To download as a PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History
To download as a PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History
To download as a PDF click here - US Army Center Of Military History
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ReseaRch a n d developmenT In T h e aIR fo R c e 81<br />
funds for aeronautical R&D, the Navy’s Bureau of Aeronautics. 36 This m<strong>as</strong>sive<br />
technical effort w<strong>as</strong> managed and coordinated through the directorate of<br />
research and development in the Air Materiel Command, located at the newly<br />
named Wright-Patterson Air Force B<strong>as</strong>e in Dayton, Ohio. 37 When the Air<br />
Research and Development Command w<strong>as</strong> established in 1950, however,<br />
AMC’s R&D functions shifted to more narrow pursuits—trouble-shooting<br />
problems and making appropriate modifications to new aircraft, a process AMC<br />
managers called “support engineering.” This type of work had a long history<br />
at AMC—“That is what AMC’s research and development people have been<br />
doing for some time,” Aviation Week observed in 1950. 38 As the new hub of<br />
research and development for the Air Force, ARDC’s institutional growth and<br />
diversification proceeded along two separate but related trajectories. Internal<br />
expansion of the laboratories and testing facilities previously operated by the<br />
Air Materiel Command w<strong>as</strong> matched by a major incre<strong>as</strong>e in R&D outsourcing<br />
to industry and academia. In 1953, for example, nearly 90 percent of ARDC’s<br />
research and development budget w<strong>as</strong> distributed through external contracts<br />
to 1,520 industrial firms and 160 colleges, universities, and other nonprofit<br />
R&D organizations. 39<br />
The Air Materiel Command’s largest in-house R&D facility, comprising<br />
more than a dozen separate laboratories in three divisions (engineering, flight<br />
testing, and all-weather flying), w<strong>as</strong> located at Wright-Patterson Air Force<br />
B<strong>as</strong>e (renamed Wright Air Development <strong>Center</strong> [WADC] after the transfer<br />
of operations to ARDC). The Air Force consolidated electronics research,<br />
36 Leggin, “<strong>Army</strong> Air Forces Research and Development,” 2914. Next in line after the Navy Bureau of<br />
Aeronautics ($75 million) were the following agencies and departments: National Advisory Committee<br />
for Aeronautics ($43.5 million), Navy Bureau of Ordnance ($21.5 million), <strong>Army</strong> Ordnance Department<br />
($11 million), <strong>Of</strong>fice of Naval Research ($5 million), Civil Aeronautics Administration ($1.6 million),<br />
and the Weather Bureau ($630,000). <strong>To</strong>tal federal expenditures for R&D in aeronautics and related fields<br />
that year exceeded $300 million. R. McLarren, “Largest Aero Research Program,” Aviation Week 48 (23<br />
February 1948): 45.<br />
37 The mission requirements of the directorate of research and development were met by the<br />
laboratories and testing facilities managed by the engineering division at Wright-Patterson and the allweather<br />
flying division, located at the Clinton County Air Force B<strong>as</strong>e in Wilmington, Ohio. In addition to<br />
research and development, AMC managed two other directorates: procurement and industrial mobilization<br />
planning; and supply and maintenance. B. W. Chidlaw, “New Weapons for Air Supremacy,” Aero Digest 57<br />
(September 1948): 51.<br />
38 “R&D Command: New AF Group at Dayton Indicates Greater Stress on B<strong>as</strong>ic Research,” Aviation<br />
Week 53 (6 November 1950): 15.<br />
39 T. S. Power, “The Air Research and Development Team,” Aeronautical Engineering Review 14 (April<br />
1955): 40. The annual budget of the <strong>Of</strong>fice of Scientific Research doubled in 1956 to fund expanded<br />
programs in hypersonics, propulsion methods and fuels, high-temperature studies, and solid-state physics.<br />
See R. Hotz, “<strong>US</strong>AF Expands B<strong>as</strong>ic Research Program,” Aviation Week 63 (18 July 1955): 12–13. The<br />
rapid growth of the defense establishment in the 1950s prompted many industrial firms to diversify into<br />
lucrative military markets, w<strong>here</strong><strong>as</strong> others merely expanded the output of in-house production units<br />
originally established during World War II to manufacture weapons and other critical materials for the<br />
armed services. Strategic considerations also played a role in this transformation. Businesses turned to<br />
defense production <strong>as</strong> a hedge against cyclical downturns in civilian markets. “Munitions: A Permanent<br />
U.S. Industry,” Business Week (27 September 1952): 27–28; “The Pentagon’s <strong>To</strong>p Hands,” Business Week<br />
(20 September 1958): 39. See also A. M. Smythe, “The 25 Biggest Defense Suppliers: Part One,” Magazine<br />
of Wall Street 99 (29 September 1956): 12–14, 51–52; and Smythe, “The 25 Biggest Defense Suppliers:<br />
Part Two,” Magazine of Wall Street 99 (13 October 1956): 65–67, 100.