To download as a PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History
To download as a PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History
To download as a PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
96 so u R c e s o f we a p o n sy s T e m s In n o v a T Io n In T h e depaR TmenT o f defense<br />
Development Command, it did not prompt a m<strong>as</strong>sive reorganization of the inhouse<br />
laboratories and testing facilities previously <strong>as</strong>signed to ARDC. <strong>To</strong> be<br />
sure, the political fallout resulting from the launch of Sputnik in 1957 left its<br />
imprint on the Air Force, primarily through an across-the-board expansion of<br />
R&D programming in space-related fields. The laboratories, however, continued<br />
to provide technical support to industrial contractors through the newly formed<br />
System Command divisions. They also diversified into leading-edge fields<br />
of science and technology relevant to the Air Force’s evolving requirements.<br />
Representative examples to be discussed in this section include the expansion of<br />
testing and evaluation functions at the Arnold Engineering Development <strong>Center</strong><br />
and Edwards Air Force B<strong>as</strong>e, development of conventional armaments at Eglin<br />
Air Force B<strong>as</strong>e, work on artificial intelligence technologies at the Wright Air<br />
Development Division and the Rome Air Development <strong>Center</strong>, and R&D on<br />
high-energy l<strong>as</strong>er and particle-beam weapons at Kirtland Air Force B<strong>as</strong>e.<br />
By the early 1960s, the mission of the Arnold Engineering Development<br />
<strong>Center</strong> had changed to accord with the Air Force’s mandate to support the<br />
Defense Department’s military space program. Consequently, the testing and<br />
evaluation of air-breathing engines, which had dominated the technical activities<br />
at Tullahoma for nearly a decade, faded quickly, surp<strong>as</strong>sed by new programs<br />
to develop rocket motors for missiles and spacecraft. In 1961, for example,<br />
70 percent of the workload at Arnold w<strong>as</strong> committed to the testing of rocket<br />
propulsion systems for the AFSC Ballistic and Space Systems Divisions, the<br />
<strong>Army</strong>, the Navy, NASA, and ARPA. The remaining 30 percent focused on<br />
conventional air-breathing engines for aircraft and other near-surface weapons.<br />
Between 1958, when the first test chambers in the original engine (later renamed<br />
rocket) test facility were modified, and 1960, the number of rocket motor firings<br />
incre<strong>as</strong>ed sharply, from 15 to 761. Meanwhile, the incre<strong>as</strong>ing size and power of<br />
propulsion technologies pushed the operational limits of the testing facilities<br />
even higher. The engine test facility’s original thrust limit of 50,000 pounds had<br />
quadrupled by 1961. New facilities under construction were expected to raise the<br />
ceiling to 500,000 pounds and eventually triple that figure again, to 1.5 million<br />
pounds, by the end of the decade. Among the major weapon systems tested at<br />
Tullahoma during this period w<strong>as</strong> the Air Force’s Minuteman intercontinental<br />
ballistic missile. In addition to test firings of the solid propellant motors at<br />
simulated altitudes, wind tunnel tests were conducted to evaluate the stability<br />
of the entire missile <strong>as</strong>sembly at velocities reaching Mach 8 (eight times the<br />
speed of sound). Aerodynamic studies of the re-entry vehicle were carried out at<br />
subsonic speeds and velocities exceeding Mach 20. Similar tests were completed<br />
for the <strong>Army</strong>’s Redstone and Nike Zeus, NASA’s Mercury and X–15, and the<br />
Navy’s Polaris programs.<br />
Although the testing of rocket motors displaced similar work on air-breathing<br />
engines, the rocket test facility still managed a substantial workload for aircraft<br />
propulsion systems. Representative examples included tests to determine the<br />
combustion efficiency, blowout and re-ignition limits, and component reliability<br />
of the following: the J57 and TF33 jet engines manufactured by the Pratt and<br />
Whitney Division of the United Aircraft Corporation for the Convair F–106