13.07.2015 Views

A molecular cytogenetic analysis of chromosome behavior in Lilium ...

A molecular cytogenetic analysis of chromosome behavior in Lilium ...

A molecular cytogenetic analysis of chromosome behavior in Lilium ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 6The results presented <strong>in</strong> this thesis ma<strong>in</strong>ly focus on the <strong>analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>chromosome</strong> behaviour <strong>in</strong>lily hybrids, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terspecific F1 hybrids as well as backcross progenies, us<strong>in</strong>g<strong>molecular</strong> <strong>cytogenetic</strong> techniques. It has been found that 1) there were no <strong>chromosome</strong>rearrangements <strong>in</strong> neopolyploids <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lilium</strong> hybrids (Chapter 2); 2) the <strong>in</strong>tergenomicrecomb<strong>in</strong>ation, which has been found <strong>in</strong> sexual polyploidized backcross progenies, orig<strong>in</strong>atedfrom chiasmata formation and cross<strong>in</strong>g over dur<strong>in</strong>g meiosis (Chapter 2 and 3); 3) meioticabnormalities, such as non-homologous <strong>chromosome</strong> pair<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> multivalents and(few) bivalents, were due to the existence <strong>of</strong> a reciprocal translocation <strong>in</strong> the paternal parent‘Connecticut K<strong>in</strong>g’; 4) <strong>chromosome</strong> breakage and anaphase bridg<strong>in</strong>g were found to be thecause <strong>of</strong> <strong>chromosome</strong> structure variation (Chapter 4); 4) iso<strong>chromosome</strong>s were produced dueto the irregularity <strong>of</strong> meiosis <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids <strong>of</strong> lily (Chapter 5). Such results donot only contribute to fundamental research <strong>in</strong> allopolyploid evolution and speciation, but canalso benefit plant breed<strong>in</strong>g by solv<strong>in</strong>g problems <strong>in</strong> genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g. In this Chapter, sometopics namely:1) Interspecific hybrids <strong>of</strong> lily: a model for <strong>molecular</strong> <strong>cytogenetic</strong> research2) Chromosome rearrangements and its relevance to genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>g3) Sexual polyploidization and its significance <strong>in</strong> polyploidy mapp<strong>in</strong>g4) Meiotic abnormalities <strong>in</strong> lily <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybrids5) Cross<strong>in</strong>g over and <strong>in</strong>trogression breed<strong>in</strong>g6) Genomic shock, iso<strong>chromosome</strong> formation and B <strong>chromosome</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g sexualpolyploidizationwill be discussed and future perspectives will be presented to draw more attention to thetheoretical and practical aspects <strong>of</strong> homoeologous <strong>chromosome</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction.Interspecific hybrids <strong>of</strong> lily: a model for <strong>molecular</strong> <strong>cytogenetic</strong>researchConventional diploid lily cultivars are be<strong>in</strong>g replaced by recently produced polyploidycultivars. The genus <strong>Lilium</strong> consists <strong>of</strong> about 80 species and has been classified <strong>in</strong>to 7botanical sections (Comber 1949; De Jong 1974). A noticeable feature is that <strong>in</strong>terspecificcrosses with<strong>in</strong> each section are relatively easy and the resultant hybrids are generally fertile,while crosses between species from different sections are difficult because <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong>pre- and post- fertilization barriers (Van Tuyl and Lim 2003). As a result, a number <strong>of</strong> hybridgroups which show dist<strong>in</strong>ct morphological characteristics have been bred throughconventional cross<strong>in</strong>g methods (McRae 1998). However, neopolyploids, derived from<strong>in</strong>terspecific (between sections) hybridization and polyploidization, are play<strong>in</strong>g a prom<strong>in</strong>entrole <strong>in</strong> lily breed<strong>in</strong>g with the aim <strong>of</strong> comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g desirable traits <strong>of</strong> different hybrid groups (VanTuyl and Lim 2003). With the advance <strong>of</strong> technology, barriers <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terspecific hybridization72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!