13.07.2015 Views

A molecular cytogenetic analysis of chromosome behavior in Lilium ...

A molecular cytogenetic analysis of chromosome behavior in Lilium ...

A molecular cytogenetic analysis of chromosome behavior in Lilium ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4FISH experiments were performed us<strong>in</strong>g two different probes, 1) clone pTa71 which conta<strong>in</strong>sthe EcoRI fragment <strong>of</strong> 45S ribosomal DNA from wheat (9kb) (Gerlach and Bedbrook 1979);2) a probe <strong>of</strong> telomere repeat sequence generated by PCR accord<strong>in</strong>g to Cox et al. (1993) withm<strong>in</strong>or modifications. In brief, two oligomer primers 1fw (5’-TTTAGGG-3’) 5 and 1rev (5’-CCCTAAA-3’) 5 were synthetized by Isogen Life Science, the Netherlands. PCR reactionswere set-up <strong>in</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> template DNA. Each 100 µL PCR reaction comprised <strong>of</strong> 10 µL<strong>of</strong> 10 × Taq buffer (Promega), 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , 2 units <strong>of</strong> Taq polymerase (Promega), 2.5 mMdNTPs and 10 pmol <strong>of</strong> each primer 1fw and 1rev. Temperature cycl<strong>in</strong>g was performedaccord<strong>in</strong>g to Ijdo et al. (1991) with a f<strong>in</strong>al extension step <strong>of</strong> 10 m<strong>in</strong> at 72°C. Probes <strong>of</strong>different genomic DNA were labelled with either digoxigen<strong>in</strong>-11-dUTP or biot<strong>in</strong>-16-dUTP bynick translation accord<strong>in</strong>g to the manufacturer’s <strong>in</strong>struction (Roche Diannostics GmbH,Mannheim, Germany).In situ hybridizationThe procedure <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong> situ hybridization was carried out accord<strong>in</strong>g to Khan et al. (2009a) andXie et al. (2010) with m<strong>in</strong>or modification. For GISH, the hybridization mixture conta<strong>in</strong>ed50% formamide, 10% dextransulphate, 2 × sal<strong>in</strong>e sodium citrate (SSC), 0.25% sodiumdodecyl sulphate (SDS), 1.0-1.5 ng/μL for the probe and 25-50 ng/μL block DNA. While forFISH, the hybridization mixture conta<strong>in</strong>ed 50% formamide, 10% dextransulphate, 2 × sal<strong>in</strong>esodium citrate (SSC), 0.25% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), 2.0-2.5 ng/μL for the probe and50-100 ng/μL block DNA. The mixture was <strong>in</strong>cubated at 73°C for 10 m<strong>in</strong>utes and ice cooledfor 10 m<strong>in</strong>utes, then 60μl hybridization mixture was added on each slide. After denaturationfor 5 m<strong>in</strong>utes at 80°C , slides were left <strong>in</strong> a pre-warmed box for overnight hybridization at37°C. After hybridization, the slides were washed <strong>in</strong> 2 × SSC for 15 m<strong>in</strong>utes then str<strong>in</strong>gencywash<strong>in</strong>g was followed with 0.1 × SSC at 42°C for 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes. The probe labelled withdigoxigen<strong>in</strong>-11-dUTP was detected with the anti-digoxigen<strong>in</strong> detection system and probelabelled with biot<strong>in</strong>-16-dUTP was detected by cy3-streptavid<strong>in</strong> system. Then the slides werecountersta<strong>in</strong>ed with DAPI and mounted with Vectashield. At last, photographs were takenwith a Canon digital camera attached to a Zeiss Axiophot epifluorescence microscopy.50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!