strong>chromosome</strong>s, viz. Tulipa, <strong>Lilium</strong>, Alstroemeria andso on, are ideal for the GISH <strong>analysis</strong>. However, several disadvantages are also unavoidablefor detect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>chromosome</strong> rearrangements us<strong>in</strong>g DNA <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization. the first one is itspoor resolution which made small recomb<strong>in</strong>ations <strong>in</strong>visible. Meanwhile, some k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong>rearrangements like duplication and deletion are, however, very difficult to dist<strong>in</strong>guish;another shortage is that GISH is very experimental demand<strong>in</strong>g and labor-<strong>in</strong>tensive. Besidethese, GISH can only detect <strong>chromosome</strong> variations between homoeologous andnonhomologous <strong>chromosome</strong>s. With their pros and cons <strong>of</strong> <strong>molecular</strong> markers and <strong>molecular</strong><strong>cytogenetic</strong> techniques, there is a tendency that the comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> these two methods will leadto relatively accurate results, which has been used <strong>in</strong> several reports.With the development <strong>of</strong> modern <strong>molecular</strong> biology, some <strong>in</strong>novational methods, such aswhole genome sequenc<strong>in</strong>g and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) which givedetailed and <strong>in</strong>formative sequence <strong>in</strong>formation, have become available recently. Array-basedcomparative genomic hybridization allows high-resolution screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> copy numberabnormalities <strong>in</strong> the genome, and becomes an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important tool to detect deletionsand duplications <strong>in</strong> the whole genome (Knijnenburg et al. 2005).6
General IntroductionScope for detection and <strong>analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> chromosomal rearrangements <strong>in</strong> liliesLily has been a model plant for <strong>cytogenetic</strong> research for more than one century. Lily speciesare predom<strong>in</strong>antly diploid (2n=2x=24) with the exceptions <strong>of</strong> L. tigr<strong>in</strong>um and L. bulbiferum <strong>in</strong>which triploids (2n=36) are also present. S<strong>in</strong>ce Strasburger’s paper on the <strong>chromosome</strong>s <strong>of</strong><strong>Lilium</strong> (Strasburger 1880), many researchers, us<strong>in</strong>g lily species, have focused on the study <strong>of</strong><strong>chromosome</strong> morphology and karyotype <strong>analysis</strong>, meiosis studies, <strong>chromosome</strong> band<strong>in</strong>g andso on (Anderson et al. 1994; Bach Holm 1976; Fogwill 1957; Noda 1978; Son 1977; Son andSong 1978; Stack et al. 1989; Stewart 1947). Furthermore, some structural aberrations <strong>in</strong> thediploid species and <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids have also been detected by critically observation <strong>of</strong>mitotic and meiotic <strong>chromosome</strong> configurations. In an X-ray treated L. formosanum,paracentric <strong>in</strong>version was detected accord<strong>in</strong>g to the association configuration and the resultantdicentric and acentric fragments (Brown and Zohary 1955). In a natural population <strong>of</strong> L.maximowiczii, reciprocal translocation was characterized by the multivalent formation andabnormal segregation at anaphase I dur<strong>in</strong>g meiosis(Noda 1960). In addition, <strong>in</strong> the<strong>in</strong>trasectional hybrids <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lilium</strong> martagon var. album × L. hansonii, <strong>in</strong>version was alsoobserved by abnormalities <strong>of</strong> meiosis I (Richardson 1936). S<strong>in</strong>ce lily is not a lead<strong>in</strong>g cropand its long generation time, previous studies only focused on normal <strong>cytogenetic</strong> research,with little <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>in</strong> produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>cytogenetic</strong> stocks like addition and substitution l<strong>in</strong>es.Current commercial breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> lily aims at comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g desirable traits together through<strong>in</strong>terspecific hybridization and backcross<strong>in</strong>g. S<strong>in</strong>ce the end <strong>of</strong> 20 th century, <strong>in</strong>terspecifichybrids and polyploids have been two ma<strong>in</strong> characters <strong>of</strong> the new lily cultivars (Van Tuyl andLim 2003), these cultivars are the comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> two or more homoeologous genomes fromgenetically divergent parental species. Such allopolyploids are ideal for analyz<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>tergenomic rearrangements us<strong>in</strong>g GISH for two ma<strong>in</strong> reasons: firstly, the lily genomebelongs to the biggest <strong>in</strong> the plant k<strong>in</strong>gdom (250 fold larger than that <strong>of</strong> Arabidopsis) and the<strong>chromosome</strong>s are very big which make the cytological observation easily (Leutwiler et al.1984; Zonneveld et al. 2005); Secondly, the genomes <strong>of</strong> different hybrid groups are so highlydivergent that make the differentiation <strong>of</strong> each genome obviously and the structuralrearrangements, if any, be detected accurately.As mentioned above, the occurrence <strong>of</strong> <strong>chromosome</strong> rearrangements <strong>in</strong> the newly formedallopolyploids has been revealed <strong>in</strong> many polyploid species. Like other plant taxa, how thesegenomes <strong>in</strong>teract and harmonize with one another <strong>in</strong> lily <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids as well as thebackcross<strong>in</strong>g progenies is a topic <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests for many researchers. Though a critically<strong>analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> the neopolyploids <strong>of</strong> lily, <strong>in</strong>formation about the orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> polyploids,homoeologous genome <strong>in</strong>teraction and the speciation <strong>of</strong> allopolyploids can be acquired. As aresult, GISH has already been successfully applied <strong>in</strong> lily hybrids for study<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tergenomic7
- Page 3 and 4: A molecular cytogenetic analysis of
- Page 5: Table of ContentsChapter 1General I
- Page 8 and 9: Chapter 1LilyLilies belong to genus
- Page 10 and 11: Chapter 1counterparts (Finnegan 200
- Page 14 and 15: Chapter 1recombination, mechanisms
- Page 16 and 17: Chapter 1is only an equational segr
- Page 18 and 19: Chapter 1quite divergent with vario
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter 2An assessment of chromosom
- Page 23 and 24: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 25 and 26: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 27 and 28: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 29 and 30: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 31 and 32: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 33 and 34: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 35 and 36: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 3Elucidation of intergenomi
- Page 39 and 40: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 41 and 42: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 43 and 44: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 45 and 46: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 47 and 48: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 49: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 52 and 53: Chapter 4AbstractMeiotic abnormalit
- Page 54 and 55: Chapter 4There are some criteria to
- Page 56 and 57: Chapter 4FISH experiments were perf
- Page 58 and 59: Chapter 4was apparently shorter, wi
- Page 60 and 61: Chapter 4bridges is explained as U-
- Page 62 and 63:
Chapter 4of the sexual polyploidize
- Page 64 and 65:
Chapter 4fragment have the same len
- Page 66 and 67:
Chapter 5AbstractSupernumerary (B)
- Page 68 and 69:
Chapter 5their origin, the structur
- Page 70 and 71:
Chapter 5Fig. 5.1. Discovery of B c
- Page 72 and 73:
Chapter 5In order to investigate th
- Page 74 and 75:
Chapter 5Centric breakage and fusio
- Page 76 and 77:
Chapter 5It has not, however, been
- Page 78 and 79:
Chapter 6The results presented in t
- Page 80 and 81:
Chapter 6model for molecular cytoge
- Page 82 and 83:
Chapter 6Fig. 6.2. The meiosis proc
- Page 84 and 85:
Chapter 6over events during FDR mei
- Page 86 and 87:
Chapter 6been detected with GISH an
- Page 88 and 89:
Chapter 6Another feature caused by
- Page 91 and 92:
ReferencesAbe, H.A., Nakano, M.N.,
- Page 93 and 94:
ReferencesChen, Q., and Armstrong,
- Page 95 and 96:
ReferencesHartlerode, A.J., and Scu
- Page 97 and 98:
ReferencesLarson, S.R., Kishii, M.,
- Page 99 and 100:
ReferencesMcClintock, B. 1931. Cyto
- Page 101 and 102:
ReferencesRai, R., Zheng, H., He, H
- Page 103 and 104:
ReferencesStewart, R.N. 1947. The m
- Page 105:
ReferencesZhang, L., Pickering, R.,
- Page 108 and 109:
Summarychromosome rearrangements. T
- Page 111 and 112:
SamenvattingLelie (Lilium) is in de
- Page 113 and 114:
Samenvattingaantal 35 met daarnaast
- Page 115 and 116:
摘 要百 合 系 百 合 科 百
- Page 117 and 118:
Acknowledgements淡 看 世 事 去
- Page 119:
Curriculum VitaeSonglin Xie was bor
- Page 123:
Education Statement of the Graduate