Chapter 4<strong>of</strong> the sexual polyploidized progenies can be aneuploids. That is why a few aneuploids werefound with one or two <strong>chromosome</strong>s miss<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> backcross progenies <strong>of</strong> lily after sexualpolyploidization (Khan 2009; Khan et al. 2009a; Zhou 2007). However, anaphase bridg<strong>in</strong>g isnot the only factor that contributes to aneuploids, at metaphase I dur<strong>in</strong>g meiosis, numericalunivalent were also present <strong>in</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the pollen mother cells (chapter 3), the randommovements <strong>of</strong> these univalents <strong>in</strong> the first meiotic division can also lead to the production <strong>of</strong>aneuploids (Zhou 2007). In conclusion, meiosis with anaphase bridges mostly producedunviable gametes due to <strong>chromosome</strong> number or structure variation.Fig. 4.2. Illustration <strong>of</strong> the production <strong>of</strong> <strong>chromosome</strong> bridgesanaphase I stage dur<strong>in</strong>g meiosis <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terspecific lily hybridswith different configurations at56
U-type exchanges <strong>in</strong> <strong>Lilium</strong> hybridsChromatid breakage is probably a genetic response to genomic shock caused by<strong>in</strong>terspecific hybridization <strong>in</strong> lily. Like radiation, <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybridization can cause meiotic<strong>in</strong>stability, which is common <strong>in</strong> many species hybrids. Our results showed that univalents,multivalents, non-homologous bivalents, bridges as well as r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>chromosome</strong>s were presentdur<strong>in</strong>g meiosis <strong>of</strong> these lily hybrids. Similarly, univalent, cha<strong>in</strong> and r<strong>in</strong>g multivalents andanaphase bridges were found <strong>in</strong> the pollen mother cells <strong>of</strong> a F1 hybrid between Vignaumbellate and V. m<strong>in</strong>ima (Gop<strong>in</strong>athan and Babu 1986). Non-homologous <strong>chromosome</strong>pair<strong>in</strong>g has also been found <strong>in</strong> the hybrids <strong>of</strong> Lolium temulentum × L. perenne. In the hybrids<strong>of</strong> Helianthus annuus × H. tuberosus, genomic alterations were revealed to be the response togenomic shock follow<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>terspecific cross (Natali et al. 1998). These meioticabnormalities all <strong>in</strong>volved chromatid breakage. S<strong>in</strong>ce normal meiosis can be found <strong>in</strong> both <strong>of</strong>the parents <strong>of</strong> the hybrids, the meiotic irregularity is probably due to <strong>in</strong>terspecifichybridization. Indeed, dur<strong>in</strong>g allopolyploid formation, <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybridization, rather thanpolyploidization, is likely the reason <strong>of</strong> extensive genetic and epigenetic changes (Wang et al.2006). Furthermore, if <strong>chromosome</strong> breakage occurs at the centromere position, fusion <strong>of</strong> twobroken chromatids from one <strong>chromosome</strong> arm will probably lead to the production <strong>of</strong>iso<strong>chromosome</strong>s (see chapter 5), which has been also presumed as a mechanism lead<strong>in</strong>g to B<strong>chromosome</strong>s.We propose that U-type exchanges <strong>in</strong> lily hybrids are DSBs and the repair mediated byNHEJ. It has been revealed that crossovers are <strong>in</strong>deed DSBs followed by the repair by HR(Keeney 2001; Puchta 2005; Szostak et al. 1983). In mitotic cells, DSB repair with the sisterchromatid appears to be preferred, whereas <strong>in</strong>terhomolog recomb<strong>in</strong>ation is favoured dur<strong>in</strong>gmeiosis (Pradillo and Santos 2011). Sequence repeats comprise a large fraction <strong>of</strong> lily genomeand, although they can be quite divergent from each other, their enormous number anddispersal throughout the genome also makes them potential repair templates. Increase <strong>of</strong> HRmediated events—such as unequal sister-chromatid exchange and ectopic HR between nonallelicrepeated DNA fragments can result <strong>in</strong> chromosomal rearrangements (Aguilera andGómez-González 2008). As a result, altered karyotypes <strong>in</strong> yeast have been expla<strong>in</strong>ed as due toDSBs repaired either by reciprocal unequal sister chromatid recomb<strong>in</strong>ation or ectopicrecomb<strong>in</strong>ation between non-homologous <strong>chromosome</strong> (Loidl and Nairz 1997). However, suchexplanation doesn’t fit the current results for two reasons. Firstly, none <strong>of</strong> reciprocal unequalrecomb<strong>in</strong>ation and ectopic recomb<strong>in</strong>ation can produce bridges and fragments like what hasbeen found <strong>in</strong> lily (Fig. 4.1). Like <strong>in</strong> yeast, two mechanisms normally lead to variation <strong>of</strong><strong>chromosome</strong> size. Even there was an <strong>in</strong>version, the chance that two fluorescence <strong>of</strong> the57
- Page 3 and 4:
A molecular cytogenetic analysis of
- Page 5:
Table of ContentsChapter 1General I
- Page 8 and 9:
Chapter 1LilyLilies belong to genus
- Page 10 and 11:
Chapter 1counterparts (Finnegan 200
- Page 12 and 13: Chapter 1renewed interest in detect
- Page 14 and 15: Chapter 1recombination, mechanisms
- Page 16 and 17: Chapter 1is only an equational segr
- Page 18 and 19: Chapter 1quite divergent with vario
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter 2An assessment of chromosom
- Page 23 and 24: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 25 and 26: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 27 and 28: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 29 and 30: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 31 and 32: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 33 and 34: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 35 and 36: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 3Elucidation of intergenomi
- Page 39 and 40: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 41 and 42: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 43 and 44: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 45 and 46: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 47 and 48: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 49: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 52 and 53: Chapter 4AbstractMeiotic abnormalit
- Page 54 and 55: Chapter 4There are some criteria to
- Page 56 and 57: Chapter 4FISH experiments were perf
- Page 58 and 59: Chapter 4was apparently shorter, wi
- Page 60 and 61: Chapter 4bridges is explained as U-
- Page 64 and 65: Chapter 4fragment have the same len
- Page 66 and 67: Chapter 5AbstractSupernumerary (B)
- Page 68 and 69: Chapter 5their origin, the structur
- Page 70 and 71: Chapter 5Fig. 5.1. Discovery of B c
- Page 72 and 73: Chapter 5In order to investigate th
- Page 74 and 75: Chapter 5Centric breakage and fusio
- Page 76 and 77: Chapter 5It has not, however, been
- Page 78 and 79: Chapter 6The results presented in t
- Page 80 and 81: Chapter 6model for molecular cytoge
- Page 82 and 83: Chapter 6Fig. 6.2. The meiosis proc
- Page 84 and 85: Chapter 6over events during FDR mei
- Page 86 and 87: Chapter 6been detected with GISH an
- Page 88 and 89: Chapter 6Another feature caused by
- Page 91 and 92: ReferencesAbe, H.A., Nakano, M.N.,
- Page 93 and 94: ReferencesChen, Q., and Armstrong,
- Page 95 and 96: ReferencesHartlerode, A.J., and Scu
- Page 97 and 98: ReferencesLarson, S.R., Kishii, M.,
- Page 99 and 100: ReferencesMcClintock, B. 1931. Cyto
- Page 101 and 102: ReferencesRai, R., Zheng, H., He, H
- Page 103 and 104: ReferencesStewart, R.N. 1947. The m
- Page 105: ReferencesZhang, L., Pickering, R.,
- Page 108 and 109: Summarychromosome rearrangements. T
- Page 111 and 112: SamenvattingLelie (Lilium) is in de
- Page 113 and 114:
Samenvattingaantal 35 met daarnaast
- Page 115 and 116:
摘 要百 合 系 百 合 科 百
- Page 117 and 118:
Acknowledgements淡 看 世 事 去
- Page 119:
Curriculum VitaeSonglin Xie was bor
- Page 123:
Education Statement of the Graduate