ReferencesDubcovsky, J., Luo, M., and Dvorak, J. 1995. Differentiation between homoeologous<strong>chromosome</strong>s 1A <strong>of</strong> wheat and 1Am <strong>of</strong> Triticum monococcum and its recognition by thewheat Ph1 locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci 92(14): 6645-6649.Farré, A., Lacasa Benito, I., Cistué, L., De Jong, J.H., Romagosa, I., and Jansen, J. 2010.L<strong>in</strong>kage map construction <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g a reciprocal translocation. Theor Appl Genet: 1-9.Feldman, M., Liu, B., Segal, G., Abbo, S., Levy, A.A., and Vega, J.M. 1997. Rapidelim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> low-copy DNA sequences <strong>in</strong> polyploid wheat: a possible mechanism fordifferentiation <strong>of</strong> homoeologous <strong>chromosome</strong>s. Genetics 147(3): 1381-1387.F<strong>in</strong>negan, E.J. 2002. Epialleles--a source <strong>of</strong> random variation <strong>in</strong> times <strong>of</strong> stress. Curr Op<strong>in</strong>Plant Biol 5(2): 101-106.Flavell, R., and Rimpau, J. 1975. Ribosomal RNA genes and supernumerary B-<strong>chromosome</strong>s<strong>of</strong> rye. Heredity 35: 127-131.Fogwill, M. 1957. Differences <strong>in</strong> cross<strong>in</strong>g-over and <strong>chromosome</strong> size <strong>in</strong> the sex cells <strong>of</strong><strong>Lilium</strong> and Fritillaria. Chromosoma 9(1): 493-504.Friebe, B. 1989. Nucleolar activity <strong>of</strong> B-<strong>chromosome</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Allium cernuum (Alliaceae). PlantSyst Evol 163(1): 87-92.Friebe, B., Jiang, J., and Gill, B. 1995. Detection <strong>of</strong> 5S rDNA and other repeated DNA onsupernumerary B <strong>chromosome</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Triticum species (Poaceae). Plant Syst Evol 196(3):131-139.Friebe, B., Jiang, J., Raupp, W., McIntosh, R., and Gill, B. 1996. Characterization <strong>of</strong> wheatalientranslocations conferr<strong>in</strong>g resistance to diseases and pests: current status. Euphytica91(1): 59-87.Gaeta, R.T., and Pires, C.J. 2010. Homoeologous recomb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> allopolyploids: thepolyploid ratchet. New Phytol 186(1): 18-28.Gaeta, R.T., Pires, J.C., Iniguez-Luy, F., Leon, E., and Osborn, T.C. 2007. Genomic changes<strong>in</strong> resynthesized Brassica napus and their effect on gene expression and phenotype. PlantCell 19(11): 3403-3417.Gale, M.D., and Devos, K.M. 1998. Comparative genetics <strong>in</strong> the grasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci95(5): 1971-1974.Gerlach, W., and Bedbrook, J. 1979. Clon<strong>in</strong>g and characterization <strong>of</strong> ribosomal RNA genesfrom wheat and barley. Nucleic Acids Res 7(7): 1869-1885.Gisselsson, D. 2008. Classification <strong>of</strong> <strong>chromosome</strong> segregation errors <strong>in</strong> cancer. Chromosoma117(6): 511-519.Gop<strong>in</strong>athan, M., and Babu, C. 1986. Meiotic studies <strong>of</strong> the F1 hybrid between rice bean(Vigna umbellata) and its wild relative V. m<strong>in</strong>ima. Genetica 71(2): 115-117.Gorbunova, V., and Levy, A.A. 1999. How plants make ends meet: DNA double-strand breakrepair. Trends Plant Sci 4(7): 263-269.Haga, T. 1953. Meiosis <strong>in</strong> Paris II. Spontaneous breakage and fusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>chromosome</strong>s.Cytologia 18(1): 50-66.88
ReferencesHartlerode, A.J., and Scully, R. 2009. Mechanisms <strong>of</strong> double-strand break repair <strong>in</strong> somaticmammalian cells. Biochem J 423(2): 157-168.Heneen, W.K. 1963. Meiosis <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrid Elymus farctus × E. repens. Hereditas49(1‐2): 107-118.Heslop-Harrison, J. 2000. Comparative genome organization <strong>in</strong> plants: from sequence andmarkers to chromat<strong>in</strong> and <strong>chromosome</strong>s. Plant Cell 12(5): 617-636.Houck, M., Kumamoto, A., Cabrera, R., and Benirschke, K. 2000. Chromosomalrearrangements <strong>in</strong> a Somali wild ass pedigree, Equus africanus somaliensis (Perissodactyla,Equidae). Cytogenet Genome Res 80(1-4): 117-122.Ijdo, J., Wells, R., Bald<strong>in</strong>i, A., and Reeders, S. 1991. Improved telomere detection us<strong>in</strong>g atelomere repeat probe (TTAGGG)n generated by PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 19(17): 4780.Jellen, E.N., Gill, B.S., and Cox, T.S. 1994. Genomic <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization differentiatesbetween A/D-and C-genome chromat<strong>in</strong> and detects <strong>in</strong>tergenomic translocations <strong>in</strong>polyploid oat species (genus Avena). Genome 37(4): 613-618.Jenk<strong>in</strong>s, G., and Scanlon, M.J. 1987. Chromosome pair<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a Lolium temulentum x Loliumperenne diploid hybrid with a low chiasma frequency. Theor Appl Genet 73(4): 516-522.Ji, Y., and Chetelat, R. 2003. Homoeologous pair<strong>in</strong>g and recomb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> Solanumlycopersicoides monosomic addition and substitution l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> tomato. Theor Appl Genet106(6): 979-989.Jones, G., and Brumpton, R. 1971. Sister and non-sister chromatid U-type exchange <strong>in</strong> ryemeiosis. Chromosoma 33(2): 115-128.Jones, G.H. 1969. Further correlations between chiasmata and U-type exchanges <strong>in</strong> ryemeiosis. Chromosoma 26(1): 105-118.Jones, N., and Houben, A. 2003. B <strong>chromosome</strong>s <strong>in</strong> plants: escapees from the A <strong>chromosome</strong>genome? Trends Plant Sci 8(9): 417-423.Jones, R.N. 1995. B <strong>chromosome</strong>s <strong>in</strong> plants. New Phytol 131(4): 411-434.Jones, R.N., González-Sánchez, M., González-García, M., Vega, J., and Puertas, M. 2008a.Chromosomes with a life <strong>of</strong> their own. Cytogenet Genome Res 120(3-4): 265-280.Jones, R.N., and Rees, H. 1982. B <strong>chromosome</strong>s. Academic Press.Jones, R.N., Viegas, W., and Houben, A. 2008b. A century <strong>of</strong> B <strong>chromosome</strong>s <strong>in</strong> plants: Sowhat? Ann Bot 101(6): 767-775.Kamiri, M., Stift, M., Srairi, I., Costant<strong>in</strong>o, G., Moussadik, A., Hmyene, A., Bakry, F.,Ollitrault, P., and Froelicher, Y. 2011. Evidence for non-disomic <strong>in</strong>heritance <strong>in</strong> a Citrus<strong>in</strong>terspecific tetraploid somatic hybrid between C. reticulata and C. limon us<strong>in</strong>g SSRmarkers and <strong>cytogenetic</strong> <strong>analysis</strong>. Plant Cell Rep 30(8): 1415-1425. doi:10.1007/s00299-011-1050-x.Kamphuis, L.G., Williams, A.H., D'Souza, N.K., Pfaff, T., Ellwood, S.R., Groves, E.J., S<strong>in</strong>gh,K.B., Oliver, R.P., and Lichtenzveig, J. 2007. The Medicago truncatula referenceaccession A17 has an aberrant chromosomal configuration. New Phytol 174(2): 299-303.89
- Page 3 and 4:
A molecular cytogenetic analysis of
- Page 5:
Table of ContentsChapter 1General I
- Page 8 and 9:
Chapter 1LilyLilies belong to genus
- Page 10 and 11:
Chapter 1counterparts (Finnegan 200
- Page 12 and 13:
Chapter 1renewed interest in detect
- Page 14 and 15:
Chapter 1recombination, mechanisms
- Page 16 and 17:
Chapter 1is only an equational segr
- Page 18 and 19:
Chapter 1quite divergent with vario
- Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 2An assessment of chromosom
- Page 23 and 24:
Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 25 and 26:
Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 27 and 28:
Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 29 and 30:
Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 31 and 32:
Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 33 and 34:
Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 35 and 36:
Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 3Elucidation of intergenomi
- Page 39 and 40:
Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 41 and 42:
Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 43 and 44: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 45 and 46: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 47 and 48: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 49: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 52 and 53: Chapter 4AbstractMeiotic abnormalit
- Page 54 and 55: Chapter 4There are some criteria to
- Page 56 and 57: Chapter 4FISH experiments were perf
- Page 58 and 59: Chapter 4was apparently shorter, wi
- Page 60 and 61: Chapter 4bridges is explained as U-
- Page 62 and 63: Chapter 4of the sexual polyploidize
- Page 64 and 65: Chapter 4fragment have the same len
- Page 66 and 67: Chapter 5AbstractSupernumerary (B)
- Page 68 and 69: Chapter 5their origin, the structur
- Page 70 and 71: Chapter 5Fig. 5.1. Discovery of B c
- Page 72 and 73: Chapter 5In order to investigate th
- Page 74 and 75: Chapter 5Centric breakage and fusio
- Page 76 and 77: Chapter 5It has not, however, been
- Page 78 and 79: Chapter 6The results presented in t
- Page 80 and 81: Chapter 6model for molecular cytoge
- Page 82 and 83: Chapter 6Fig. 6.2. The meiosis proc
- Page 84 and 85: Chapter 6over events during FDR mei
- Page 86 and 87: Chapter 6been detected with GISH an
- Page 88 and 89: Chapter 6Another feature caused by
- Page 91 and 92: ReferencesAbe, H.A., Nakano, M.N.,
- Page 93: ReferencesChen, Q., and Armstrong,
- Page 97 and 98: ReferencesLarson, S.R., Kishii, M.,
- Page 99 and 100: ReferencesMcClintock, B. 1931. Cyto
- Page 101 and 102: ReferencesRai, R., Zheng, H., He, H
- Page 103 and 104: ReferencesStewart, R.N. 1947. The m
- Page 105: ReferencesZhang, L., Pickering, R.,
- Page 108 and 109: Summarychromosome rearrangements. T
- Page 111 and 112: SamenvattingLelie (Lilium) is in de
- Page 113 and 114: Samenvattingaantal 35 met daarnaast
- Page 115 and 116: 摘 要百 合 系 百 合 科 百
- Page 117 and 118: Acknowledgements淡 看 世 事 去
- Page 119: Curriculum VitaeSonglin Xie was bor
- Page 123: Education Statement of the Graduate