Chapter 6Fig. 6.2. The meiosis process <strong>of</strong> <strong>chromosome</strong>s with a reciprocal translocation and their relevance to genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g. Gametes from adjacent segregation <strong>of</strong> aquadrivalent from a reciprocal translocation are generally unviable, while gametes from alternate segregation are balanced and viable if crossovers happened<strong>in</strong> the translocated <strong>chromosome</strong> segments, as well as the other <strong>chromosome</strong> arms. Any s<strong>in</strong>gle crossover between non-sister chromatids <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terstitial areawill lead to the production <strong>of</strong> duplication-deficiency gametes. Note: “+” stands for gametes that are viable, “-” stands for gametes that are unviable.76
General DiscussionTwo translocated <strong>chromosome</strong>s usually form ‘pseudol<strong>in</strong>kage’ (Albrecht and Chetelat 2009;Farré et al. 2010; Kamphuis et al. 2007). Meanwhile, s<strong>in</strong>ce normal and translocated segmentslead to reduced crossover <strong>in</strong>terference, distance between markers on normal and translocated<strong>chromosome</strong> fragments will be wrongly estimated, marker order is ambiguous along themerged l<strong>in</strong>kage groups and higher str<strong>in</strong>gencies (<strong>in</strong>crease the LODs) do not result <strong>in</strong> a division<strong>in</strong>to two balanced <strong>chromosome</strong>s (Albrecht and Chetelat 2009). Third, the existence <strong>of</strong>duplication leads to erroneous location <strong>of</strong> markers <strong>in</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>kage group associated with the<strong>chromosome</strong> with duplication (Fig. 6.1). Furthermore, <strong>chromosome</strong>s with two or more types<strong>of</strong> structure variation make the genetic maps even more complicated. In conclusion,<strong>chromosome</strong> rearrangements not only cause reduced fertility, but also lead to errors whenestimat<strong>in</strong>g genetic distances between markers.Sexual polyploidization and its significance <strong>in</strong> polyploidy mapp<strong>in</strong>gWhen <strong>in</strong>terspecific crosses are made between distantly related species, the result<strong>in</strong>g hybridsare generally sterile. This hybrid sterility is expla<strong>in</strong>ed to be due to the failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>chromosome</strong>association and the forthcom<strong>in</strong>g error-disjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g meiosis because <strong>of</strong> the parentaldivergence (Asano 1982). However, there is still a wide genetic variation, with some<strong>in</strong>dividuals possess<strong>in</strong>g a low fertility. These outstand<strong>in</strong>g genotypes normally produceunreduced (2n) gametes, as well as fewer n gametes (Ramanna and Jacobsen 2003). Theprocess <strong>of</strong> restor<strong>in</strong>g fertility through unreduced gametes is termed as sexual (meiotic)polyploidization, as a comparison with asexual (mitotic) polyploidization. The production <strong>of</strong>unreduced gametes has been reported <strong>in</strong> many <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids, such as <strong>Lilium</strong> (Van Tuylet al. 1989), Alstroemeria (Kamstra et al. 1999), Allium (Khrustaleva and Kik 1998) andothers. One <strong>of</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> advantages <strong>of</strong> sexual polyploidization, compared with its counterpart,is the occurrence <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tergenomic recomb<strong>in</strong>ation dur<strong>in</strong>g the production <strong>of</strong> unreduced gametes,which will lead to segregation and diversity <strong>in</strong> the next generation (Ramanna and Jacobsen2003). The segregation <strong>in</strong> the result<strong>in</strong>g population provides a possibility for genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g.When detect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tergenomic alteration <strong>in</strong> sexual polyploidized allopolyploids, <strong>molecular</strong><strong>cytogenetic</strong> techniques (GISH and FISH) are more powerful compared with <strong>molecular</strong>markers. The detect<strong>in</strong>g efficiency <strong>of</strong> the two methods with respect to unreduced (2n) gametesis compared <strong>in</strong> Fig. 6.3. GISH can simultaneously detect <strong>in</strong>tergenomic recomb<strong>in</strong>ation,characterize the cross<strong>in</strong>g over events and trace the orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> non-sister chromatid exchangeswhen comb<strong>in</strong>ed with meiosis observation. However, <strong>molecular</strong> markers with multi-locus<strong>analysis</strong> <strong>in</strong> cross<strong>in</strong>g progenies cannot detect reciprocal cross<strong>in</strong>g over, and quantification <strong>of</strong>allele number by the <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> bands is not always accurate (Gaeta and Pires 2010; Nicolaset al. 2007). For example, <strong>in</strong> four types <strong>of</strong> segregated products between homoeologous<strong>chromosome</strong>s with a s<strong>in</strong>gle or two strand double crossover dur<strong>in</strong>g FDR meiosis (Fig. 6.3),GISH can detect all the <strong>in</strong>tergenomic recomb<strong>in</strong>ations, whereas <strong>molecular</strong> markers can onlydetect two types <strong>of</strong> them. In the recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>chromosome</strong>s derived from different cross<strong>in</strong>g77
- Page 3 and 4:
A molecular cytogenetic analysis of
- Page 5:
Table of ContentsChapter 1General I
- Page 8 and 9:
Chapter 1LilyLilies belong to genus
- Page 10 and 11:
Chapter 1counterparts (Finnegan 200
- Page 12 and 13:
Chapter 1renewed interest in detect
- Page 14 and 15:
Chapter 1recombination, mechanisms
- Page 16 and 17:
Chapter 1is only an equational segr
- Page 18 and 19:
Chapter 1quite divergent with vario
- Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 2An assessment of chromosom
- Page 23 and 24:
Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 25 and 26:
Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 27 and 28:
Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 29 and 30:
Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 31 and 32: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 33 and 34: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 35 and 36: Chromosome rearrangements in Lilium
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 3Elucidation of intergenomi
- Page 39 and 40: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 41 and 42: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 43 and 44: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 45 and 46: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 47 and 48: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 49: Intergenomic recombination and chro
- Page 52 and 53: Chapter 4AbstractMeiotic abnormalit
- Page 54 and 55: Chapter 4There are some criteria to
- Page 56 and 57: Chapter 4FISH experiments were perf
- Page 58 and 59: Chapter 4was apparently shorter, wi
- Page 60 and 61: Chapter 4bridges is explained as U-
- Page 62 and 63: Chapter 4of the sexual polyploidize
- Page 64 and 65: Chapter 4fragment have the same len
- Page 66 and 67: Chapter 5AbstractSupernumerary (B)
- Page 68 and 69: Chapter 5their origin, the structur
- Page 70 and 71: Chapter 5Fig. 5.1. Discovery of B c
- Page 72 and 73: Chapter 5In order to investigate th
- Page 74 and 75: Chapter 5Centric breakage and fusio
- Page 76 and 77: Chapter 5It has not, however, been
- Page 78 and 79: Chapter 6The results presented in t
- Page 80 and 81: Chapter 6model for molecular cytoge
- Page 84 and 85: Chapter 6over events during FDR mei
- Page 86 and 87: Chapter 6been detected with GISH an
- Page 88 and 89: Chapter 6Another feature caused by
- Page 91 and 92: ReferencesAbe, H.A., Nakano, M.N.,
- Page 93 and 94: ReferencesChen, Q., and Armstrong,
- Page 95 and 96: ReferencesHartlerode, A.J., and Scu
- Page 97 and 98: ReferencesLarson, S.R., Kishii, M.,
- Page 99 and 100: ReferencesMcClintock, B. 1931. Cyto
- Page 101 and 102: ReferencesRai, R., Zheng, H., He, H
- Page 103 and 104: ReferencesStewart, R.N. 1947. The m
- Page 105: ReferencesZhang, L., Pickering, R.,
- Page 108 and 109: Summarychromosome rearrangements. T
- Page 111 and 112: SamenvattingLelie (Lilium) is in de
- Page 113 and 114: Samenvattingaantal 35 met daarnaast
- Page 115 and 116: 摘 要百 合 系 百 合 科 百
- Page 117 and 118: Acknowledgements淡 看 世 事 去
- Page 119: Curriculum VitaeSonglin Xie was bor
- Page 123: Education Statement of the Graduate