13.07.2015 Views

A molecular cytogenetic analysis of chromosome behavior in Lilium ...

A molecular cytogenetic analysis of chromosome behavior in Lilium ...

A molecular cytogenetic analysis of chromosome behavior in Lilium ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Small aberrant <strong>chromosome</strong>s and B <strong>chromosome</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>Lilium</strong> hybridsand Appels 1986); 3) a probe <strong>of</strong> telomere repeat sequence generated by PCR accord<strong>in</strong>g to Coxet al. (1993) with m<strong>in</strong>or modifications. In brief, two oligomer primers 1fw (5’-TTTAGGG-3’) 5 and 1rev (5’-CCCTAAA-3’) 5 were synthesized by Isogen Life Science, Netherlands.Concatemers were produced dur<strong>in</strong>g a PCR reaction <strong>in</strong> which the primers also serve astemplate. Each 100 μl reaction comprised 10μl <strong>of</strong> 10×Taq buffer (Promega) 1.5mM MgCl 2 , 2units <strong>of</strong> Taq polymerase (Promega), 2.5mM dNTPs and 10pmol <strong>of</strong> each primer. Temperaturecycl<strong>in</strong>g was performed accord<strong>in</strong>g to Ijdo et al. (1991) with a f<strong>in</strong>al extension step <strong>of</strong> 10 m<strong>in</strong> at72°C.Probes were labelled with either digoxigen<strong>in</strong>-11-dUTP or biot<strong>in</strong>-16-dUTP us<strong>in</strong>g standardnick translation accord<strong>in</strong>g to the manufacturer’s <strong>in</strong>struction (Roche Diagnostics GmbH,Mannheim, Germany).In situ hybridizationGISH was carried out accord<strong>in</strong>g to Barba-Gonzalez et al. (2005b) and Khan et al. (2009a), the40μl hybridization mixture conta<strong>in</strong>ed 50% (v/v) deionized formamide, 10% (w/v) sodiumdextran sulphate, 2×SSC, 0.25% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulphate, 0.6-1.0 ng/μL for each probeand 15-50 ng/μL block DNA. FISH was carried out accord<strong>in</strong>g to Lim et al. (Lim et al. 2001b)with a 40μl hybridization mixture <strong>of</strong> 50% (v/v) deionized formamide, 10% (w/v) sodiumdextran sulphate, 2×SSC, 0.25% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulphate, 2-2.5 ng/μL for each probeand 100-200 ng/μL sheared herr<strong>in</strong>g sperm DNA, the latter was used as block DNA. Thehybridization mixture for GISH or FISH was <strong>in</strong>cubated at 73°C for 10 m<strong>in</strong>utes and ice cooledfor at least 10 m<strong>in</strong>utes, and then was added on each slide, the slides were covered with coverslips and denatured at 80°C for 5 m<strong>in</strong>utes after which slides were transferred to a pre-warmedhybridization chamber for overnight <strong>in</strong>cubation at 37°C. After hybridization, str<strong>in</strong>gencywash<strong>in</strong>g was performed us<strong>in</strong>g 0.1×SSC at 42 °C for 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes. The probes labelled withdigoxigen<strong>in</strong>-11-dUTP or biot<strong>in</strong>-16-dUTP were detected with the anti-digoxigen<strong>in</strong>-FITC orCy3 respectively. After detection the slides were countersta<strong>in</strong>ed with 1 μg/mL 4’,6-diamid<strong>in</strong>o-2-phenyl-<strong>in</strong>dole (DAPI) and mounted with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Inc.,Buil<strong>in</strong>game, USA). Preparations were photographed with a Canon camera attached to a ZeissAxiophot epifluorescence microscopy.Chromosome identification and karyotyp<strong>in</strong>gImages <strong>of</strong> mitotic metaphase <strong>chromosome</strong>s were measured us<strong>in</strong>g the computer programMicroMeasure (Reeves and Tear 2000). In all four genomes (L, A, O, T), the <strong>chromosome</strong>swere put <strong>in</strong>to sequence accord<strong>in</strong>g to decreas<strong>in</strong>g short arm length (Stewart 1947). In order toidentify the <strong>chromosome</strong> <strong>in</strong> each genome, the <strong>chromosome</strong> length, arm ratio, centromere<strong>in</strong>dex (short arm length/ long arm length + short arm length), relative <strong>chromosome</strong> length<strong>in</strong>dex (<strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>chromosome</strong> length/total length <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> <strong>chromosome</strong>s) and 45S rDNAlocus were used as identification tools (Barthes and Ricroch 2001; Lim et al. 2001b).63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!