05.12.2012 Views

To download as a PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History

To download as a PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History

To download as a PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ReseaRch a n d developmenT In T h e aIR fo R c e 81<br />

funds for aeronautical R&D, the Navy’s Bureau of Aeronautics. 36 This m<strong>as</strong>sive<br />

technical effort w<strong>as</strong> managed and coordinated through the directorate of<br />

research and development in the Air Materiel Command, located at the newly<br />

named Wright-Patterson Air Force B<strong>as</strong>e in Dayton, Ohio. 37 When the Air<br />

Research and Development Command w<strong>as</strong> established in 1950, however,<br />

AMC’s R&D functions shifted to more narrow pursuits—trouble-shooting<br />

problems and making appropriate modifications to new aircraft, a process AMC<br />

managers called “support engineering.” This type of work had a long history<br />

at AMC—“That is what AMC’s research and development people have been<br />

doing for some time,” Aviation Week observed in 1950. 38 As the new hub of<br />

research and development for the Air Force, ARDC’s institutional growth and<br />

diversification proceeded along two separate but related trajectories. Internal<br />

expansion of the laboratories and testing facilities previously operated by the<br />

Air Materiel Command w<strong>as</strong> matched by a major incre<strong>as</strong>e in R&D outsourcing<br />

to industry and academia. In 1953, for example, nearly 90 percent of ARDC’s<br />

research and development budget w<strong>as</strong> distributed through external contracts<br />

to 1,520 industrial firms and 160 colleges, universities, and other nonprofit<br />

R&D organizations. 39<br />

The Air Materiel Command’s largest in-house R&D facility, comprising<br />

more than a dozen separate laboratories in three divisions (engineering, flight<br />

testing, and all-weather flying), w<strong>as</strong> located at Wright-Patterson Air Force<br />

B<strong>as</strong>e (renamed Wright Air Development <strong>Center</strong> [WADC] after the transfer<br />

of operations to ARDC). The Air Force consolidated electronics research,<br />

36 Leggin, “<strong>Army</strong> Air Forces Research and Development,” 2914. Next in line after the Navy Bureau of<br />

Aeronautics ($75 million) were the following agencies and departments: National Advisory Committee<br />

for Aeronautics ($43.5 million), Navy Bureau of Ordnance ($21.5 million), <strong>Army</strong> Ordnance Department<br />

($11 million), <strong>Of</strong>fice of Naval Research ($5 million), Civil Aeronautics Administration ($1.6 million),<br />

and the Weather Bureau ($630,000). <strong>To</strong>tal federal expenditures for R&D in aeronautics and related fields<br />

that year exceeded $300 million. R. McLarren, “Largest Aero Research Program,” Aviation Week 48 (23<br />

February 1948): 45.<br />

37 The mission requirements of the directorate of research and development were met by the<br />

laboratories and testing facilities managed by the engineering division at Wright-Patterson and the allweather<br />

flying division, located at the Clinton County Air Force B<strong>as</strong>e in Wilmington, Ohio. In addition to<br />

research and development, AMC managed two other directorates: procurement and industrial mobilization<br />

planning; and supply and maintenance. B. W. Chidlaw, “New Weapons for Air Supremacy,” Aero Digest 57<br />

(September 1948): 51.<br />

38 “R&D Command: New AF Group at Dayton Indicates Greater Stress on B<strong>as</strong>ic Research,” Aviation<br />

Week 53 (6 November 1950): 15.<br />

39 T. S. Power, “The Air Research and Development Team,” Aeronautical Engineering Review 14 (April<br />

1955): 40. The annual budget of the <strong>Of</strong>fice of Scientific Research doubled in 1956 to fund expanded<br />

programs in hypersonics, propulsion methods and fuels, high-temperature studies, and solid-state physics.<br />

See R. Hotz, “<strong>US</strong>AF Expands B<strong>as</strong>ic Research Program,” Aviation Week 63 (18 July 1955): 12–13. The<br />

rapid growth of the defense establishment in the 1950s prompted many industrial firms to diversify into<br />

lucrative military markets, w<strong>here</strong><strong>as</strong> others merely expanded the output of in-house production units<br />

originally established during World War II to manufacture weapons and other critical materials for the<br />

armed services. Strategic considerations also played a role in this transformation. Businesses turned to<br />

defense production <strong>as</strong> a hedge against cyclical downturns in civilian markets. “Munitions: A Permanent<br />

U.S. Industry,” Business Week (27 September 1952): 27–28; “The Pentagon’s <strong>To</strong>p Hands,” Business Week<br />

(20 September 1958): 39. See also A. M. Smythe, “The 25 Biggest Defense Suppliers: Part One,” Magazine<br />

of Wall Street 99 (29 September 1956): 12–14, 51–52; and Smythe, “The 25 Biggest Defense Suppliers:<br />

Part Two,” Magazine of Wall Street 99 (13 October 1956): 65–67, 100.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!